Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "psrinfo".
Did you mean:
psinfo
2007 May 29
2
interrupt loading, intrd, and CMT
...g off interrupts that could
be handled simultaneously.) I''m assuming that this is the way the
kstats report, but again, I want to be sure that this is the design, and
not just a coincidence of the current implementations.
Here''s the output from the x86 machines I could find:
psrinfo -vp on a single socket Intel Core 2 Duo system:
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (0 1)
x86 (GenuineIntel 6F2 family 6 model 15 step 2 clock 1800 MHz)
Intel(r) Core(tm)2 CPU 4300 @ 1.80GHz
psrinfo -vp on an x4200:
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors...
2008 Feb 02
4
n00b question: Will xVM work on my hardware?
...ng to work?
Vid card: Nvidia Quadro M1600
wired NIC: Broadcom NetXtreme gigabit
wireless NIC: Intel 3945 ABG
# uname -a
SunOS appdev 5.11 snv_80 i86pc i386 i86xpv
# isainfo -x
amd64: ssse3 cx16 sse3 sse2 sse fxsr mmx cmov cx8 tsc fpu
i386: ssse3 ahf cx16 sse3 sse2 sse fxsr mmx cmov cx8 tsc fpu
# psrinfo -vp
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (0 1)
x86 (GenuineIntel 6FA family 6 model 15 step 10 clock 2400 MHz)
Intel(r) Core(tm)2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz
Thoughts?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
2009 Feb 24
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc (pre-release and svn sources) fails to compile on Solaris10/SPARC
.../gcc-4.3.2/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.3.2
> --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-mpfr=/usr/local Thread model: posix gcc
> version 4.3.2 (GCC)
>
>
Wow, where did you get a 4.3.x compiler for Solaris? Latest I've seen
packaged are 3.4.x and 4.0.x.
> [sudan at grad1: space2]$ psrinfo -v
> Status of virtual processor 0 as of: 02/23/2009 15:48:54
> on-line since 12/08/2008 10:47:54.
> The sparcv9 processor operates at 750 MHz,
> and has a sparcv9 floating point processor.
> Status of virtual processor 1 as of: 02/23/2009 15:48:54
> on-line since 12...
2007 Oct 31
3
virt-install fails in b75a
...nnectOpen() failed
# uname -a
SunOS SolxVSLA1.directtv.com 5.11 snv_75 i86pc i386 i86pc
# isainfo -x
amd64: tscp ahf cx16 sse3 sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc fpu
i386: tscp ahf cx16 sse3 sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc fpu
# psrinfo -vp
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (0 1)
x86 (AuthenticAMD 40F12 family 15 model 65 step 2 clock 2400 MHz)
Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2216
The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (2 3)
x86 (AuthenticAMD 40F12 family 15 model 65 step 2 clock 2400 MHz)...
2009 Feb 24
5
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc (pre-release and svn sources) fails to compile on Solaris10/SPARC
...****************************
[sudan at grad1: space2]$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs. Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Configured with:
../gcc-4.3.2/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.3.2
--with-gmp=/usr/local --with-mpfr=/usr/local Thread model: posix gcc
version 4.3.2 (GCC)
[sudan at grad1: space2]$ psrinfo -v
Status of virtual processor 0 as of: 02/23/2009 15:48:54
on-line since 12/08/2008 10:47:54.
The sparcv9 processor operates at 750 MHz,
and has a sparcv9 floating point processor.
Status of virtual processor 1 as of: 02/23/2009 15:48:54
on-line since 12/08/2008 10:47:56.
The sparc...
2010 Oct 14
0
AMD/Supermicro machine - AS-2022G-URF
...ing but they were about $250 each
* 8 x WDC-WD2001FASS-00W2B 2 TB WDC Black drives
the other:
* 8 x Samsung F3 1 TB - I''ll post those later when I have it hooked up
if anyone is interested
# uname -a
SunOS xxyyzz 5.11 oi_147 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
# psrinfo -pv
The physical processor has 12 virtual processors (0-11)
x86 (AuthenticAMD 100F91 family 16 model 9 step 1 clock 2100 MHz)
AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6172 [ Socket: G34 ]
# zpool list
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
rpool 928G 13.5G 914G 1% 1.00x...
2010 Aug 16
19
v2.0.0 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz.sig
As promised last Friday, here's the v2.0.0 release finally. I'm
cautiously optimistic that v2.0.1 won't (have to) be released for a few
weeks, since there was quite a lot of testing and fixing going on in the
RC stage.
Remember to read http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0
2010 Aug 16
19
v2.0.0 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz.sig
As promised last Friday, here's the v2.0.0 release finally. I'm
cautiously optimistic that v2.0.1 won't (have to) be released for a few
weeks, since there was quite a lot of testing and fixing going on in the
RC stage.
Remember to read http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0
2007 Jan 19
18
Cheap ZFS homeserver.
So after toying around with some stuff a few months back I got bogged down and set this project aside for a while. Time to revisit. <BR><BR>
Looking around there still is not a good "these cards/motherboards" work list. the HCL is hardly ever updated, and its far more geared towards business use than hobbyist/home use. So bearing all of that in mind I will need the
2013 Apr 16
1
update config.guess and config.sub to support aarch64
Hello,
would it be possible to update config.sub and config.guess to the latest versions (or at least version
from automake-1.13.1) in order to support new architectures based on the ARM 64 bit CPU?
Patch: http://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/openssh/openssh-latest-config.sub-config.guess.patch
Related Fedora bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=926284
Thanks,
Petr
2007 May 02
41
gzip compression throttles system?
I just had a quick play with gzip compression on a filesystem and the
result was the machine grinding to a halt while copying some large
(.wav) files to it from another filesystem in the same pool.
The system became very unresponsive, taking several seconds to echo
keystrokes. The box is a maxed out AMD QuadFX, so it should have plenty
of grunt for this.
Comments?
Ian
2007 May 14
37
Lots of overhead with ZFS - what am I doing wrong?
I was trying to simply test bandwidth that Solaris/ZFS (Nevada b63) can deliver from a drive, and doing this:
dd if=(raw disk) of=/dev/null gives me around 80MB/s, while dd if=(file on ZFS) of=/dev/null gives me only 35MB/s!?. I am getting basically the same result whether it is single zfs drive, mirror or a stripe (I am testing with two Seagate 7200.10 320G drives hanging off the same interface