search for: psuedos

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 186 matches for "psuedos".

Did you mean: psuedo
2009 Jun 08
1
Random Forest % Variation vs Psuedo-R^2?
Hi all (and Andy!), When running a randomForest run in R, I get the last part of an output (with do.trace=T) that looks like this: 1993 | 0.04606 130.43 | 1994 | 0.04605 130.40 | 1995 | 0.04605 130.43 | 1996 | 0.04605 130.43 | 1997 | 0.04606 130.44 | 1998 | 0.04607 130.47 | 1999 | 0.04606 130.46 | 2000 | 0.04605 130.42 | With the first column representing the
2010 Aug 26
3
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
Also there is a typo: it probably should read pseudo. Yuri
2010 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
On Aug 26, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Yuri wrote: > Also there is a typo: it probably should read pseudo. A pseudo instruction is used internally without llvm, but it does not correspond directly to a real instruction in the target architecture. Before emitting the final compiled code, all the pseudo instructions must be expanded to real instructions. If you're seeing that error, it means that
2002 Apr 02
1
Extract psuedo model matrix from nls?
Hi R-list, I'd like to extract the psuedo model matrix (derivative of fitted values wrt the parameters) from an nls object. Any suggestions? Thanks, Murray Jorgensen Dr Murray Jorgensen on leave from: Mathematics and Statistics Department of Statistics University of Victoria University of Waikato PO BOX 3045 STN CSC Hamilton, New Zealand
2010 Aug 26
3
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
On 08/26/2010 11:11, Bob Wilson wrote: > A pseudo instruction is used internally without llvm, but it does not correspond directly to a real instruction in the target architecture. Before emitting the final compiled code, all the pseudo instructions must be expanded to real instructions. If you're seeing that error, it means that something was not expanded. > So what is likely to
2010 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
On Aug 26, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Yuri wrote: > On 08/26/2010 11:11, Bob Wilson wrote: >> A pseudo instruction is used internally without llvm, but it does not correspond directly to a real instruction in the target architecture. Before emitting the final compiled code, all the pseudo instructions must be expanded to real instructions. If you're seeing that error, it means that
2010 Aug 26
2
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
On 08/26/2010 11:53, Eric Christopher wrote: > It basically means that a pseudo wasn't lowered to something that the jit can output before the jit was run. Is this on ToT? > I don't know what is ToT. 42 meanings listed here http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/TOT don't seem to apply. Yuri
2010 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Yuri wrote: > On 08/26/2010 11:53, Eric Christopher wrote: >> It basically means that a pseudo wasn't lowered to something that the jit can output before the jit was run. Is this on ToT? >> > > I don't know what is ToT. 42 meanings listed here http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/TOT don't seem to apply.\ ToT = "top of
2010 Aug 26
2
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
On 08/26/2010 11:53, Eric Christopher wrote: > Could you get it to print out the instruction when it happens? (just change the line above the error message to print it out to errs()). > > It basically means that a pseudo wasn't lowered to something that the jit can output before the jit was run. Is this on ToT? > Insn before the error: TCRETURNri64 %RAX<kill>, 0,
2010 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Yuri wrote: > On 08/26/2010 11:53, Eric Christopher wrote: >> Could you get it to print out the instruction when it happens? (just change the line above the error message to print it out to errs()). >> >> It basically means that a pseudo wasn't lowered to something that the jit can output before the jit was run. Is this on ToT? >>
2010 Aug 27
0
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
On Aug 27, 2010, at 3:43 PMPDT, Yuri wrote: > On 08/27/2010 12:13, Dale Johannesen wrote: > Here's what happens: > The first instruction created is RET. > SelectBasicBlock is called. > TCRETURNri64 is created from within it. > HasTailCall is set to true as you mentioned. > Cycle in SelectionDAGISel::SelectBasicBlock skips the rest. > > All like you described. But
2010 Aug 27
0
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
On Aug 27, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2010, at 11:34 PMPDT, Yuri wrote: > >> On 08/26/2010 13:17, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>>>> Insn before the error: TCRETURNri64 %RAX<kill>, 0, %RDI<kill>, %RAX<imp-def,dead>, %RDI<imp-def,dead>, %RSP<imp-use>, ... >>>> >>>> Odd. I thought
2010 Aug 27
0
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
On 08/26/2010 13:17, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>> Insn before the error: TCRETURNri64 %RAX<kill>, 0, %RDI<kill>, >>> %RAX<imp-def,dead>, %RDI<imp-def,dead>, %RSP<imp-use>, ... >> >> Odd. I thought TCReturn was being lowered. At any rate can you file >> a bug with the .ll file that causes this? > > It should be getting
2004 Jun 07
2
strange apparently data-dependent crash with large data (PR#6955)
I'm consistently seeing R crash with a particular large data set. What's strange is that although the crash seems related to running out of memory, I'm unable to construct a pseudo-random data set of the same size that also causes the crash. Further adding to the strangeness is that the crash only happens if the dataset goes through a save()/load() cycle -- without that, the
2006 Apr 30
1
Number of Clusters
Dear R users, I am interested in clustering in R. In SAS we have some criteria for determining the number of clusters using the PROC CLUSTER procedure, which are "CCC" cubic clustering criterion (Sarl 1981), Psuedo F (PSF), and Psuedo T square (PST). My question is do thsese criterion exists in R, I tried to search and got one hit (BIC) in Mclust, which I am aware of, any input is
2010 Aug 26
2
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:59 PMPDT, Eric Christopher wrote: > On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Yuri wrote: >> On 08/26/2010 11:53, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> Could you get it to print out the instruction when it happens? >>> (just change the line above the error message to print it out to >>> errs()). >>> >>> It basically means that a pseudo
2004 Jun 10
0
lsoda with arbitrary zero thresholds (with psuedo-solution)
Dear Hank, Last question first: really, only you can say for sure if 4e-281 and 5e-11 are small enough; it depends on the units you measure your state variables in. However, this strategy cannot get the state variables to exactly 0. Obviously, you could get closer to 0.0 faster by setting the derivatives even larger in absolute value. You may run into problems with the solver when the
2010 Aug 27
2
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
On Aug 26, 2010, at 11:34 PMPDT, Yuri wrote: > On 08/26/2010 13:17, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>>> Insn before the error: TCRETURNri64 %RAX<kill>, 0, %RDI<kill>, >>>> %RAX<imp-def,dead>, %RDI<imp-def,dead>, %RSP<imp-use>, ... >>> >>> Odd. I thought TCReturn was being lowered. At any rate can you >>> file a bug
2009 Jan 13
9
Updating multiple databases at the same time
I have an application that is load balanced. I have a master database which I update once a day. Then I push the raw mysql files to all other servers so they are the same as the master. This works fine, but there are a few situations where I need all databases to update in real-time. What would be the best way to achieve this in rails? Here is an example of what I am trying to do. I want to
2010 Aug 27
0
[LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?
On Aug 27, 2010, at 11:53 AMPDT, Yuri wrote: > On 08/27/2010 11:32, Yuri wrote: >> As I understand only one of TCRETURNri64 and RET should be created. >> I have sources of rev.112200. >> >> Here is the stack when TCRETURNri64 instruction is created: >> #1 0x0000000802c8b4e2 in llvm::MachineFunction::CreateMachineInstr >> (this=0x30eb000, TID=@0x803a78940,