search for: pt_msix_update_one

...read the address and use it as pirq number for the following mapping request to Xen. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> diff --git a/hw/pt-msi.c b/hw/pt-msi.c index f0fb3e3..b01744e 100644 --- a/hw/pt-msi.c +++ b/hw/pt-msi.c @@ -300,6 +300,14 @@ static int pt_msix_update_one(struct pt_dev *dev, int entry_nr) if ( !entry->flags ) return 0; + if (!gvec) { + /* if gvec is 0, the guest is asking for a particular pirq that + * is passed as dest_id */ + pirq = ((gaddr >> 32) & 0xffffff00) | + (((gaddr &...

...ter change affinity to vcpu1, interrupt still happen on vcpu0. And sometimes we got "/No irq handler for vector (irq -1)/" and panic. qemu-dm.log shows error: pt_msixctrl_reg_write: guest enabling MSI-X, disable MSI-INTx translation pci_intx: intx=1 pt_msi_disable: Unmap msi with pirq 4f pt_msix_update_one: Update msix entry 0 with pirq 4f gvec 59 pt_msixctrl_reg_write: guest enabling MSI-X, disable MSI-INTx translation pci_intx: intx=1 pt_msi_disable: Unmap msi with pirq 4e pt_msix_update_one: Update msix entry 0 with pirq 4e gvec 69 pci_msix_writel: Can''t update entry 0 since MSI-X is alre...

...0 pt_ioport_map: e_phys=c100 pio_base=9000 len=256 index=0 first_map=0 pt_ioport_map: e_phys=ffff pio_base=d000 len=256 index=0 first_map=0 pt_ioport_map: e_phys=c200 pio_base=d000 len=256 index=0 first_map=0 pt_msixctrl_reg_write: guest enabling MSI-X, disable MSI-INTx translation pci_intx: intx=1 pt_msix_update_one: Update msix entry 0 with pirq 4d gvec 59 pci_msix_writel: Error: Can''t update msix entry 0 since MSI-X is already function. pci_msix_writel: Error: Can''t update msix entry 0 since MSI-X is already function. pci_msix_writel: Error: Can''t upda...

Hi developers, I met some domU issues and the log suggests missing interrupt. Details from here: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/users/263938#263938 In summary, this is the suspicious log: (XEN) vmsi.c:122:d32767 Unsupported delivery mode 3 I''ve checked the code in question and found that mode 3 is an ''reserved_1'' mode. I want to trace down the source of this