search for: ptr_ring_resize_multiple

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "ptr_ring_resize_multiple".

2016 Jun 28
1
[PATCH net-next V2] tun: introduce tx skb ring
...ize(struct skb_array *a, int size, gfp_t gfp) { return ptr_ring_resize(&a->ring, size, gfp, __skb_array_destroy_skb); } +static inline int skb_raay_resize_multiple(struct skb_array **rings, int nrings, + int size, gfp_t gfp) +{ + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct skb_array, ring)); + ptr_ring_resize_multiple((struct ptr_ring **)rings, nrings, size, gfp, + __skb_array_destroy_skb); +} + static inline void skb_array_cleanup(struct skb_array *a) { ptr_ring_cleanup(&a->ring, __skb_array_destroy_skb);
2016 Jun 28
1
[PATCH net-next V2] tun: introduce tx skb ring
...ize(struct skb_array *a, int size, gfp_t gfp) { return ptr_ring_resize(&a->ring, size, gfp, __skb_array_destroy_skb); } +static inline int skb_raay_resize_multiple(struct skb_array **rings, int nrings, + int size, gfp_t gfp) +{ + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct skb_array, ring)); + ptr_ring_resize_multiple((struct ptr_ring **)rings, nrings, size, gfp, + __skb_array_destroy_skb); +} + static inline void skb_array_cleanup(struct skb_array *a) { ptr_ring_cleanup(&a->ring, __skb_array_destroy_skb);
2016 Jun 22
2
[PATCH net-next V2] tun: introduce tx skb ring
...gt;producer_lock, flags); + + old = __ptr_ring_swap_queue(r, queue, size, gfp, destroy); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&(r)->producer_lock, flags); kfree(old); @@ -387,6 +398,49 @@ static inline int ptr_ring_resize(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, gfp_t gfp, return 0; } +static inline int ptr_ring_resize_multiple(struct ptr_ring **rings, int nrings, + int size, + gfp_t gfp, void (*destroy)(void *)) +{ + unsigned long flags; + void ***queues; + int i; + + queues = kmalloc(nrings * sizeof *queues, gfp); + if (!queues) + goto noqueues; + + for (i = 0; i < nrings; ++i) { + queues[i] = __ptr_r...
2016 Jun 22
2
[PATCH net-next V2] tun: introduce tx skb ring
...gt;producer_lock, flags); + + old = __ptr_ring_swap_queue(r, queue, size, gfp, destroy); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&(r)->producer_lock, flags); kfree(old); @@ -387,6 +398,49 @@ static inline int ptr_ring_resize(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, gfp_t gfp, return 0; } +static inline int ptr_ring_resize_multiple(struct ptr_ring **rings, int nrings, + int size, + gfp_t gfp, void (*destroy)(void *)) +{ + unsigned long flags; + void ***queues; + int i; + + queues = kmalloc(nrings * sizeof *queues, gfp); + if (!queues) + goto noqueues; + + for (i = 0; i < nrings; ++i) { + queues[i] = __ptr_r...
2016 Jun 30
9
[PATCH net-next V3 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the
2016 Jun 30
9
[PATCH net-next V3 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the
2016 Jun 30
10
[PATCH net-next V4 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the
2016 Jun 30
10
[PATCH net-next V4 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the
2016 Jun 15
7
[PATCH net-next V2] tun: introduce tx skb ring
We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer and consumer. This patch tries to address this by: - introduce a new mode which will be only enabled with IFF_TX_ARRAY set and switch from sk_receive_queue to a fixed size of skb array with 256 entries in this mode. - introduce a new proto_ops peek_len which was
2016 Jun 15
7
[PATCH net-next V2] tun: introduce tx skb ring
We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer and consumer. This patch tries to address this by: - introduce a new mode which will be only enabled with IFF_TX_ARRAY set and switch from sk_receive_queue to a fixed size of skb array with 256 entries in this mode. - introduce a new proto_ops peek_len which was