search for: public_samba_server

On 03/30/2015 09:45 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 18:33 -0400, 02019 wrote: >> I bought and used Using Samba, 2ed, O'Reilly & Associates (Feb. 2003) to >> help me with this 12 years ago, but I think there may be >> interoperability problems between 4.2.0 and 2.2.5 because >> smbclientv4.2.0 -L hostname2.2.5 -N errors out with: > >

On Tuesday 27 January 2015 16:30:18 Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 02:14:20PM +0000, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Still trying to get security = share working, which it appears means I > > need to install Samba 3. As the server is pretty much goverened by this, > > I can > > You don't need Samba3.x, 4.x is no different in

Well, my need is to have access to files on my Ubunutu box from Windows PCs that are connected to different Windows domains. Thank you. Bye Franco

...org/mailman/options/samba > Gary, I think what he is trying to say is that this functionality still exists, but you need to use different samba config options to make it work. Please see the following wiki (which I referenced for you on the samba mailing list). https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Public_Samba_Server If you post your config (you can use XXX as masking if you need to hide parts of it) and explain how it works currently or how you expect it to work, I am sure someone would give you advice on how to get there. As far as I know all the functionality of "security = share" still exists, t...

....samba.org/index.php/Samba_as_a_File_Server> (which seems > like the article that is closest to my needs initially) assume that this > kind of functionality already exists; whereas I don't have (even) that yet. I think this is what you are looking for: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Public_Samba_Server The ArchLinux wiki provide a little more detail in the "Sample Passwordless Configuration" and "Samba Security" sections of this page: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Samba/Tips_and_tricks Dale > >> ... >> As for interoperability between 2.2.5 and 4.2.0 -...

I recently proposed on samba-technical that for Samba 4.0, that we change security=share to have the following semantics: - All connections are made as the guest user - No passwords are required, and no other accounts are available. Naturally, full user-name/password authentication remain available in security=user and above. The rationale is that we need a very simple way to run a 'trust

On Tuesday 27 January 2015 06:43:13 Andrew Bartlett wrote: > You will need to define your 150 users on your server, give them Samba > passwords and give them access to those shares via standard unix groups > and group permissions on the share folders, or (less preferred) the > valid users entry in smb.conf. > > I hope this helps, > > Andrew Bartlett Hi Andrew, That is