search for: pte_error

Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "pte_error".

Did you mean: get_error
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 08/17] paravirt_ops - memory managment
...tart/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h =================================================================== --- clean-start.orig/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h +++ clean-start/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h @@ -55,50 +55,62 @@ extern unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAG */ #define PTRS_PER_PTE 512 -#define pte_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pte %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pte_val(e)) -#define pmd_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pmd %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pmd_val(e)) -#define pud_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pud %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__,...
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 08/17] paravirt_ops - memory managment
...tart/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h =================================================================== --- clean-start.orig/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h +++ clean-start/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h @@ -55,50 +55,62 @@ extern unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAG */ #define PTRS_PER_PTE 512 -#define pte_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pte %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pte_val(e)) -#define pmd_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pmd %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pmd_val(e)) -#define pud_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pud %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__,...
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 5/5] Mmu header movement.patch
...6/pgtable-2level.h --- a/include/asm-i386/pgtable-2level.h Thu Oct 19 03:11:37 2006 -0700 +++ b/include/asm-i386/pgtable-2level.h Thu Oct 19 03:16:36 2006 -0700 @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ #ifndef _I386_PGTABLE_2LEVEL_H #define _I386_PGTABLE_2LEVEL_H - -#include <asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h> #define pte_ERROR(e) \ printk("%s:%d: bad pte %08lx.\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, (e).pte_low) diff -r 8233e2c507d3 include/asm-i386/pgtable-3level.h --- a/include/asm-i386/pgtable-3level.h Thu Oct 19 03:11:37 2006 -0700 +++ b/include/asm-i386/pgtable-3level.h Thu Oct 19 03:16:36 2006 -0700 @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ #...
2008 Oct 09
0
[PATCH] Dom0: Fix bad pte at booting time
...ackport upstream kernel patch to fix Dom0''s bad pte bug. - In Dom0 kernel, at boot time, system will call bt_ioremap() to do mappings for the Boot Time Fix Memory region. Also system will call bt_iounmap() to unmap the memory region by setting phys=0. In this case, system will encounter pte_ERROR(). This patch backports the upstream kernel patch by Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, with commit: 70c9f590ffc3f959cc81c1a3cecb6b8133caf35d Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu <dongxiao.xu@intel.com> Best Regards, -- Dongxiao _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing lis...
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 5/5] Mmu header movement.patch
...6/pgtable-2level.h --- a/include/asm-i386/pgtable-2level.h Thu Oct 19 03:11:37 2006 -0700 +++ b/include/asm-i386/pgtable-2level.h Thu Oct 19 03:16:36 2006 -0700 @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ #ifndef _I386_PGTABLE_2LEVEL_H #define _I386_PGTABLE_2LEVEL_H - -#include <asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h> #define pte_ERROR(e) \ printk("%s:%d: bad pte %08lx.\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, (e).pte_low) diff -r 8233e2c507d3 include/asm-i386/pgtable-3level.h --- a/include/asm-i386/pgtable-3level.h Thu Oct 19 03:11:37 2006 -0700 +++ b/include/asm-i386/pgtable-3level.h Thu Oct 19 03:16:36 2006 -0700 @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ #...
2007 Oct 31
5
[PATCH 0/7] (Re-)introducing pvops for x86_64 - Real pvops work part
Hey folks, This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat, uh? This is the majority of the work. The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail miserably ;-) (and it was not yet
2007 Oct 31
5
[PATCH 0/7] (Re-)introducing pvops for x86_64 - Real pvops work part
Hey folks, This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat, uh? This is the majority of the work. The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail miserably ;-) (and it was not yet
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/4] Prep for paravirt: move pagetable includes.
