Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "ptxsubtarget".
2011 May 06
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH ]Add Subtarget ptx23
...nguage Version 2.3",
+ [FeaturePTX22]>;
+
//===- PTX Shader Model ---------------------------------------------------===//
def FeatureSM10 : SubtargetFeature<"sm10", "PTXShaderModel", "PTX_SM_1_0",
Index: lib/Target/PTX/PTXSubtarget.h
===================================================================
--- lib/Target/PTX/PTXSubtarget.h (revision 130978)
+++ lib/Target/PTX/PTXSubtarget.h (working copy)
@@ -37,7 +37,8 @@
enum PTXVersionEnum {
PTX_VERSION_2_0, /*< PTX Version 2.0 */
PTX_VERSION_2_1, /...
2011 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH ]Add Subtarget ptx23
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote:
> Hi, Justin
>
> Thansk, but I have a little concern though. I saw Chiou mentioned the
> compatibility issue of PTX on the mailing list.
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-March/038654.html
>
> In my PTX.td patch,
>
> def FeaturePTX23 : SubtargetFeature<"ptx23",
2011 May 07
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH ]Add Subtarget ptx23
Hi, Justin
Thansk, but I have a little concern though. I saw Chiou mentioned the
compatibility issue of PTX on the mailing list.
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-March/038654.html
In my PTX.td patch,
def FeaturePTX23 : SubtargetFeature<"ptx23", "PTXVersion", PTX_VERSION_2_3",
"Use PTX Language Version
2011 Mar 10
1
[LLVMdev] [PTX] Should we keep backward-compatibility of PTX?
Hi Justin,
There are some backward incompatible features of PTX; for example,
special registers are redefined as v4i32 (they were v4i16) in PTX 2.0.
And CUDA 4.0 was rolled out last week. I heard that some instructions
are deprecated.
I am not sure how stable (or unstable) PTX specification is. Do you
have a rough assessment of its stability?
If PTX specification is still fast evolving, I would