Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "publick".
Did you mean:
public
2012 Aug 09
1
Rgd. publick key authentication failure in Win2003 !!
Hello OpenSSH team,
First of all thanks for your OpenSSH tool which helped us a lot in testing our SSH-SFTP client applications. Your tool is developed as per the standards and we suggested the same to our customers also to use with our client applications.
Actually now I am facing some problem when I try to connect to OpenSSH server installed in Win2003 using Public key authentication.
2018 Nov 15
2
RHEL 8 Public Beta Released
...I believe is disagree about how CentOS works. I believe CentOS is a
binary replica of RedHat Enterprise, and whatever is broken in RedHat
Enterprise can only be fixed there.
The way you [we] can affect RedHat Enterprise is through their open
feedback (not their customer feedback which general publick has no
access to), though I have no knowledge is that exists and in what form.
But Brilliant people who put together CentOS (thanks a lot, guys!) may
chime in to correct me.
Valeri
>
> Broken things in RHEL8 will also be broken in CentOS8, so if we want a
> perfect CentOS8 we should...
2018 Nov 15
2
RHEL 8 Public Beta Released
...orks. I believe CentOS is a
>> binary replica of RedHat Enterprise, and whatever is broken in RedHat
>> Enterprise can only be fixed there.
>>
>> The way you [we] can affect RedHat Enterprise is through their open
>> feedback (not their customer feedback which general publick has no
>> access to), though I have no knowledge is that exists and in what form.
>
> That's exactly why I ask about a mailing list here. Since I was subscribed
> to rhelv6-beta in the past I'm wondering if such a list really doesn't
> exist anymore these days.
Its...
2006 Apr 23
1
[Bug 1185] remote ssh command runs very slow on windows 2003
...G_NEWKEYS
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
debug1: KEX done
debug1: userauth-request for user ntregres service ssh-connection
method none
debug1: attempt 0 failures 0
Failed none for ntregres from 130.35.185.57 port 4902 ssh2
debug1: userauth-request for user ntregres service ssh-connection
method publick
ey
debug1: attempt 1 failures 1
debug1: test whether pkalg/pkblob are acceptable
debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 11114/10513 (e=11114/10513)
=================HANGS about 10 secs =====================
debug1: trying public key file /home/ntregres/.ssh/authorized_keys
debug1: matching key found: file...
2011 Oct 08
3
[PATCH] add log= directive to authorized_hosts
...nstance the line:
log="hello world!",no-agent-forwarding,command="/bin/true",no-pty,
no-user-rc,no-X11-forwarding,permitopen="127.0.0.1:7"
ssh-rsa AAAAB3Nza....xcgaK9xXoU= alex at example.com
produces a log line output like
Oct 8 11:04:47 test sshd[18469]: Accepted publickey for testuser from
10.11.12.13 port 55580 ssh2 hello world!
A more useful use case might be to put the key's comment in the log=""
line.
This has been tested on 5.3, and compiles on 5.8 and 5.9. The diff
is clean against 5.9.
I have not provided support for log= being incorporate...
2006 Apr 22
3
[Bug 1184] remote ssh command runs very slow on windows 2003
...G_NEWKEYS
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
debug1: KEX done
debug1: userauth-request for user ntregres service ssh-connection
method none
debug1: attempt 0 failures 0
Failed none for ntregres from 130.35.185.57 port 4902 ssh2
debug1: userauth-request for user ntregres service ssh-connection
method publick
ey
debug1: attempt 1 failures 1
debug1: test whether pkalg/pkblob are acceptable
debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 11114/10513 (e=11114/10513)
=================HANGS about 10 secs =====================
debug1: trying public key file /home/ntregres/.ssh/authorized_keys
debug1: matching key found: file...
2018 Nov 15
0
RHEL 8 Public Beta Released
...ee about how CentOS works. I believe CentOS is a
> binary replica of RedHat Enterprise, and whatever is broken in RedHat
> Enterprise can only be fixed there.
>
> The way you [we] can affect RedHat Enterprise is through their open
> feedback (not their customer feedback which general publick has no
> access to), though I have no knowledge is that exists and in what form.
That's exactly why I ask about a mailing list here. Since I was subscribed
to rhelv6-beta in the past I'm wondering if such a list really doesn't
exist anymore these days.
Regards,
Simon
2018 Nov 16
0
RHEL 8 Public Beta Released
...tOS is a
>>> binary replica of RedHat Enterprise, and whatever is broken in RedHat
>>> Enterprise can only be fixed there.
>>>
>>> The way you [we] can affect RedHat Enterprise is through their open
>>> feedback (not their customer feedback which general publick has no
>>> access to), though I have no knowledge is that exists and in what form.
>>
>> That's exactly why I ask about a mailing list here. Since I was
>> subscribed
>> to rhelv6-beta in the past I'm wondering if such a list really doesn't
>> exis...
2018 Nov 12
0
Seen-Flag and Virtual
Hello,
We have a very large folder structure (in a public namespace) on our
Dovecot server and would now like to create a virtual folder
containing all mails of the publick namespace.
This worked quite well with dovecot-virtual, but the read status
(\seen) is not preserved.
i.e. when I read a mail inside the virtual folder, the read status
does not affect the original mail.
Dovecut was configured with per-user \seen-flag.
Is it possible to synchronize the \seen-fla...
2018 Nov 15
2
RHEL 8 Public Beta Released
On 11/15/18 11:50 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
>> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta
>
> Just wondering, is there still something like a mailing list where betas
> are discussed? IIRC EL6 beta was the last one I saw but maybe I'm missing
> something?
That question is pertinent to RedHat
2005 Jan 18
6
I'm gonna kill YUM (mailing list version ;-) )
Hi all.
Most of you already know about my problems (well, my computer's problems ;-)
), since we've been discussing on the forum. Hughesjr recommended me to post
here, so let's see, I have my faith on you.
I have a dedicated server with RH9 that I upgraded to CentOS 3.4 .
Everything ok, but after the first yum upgrade and reboot I get this when I
try to do a yum update:
yum