Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "psycwlm".
2010 Feb 05
3
metafor package: effect sizes are not fully independent
In a classical meta analysis model y_i = X_i * beta_i + e_i, data
{y_i} are assumed to be independent effect sizes. However, I'm
encountering the following two scenarios:
(1) Each source has multiple effect sizes, thus {y_i} are not fully
independent with each other.
(2) Each source has multiple effect sizes, each of the effect size
from a source can be categorized as one of a factor levels
2013 Apr 09
2
Behaviors of diag() with character vector in R 3.0.0
...rs of diag() for character
vectors? Thanks.
Mike
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike W.L. Cheung Phone: (65) 6516-3702
Department of Psychology Fax: (65) 6773-1843
National University of Singapore
http://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/psycwlm/internet/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2009 Jun 04
1
Weighted Correlations
How can I calculate a weighted correlation between two variables in R?
The command "cor" does not have a subcommand or option for weighting observations.
Thanks!
josu
2010 May 03
1
Comparing the correlations coefficient of two (very) dependent samples
Hello all,
I believe this can be done using bootstrap, but I am wondering if there is
some other way that might be used to tackle this.
#Let's say I have two pairs of samples:
set.seed(100)
s1 <- rnorm(100)
s2 <- s1 + rnorm(100)
x1 <- s1[1:99]
y1 <- s2[1:99]
x2 <- x1
y2 <- s2[2:100]
#And both yield the following two correlations:
cor(x1,y1) # 0.7568969 (cor1)
cor(x2,y2)
2011 Jun 01
3
error in model specification for cfa with lavaan-package
Dear R-List,
(I am not sure whether this list is the right place for my question...)
I have a dataframe df.cfa
2011 Jan 07
1
Random Effects Meta Regression
Hi All,
I have run a series of random effects meta regressions on binomial outcomes
using the metabin function in R. Now I would like to conduct some random
effects meta regressions on the outcomes. Is there a command available which
will allow for me to test the impact of a certain variable on the relative
treatment effect from my meta regressions?
Many Thanks,
Steph
--
View this message in
2008 Mar 03
2
Constrained regression
Dear list members,
I am trying to get information on how to fit a linear regression with
constrained parameters. Specifically, I have 8 predictors , their
coeffiecients should all be non-negative and add up to 1. I understand it is
a quadratic programming problem but I have no experience in the subject. I
searched the archives but the results were inconclusive.
Could someone provide suggestions
2007 Jun 21
3
meta-analysis in R
I would like to combine time-series data to test for correlations and
interactions using random and fixed effects meta-analysis.
So, I am looking for the right packages and documentation.
I know about meta and rmeta packages of R.
Are there any more? What are the diffrences in brief?
Can you please suggest some references that could be used as a guide for
meta-analysis in R (or S-plus)?
2009 Feb 13
2
Meta-Analyisis on Correlations
Dear R-Community,
I'm currently trying to find a way to conduct a meta-analysis in R.
I would like to analyze data from mostly-cross-sectional survey-studies. The
effect sizes would be correlations.
The R packages "meta" and "rmeta" are, as far as I can see, set up for
analysis with effect sizes for differences (i.e. comparison of the
means/odds-ratios of experimental
2011 Aug 17
3
questions about "metafor" package
Hello,
I would like to do a meta-analysis with the package « metafor ». Ideally I would like to use a mixed model because I’m interested to see the effect of some moderators. But the data set I managed to collect from literature presents two limits.
- Firstly, for each observation, I have means for a treatment and for a control, but I don’t always have corresponding standard
2011 Mar 17
2
Incorrect degrees of freedom in SEM model using lavaan
I have been trying to use lavaan (version 0.4-7) for a simple path model,
but the program seems to be computing far less degrees of freedom for my
model then it should have. I have 7 variables, which should give (7)(8)/2 =
28 covariances, and hence 28 DF. The model seems to only think I have 13
DF. The code to reproduce the problem is below. Have I done something
wrong, or is this something I