search for: publick

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "publick".

Did you mean: public
2012 Aug 09
1
Rgd. publick key authentication failure in Win2003 !!
Hello OpenSSH team, First of all thanks for your OpenSSH tool which helped us a lot in testing our SSH-SFTP client applications. Your tool is developed as per the standards and we suggested the same to our customers also to use with our client applications. Actually now I am facing some problem when I try to connect to OpenSSH server installed in Win2003 using Public key authentication.
2018 Nov 15
2
RHEL 8 Public Beta Released
...I believe is disagree about how CentOS works. I believe CentOS is a binary replica of RedHat Enterprise, and whatever is broken in RedHat Enterprise can only be fixed there. The way you [we] can affect RedHat Enterprise is through their open feedback (not their customer feedback which general publick has no access to), though I have no knowledge is that exists and in what form. But Brilliant people who put together CentOS (thanks a lot, guys!) may chime in to correct me. Valeri > > Broken things in RHEL8 will also be broken in CentOS8, so if we want a > perfect CentOS8 we should...
2018 Nov 15
2
RHEL 8 Public Beta Released
...orks. I believe CentOS is a >> binary replica of RedHat Enterprise, and whatever is broken in RedHat >> Enterprise can only be fixed there. >> >> The way you [we] can affect RedHat Enterprise is through their open >> feedback (not their customer feedback which general publick has no >> access to), though I have no knowledge is that exists and in what form. > > That's exactly why I ask about a mailing list here. Since I was subscribed > to rhelv6-beta in the past I'm wondering if such a list really doesn't > exist anymore these days. Its...
2006 Apr 23
1
[Bug 1185] remote ssh command runs very slow on windows 2003
...G_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: KEX done debug1: userauth-request for user ntregres service ssh-connection method none debug1: attempt 0 failures 0 Failed none for ntregres from 130.35.185.57 port 4902 ssh2 debug1: userauth-request for user ntregres service ssh-connection method publick ey debug1: attempt 1 failures 1 debug1: test whether pkalg/pkblob are acceptable debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 11114/10513 (e=11114/10513) =================HANGS about 10 secs ===================== debug1: trying public key file /home/ntregres/.ssh/authorized_keys debug1: matching key found: file...
2011 Oct 08
3
[PATCH] add log= directive to authorized_hosts
...nstance the line: log="hello world!",no-agent-forwarding,command="/bin/true",no-pty, no-user-rc,no-X11-forwarding,permitopen="127.0.0.1:7" ssh-rsa AAAAB3Nza....xcgaK9xXoU= alex at example.com produces a log line output like Oct 8 11:04:47 test sshd[18469]: Accepted publickey for testuser from 10.11.12.13 port 55580 ssh2 hello world! A more useful use case might be to put the key's comment in the log="" line. This has been tested on 5.3, and compiles on 5.8 and 5.9. The diff is clean against 5.9. I have not provided support for log= being incorporate...
2006 Apr 22
3
[Bug 1184] remote ssh command runs very slow on windows 2003
...G_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: KEX done debug1: userauth-request for user ntregres service ssh-connection method none debug1: attempt 0 failures 0 Failed none for ntregres from 130.35.185.57 port 4902 ssh2 debug1: userauth-request for user ntregres service ssh-connection method publick ey debug1: attempt 1 failures 1 debug1: test whether pkalg/pkblob are acceptable debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 11114/10513 (e=11114/10513) =================HANGS about 10 secs ===================== debug1: trying public key file /home/ntregres/.ssh/authorized_keys debug1: matching key found: file...
2018 Nov 15
0
RHEL 8 Public Beta Released
...ee about how CentOS works. I believe CentOS is a > binary replica of RedHat Enterprise, and whatever is broken in RedHat > Enterprise can only be fixed there. > > The way you [we] can affect RedHat Enterprise is through their open > feedback (not their customer feedback which general publick has no > access to), though I have no knowledge is that exists and in what form. That's exactly why I ask about a mailing list here. Since I was subscribed to rhelv6-beta in the past I'm wondering if such a list really doesn't exist anymore these days. Regards, Simon
2018 Nov 16
0
RHEL 8 Public Beta Released
...tOS is a >>> binary replica of RedHat Enterprise, and whatever is broken in RedHat >>> Enterprise can only be fixed there. >>> >>> The way you [we] can affect RedHat Enterprise is through their open >>> feedback (not their customer feedback which general publick has no >>> access to), though I have no knowledge is that exists and in what form. >> >> That's exactly why I ask about a mailing list here. Since I was >> subscribed >> to rhelv6-beta in the past I'm wondering if such a list really doesn't >> exis...
2018 Nov 12
0
Seen-Flag and Virtual
Hello, We have a very large folder structure (in a public namespace) on our Dovecot server and would now like to create a virtual folder containing all mails of the publick namespace. This worked quite well with dovecot-virtual, but the read status (\seen) is not preserved. i.e. when I read a mail inside the virtual folder, the read status does not affect the original mail. Dovecut was configured with per-user \seen-flag. Is it possible to synchronize the \seen-fla...
2018 Nov 15
2
RHEL 8 Public Beta Released
On 11/15/18 11:50 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta > > Just wondering, is there still something like a mailing list where betas > are discussed? IIRC EL6 beta was the last one I saw but maybe I'm missing > something? That question is pertinent to RedHat
2005 Jan 18
6
I'm gonna kill YUM (mailing list version ;-) )
Hi all. Most of you already know about my problems (well, my computer's problems ;-) ), since we've been discussing on the forum. Hughesjr recommended me to post here, so let's see, I have my faith on you. I have a dedicated server with RH9 that I upgraded to CentOS 3.4 . Everything ok, but after the first yum upgrade and reboot I get this when I try to do a yum update: yum