search for: ptrdist

...utput/hexxagon -5.2% MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/Output/SIBsim4 -4.8% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/Output/cfrac -4.1% MultiSource/Applications/d/Output/make_dparser -4.0% MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/Output/ldecod -3.9% External/Nurbs/Output/nurbs -3.7% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/Output/bc -3.4% MultiSource/Applications/lemon/Output/lemon -3.4% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Output/bigfib -3.4% External/SPEC/CFP2000/183.equake/Output/183.equake -3.2% MultiSource/Applications/hbd/Output/hbd -3.1% MultiSource/Applications/minisat/Output/minisat -3.0% MultiSource/Benchmar...

...MultiSource/Applications/lemon MultiSource/Applications/obsequi MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/voronoi MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame Everything is built off trunk. Has anyone else seen these failures and found a fix? Perhaps I'm missing a dependency? There doesn't appear to be a linux machine on llvm.org/perf to compare with either. paul

Fair enough... The following tests under MultiSource fail: Benchmarks/Olden/power Benchmarks/OptimizerEval Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks Benchmarks/MallocBench/perl Applications/sgefa However, they also fail in the exact same way without my change. OptimizerEval appears to be non-deterministic; it produces different output each time it runs. Everything else passes. I also compared a few *.s files generated by the tests, with a...

...MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount/automotive-bitcount.exec ution_time (497 of 986) FAIL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-fft.execution_time (498 of 986) FAIL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/voronoi/voronoi.execution_time (499 of 986) FAIL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram.execution_time (500 of 986) FAIL: SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle.execution_time (501 of 986) Notice how the test numbers are consecutive (494-501). They all pass when Burg passes. paul On 2013-01-20 2:50 PM, "Redmond, Paul" <paul.redmond at intel.com&g...

Jeff, I tried the Benchmarks/Olden/power, Benchmarks/OptimizerEval, and Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks tests. They all worked with your patches. I suggest you update your tree :) The changes also survived all the Feature and Regression tests on Linux. So, your changes are committed. Thanks for the patches! Reid. On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 16:01, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Fair enough... The followin...

...ce/Applications/Burg >MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV >MultiSource/Applications/lemon >MultiSource/Applications/obsequi >MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount >MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT >MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/voronoi >MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram >SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame > >Everything is built off trunk. > >Has anyone else seen these failures and found a fix? Perhaps I'm missing >a dependency? There doesn't appear to be a linux machine on llvm.org/perf >to compare with either. > >paul...

...IL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/12-IOtest/iotest.execution_time (5 of 1104) FAIL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount/automotive-bitcount.execution_time (6 of 1104) FAIL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-fft.execution_time (7 of 1104) FAIL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram.execution_time (8 of 1104) FAIL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-flt/Reductions-flt.execution_time (9 of 1104) FAIL: SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle.execution_time (10 of 1104) FAIL: SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except.execution_time (11 of 1104) Plus 8...

...rkGame/n-body > +45.5% SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle > +10.0% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort > +10.5% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-3des/enc-3des > +10.9% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/heapsort > +11.7% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc > +12.0% MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/17-bintr/bintr > +55.2% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall Yikes! Do we know why these codes got so much worse? Even 5% is a big deal on x86. -Dave

...ve-bitcount/automotive-bitcount.execution_time This is also failing on x86, I think (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fnt/builds/14868/steps/make.test-suite/logs/fail.LLC) > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-fft.execution_time > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram.execution_time (8 of > SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle.execution_time I've also seen failures on these with x86, though they seem to be passing on the bot I linked to. I think I tracked down the last to a dependence on the exact output of the C library's ran...

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:14:18 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Jeff, > > I tried the Benchmarks/Olden/power, Benchmarks/OptimizerEval, and > Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks tests. They all worked with your patches. I > suggest you update your tree :) I was using the 1.3 release, though I did pull the current code from CVS to verify no other changes were made to those files. Unfortunately this machine is too underpowered to frequently rebuild LLVM. It was coll...