...PAGE_MASK =================================================================== --- a/include/asm-i386/pgtable-2level.h +++ b/include/asm-i386/pgtable-2level.h @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ #ifndef _I386_PGTABLE_2LEVEL_H #define _I386_PGTABLE_2LEVEL_H - -#include <asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h> #define pte_ERROR(e) \ printk("%s:%d: bad pte %08lx.\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, (e).pte_low) =================================================================== --- a/include/asm-i386/pgtable-3level.h +++ b/include/asm-i386/pgtable-3level.h @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ #ifndef _I386_PGTABLE_3LEVEL_H #define _I386_PGTA...
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/4] Prep for paravirt: move pagetable includes.
...PAGE_MASK =================================================================== --- a/include/asm-i386/pgtable-2level.h +++ b/include/asm-i386/pgtable-2level.h @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ #ifndef _I386_PGTABLE_2LEVEL_H #define _I386_PGTABLE_2LEVEL_H - -#include <asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h> #define pte_ERROR(e) \ printk("%s:%d: bad pte %08lx.\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, (e).pte_low) =================================================================== --- a/include/asm-i386/pgtable-3level.h +++ b/include/asm-i386/pgtable-3level.h @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ #ifndef _I386_PGTABLE_3LEVEL_H #define _I386_PGTA...
2007 Aug 10
9
[PATCH 0/25 -v2] paravirt_ops for x86_64, second round
Here is an slightly updated version of the paravirt_ops patch. If your comments and criticism were welcome before, now it's even more! There are some issues that are _not_ addressed in this revision, and here are the causes: * split debugreg into multiple functions, suggested by Andi: - Me and jsfg agree that introducing more pvops (specially 14!) is not worthwhile. So, although we do
2007 Aug 10
9
[PATCH 0/25 -v2] paravirt_ops for x86_64, second round
Here is an slightly updated version of the paravirt_ops patch. If your comments and criticism were welcome before, now it's even more! There are some issues that are _not_ addressed in this revision, and here are the causes: * split debugreg into multiple functions, suggested by Andi: - Me and jsfg agree that introducing more pvops (specially 14!) is not worthwhile. So, although we do
2007 Nov 09
11
[PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!
Hey folks, Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. We didn't get that many comments from the last time, so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! >From the last version, the most notable changes are: * consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering concerns * consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing
2007 Nov 09
11
[PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!
Hey folks, Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. We didn't get that many comments from the last time, so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! >From the last version, the most notable changes are: * consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering concerns * consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing
2007 Aug 15
13
[PATCH 0/25][V3] pvops_64 last round (hopefully)
This is hopefully the last iteration of the pvops64 patch. >From the last version, we have only one change, which is include/asm-x86_64/processor.h: There were still one survivor in raw asm. Also, git screwed me up for some reason, and the 25th patch was missing the new files, paravirt.{c,h}. (although I do remember having git-add'ed it, but who knows...) Andrew, could you please push it
2007 Aug 15
13
[PATCH 0/25][V3] pvops_64 last round (hopefully)
This is hopefully the last iteration of the pvops64 patch. >From the last version, we have only one change, which is include/asm-x86_64/processor.h: There were still one survivor in raw asm. Also, git screwed me up for some reason, and the 25th patch was missing the new files, paravirt.{c,h}. (although I do remember having git-add'ed it, but who knows...) Andrew, could you please push it
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] x86_64 paravirt_ops port
...sm-x86_64/pgtable.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.19-quilt.orig/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h +++ linux-2.6.19-quilt/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h @@ -55,50 +55,60 @@ extern unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAG */ #define PTRS_PER_PTE 512 -#define pte_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pte %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pte_val(e)) -#define pmd_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pmd %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pmd_val(e)) -#define pud_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pud %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__,...
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] x86_64 paravirt_ops port
...sm-x86_64/pgtable.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.19-quilt.orig/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h +++ linux-2.6.19-quilt/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h @@ -55,50 +55,60 @@ extern unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAG */ #define PTRS_PER_PTE 512 -#define pte_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pte %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pte_val(e)) -#define pmd_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pmd %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pmd_val(e)) -#define pud_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pud %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__,...