Hi all, I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for AArch64. As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB (AArch64, 128B on ARM). At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".

...omotive-bitcount/automotive-bitcount.exec > ution_time (497 of 986) > FAIL: > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-fft.execution_time > (498 of 986) > FAIL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/voronoi/voronoi.execution_time (499 of > 986) > FAIL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram.execution_time (500 > of 986) > FAIL: SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle.execution_time (501 of > 986) > > Notice how the test numbers are consecutive (494-501). They all pass when > Burg passes. Yeah, that's disturbing. Bumping this thread to keep s...

...ults: speedup: MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -11.5862% +/- 5.9257% slowdown: MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: 158.679% +/- 22.3212% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: 0.627176% +/- 0.290698% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: 57.5457% +/- 21.8869% I ran the test suite 20 times in each configuration, using make -j48 each time, so I'll only pick up large changes. I've not yet investigated the cause of the slowdowns (or the speedup), and I really need people to try this on x86, ARM, etc. I appears, however,...

...MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/g721/g721encode/encode | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/mpeg2/mpeg2dec/mpeg2decode | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2 | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ft/ft | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram...

...ow 0.94 -> 0.75 MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural 1.0 -> 0.9 MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm 1.06 -> 0.9 MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/treeadd/treeadd 11.44 -> 9.89 MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/tsp/tsp 1.14 -> 1.02 MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram 1.33 -> 1.23 SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/dry 7.32 -> 5.16 SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/fldry 8.02 -> 6.65 .... I'll have to write a script to compare the results, its boring and inaccurate to do by hand. Will go through the bugzilla tomorrow and see if I...

...-3.44% External/SPEC/CFP2006/453.povray/453.povray -2.50% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector -1.49% X86_64 results on Intel Xeon E5-2690: Performance Regressions - execution_time Change MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2 5.62% Performance Improvements - execution_time Change SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake -4.43% External/SPEC/CINT2006/456.hmmer/456.hmmer -2.50% External/SPEC/CINT2006/464.h264ref/464.h264ref -1.60% MultiSource/Benchmarks/nbench/nbench...

...0.5011 -2.2434646898166 Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-pc1/enc-pc1 0.1574 0.154 -2.1601016518424 Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-flt/ControlFlow 2.351 2.3012 -2.1182475542322 Benchmarks/MiBench/network-dijkstra/network 0.0296 0.029 -2.0270270270270 Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc 0.4764 0.4674 -1.8891687657430 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo 0.028 0.0275 -1.7857142857142 Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms 0.8088 0.7949 -1.7185954500494 Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/CrystalMk/CrystalMk 3.7015 3.6...

...s-C++/miniFE/miniFE.test | 0.85 | 0.86 | -0.62 | -0.62 | |MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C/Pathfinder/PathFinder.test| 0.73 | 0.82 | -1.09 | -1.09 | |MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft.test | -1.36 | -1.38 | 1.93 | 1.93 | |MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram.test | 17.81 | 17.89 | -16.35 | -16.35 | |SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/Shootout-hash.test | -9.30 | -10.31 | 0.10 | 0.55 | |SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/Shootout-lists.test | -2.97 | -2.97 | 8.82 | 8.82 | |------------------...

...t; MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural 1.0 -> 0.9 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm 1.06 -> 0.9 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/treeadd/treeadd 11.44 -> 9.89 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/tsp/tsp 1.14 -> 1.02 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram 1.33 -> 1.23 > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/dry 7.32 -> 5.16 > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/fldry 8.02 -> 6.65 > .... > Unfortunately, we just don't have enough man power to have performance be a release criteria at this time. We also need a b...

...MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -11.5862% +/- 5.9257% > > slowdown: > MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: 158.679% +/- 22.3212% > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset: 0.627176% +/- 0.290698% > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: 57.5457% +/- 21.8869% > > I ran the test suite 20 times in each configuration, using make -j48 each time, so I'll only pick up large changes. I've not yet investigated the cause of the slowdowns (or the speedup), and I really need people to try this on x86, ARM, etc. I appears...