search for: psrinfo

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "psrinfo".

Did you mean: psinfo
2007 May 29
2
interrupt loading, intrd, and CMT
...g off interrupts that could be handled simultaneously.) I''m assuming that this is the way the kstats report, but again, I want to be sure that this is the design, and not just a coincidence of the current implementations. Here''s the output from the x86 machines I could find: psrinfo -vp on a single socket Intel Core 2 Duo system: The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (0 1) x86 (GenuineIntel 6F2 family 6 model 15 step 2 clock 1800 MHz) Intel(r) Core(tm)2 CPU 4300 @ 1.80GHz psrinfo -vp on an x4200: The physical processor has 2 virtual processors...
2008 Feb 02
4
n00b question: Will xVM work on my hardware?
...ng to work? Vid card: Nvidia Quadro M1600 wired NIC: Broadcom NetXtreme gigabit wireless NIC: Intel 3945 ABG # uname -a SunOS appdev 5.11 snv_80 i86pc i386 i86xpv # isainfo -x amd64: ssse3 cx16 sse3 sse2 sse fxsr mmx cmov cx8 tsc fpu i386: ssse3 ahf cx16 sse3 sse2 sse fxsr mmx cmov cx8 tsc fpu # psrinfo -vp The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (0 1) x86 (GenuineIntel 6FA family 6 model 15 step 10 clock 2400 MHz) Intel(r) Core(tm)2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz Thoughts? This message posted from opensolaris.org
2009 Feb 24
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc (pre-release and svn sources) fails to compile on Solaris10/SPARC
.../gcc-4.3.2/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.3.2 > --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-mpfr=/usr/local Thread model: posix gcc > version 4.3.2 (GCC) > > Wow, where did you get a 4.3.x compiler for Solaris? Latest I've seen packaged are 3.4.x and 4.0.x. > [sudan at grad1: space2]$ psrinfo -v > Status of virtual processor 0 as of: 02/23/2009 15:48:54 > on-line since 12/08/2008 10:47:54. > The sparcv9 processor operates at 750 MHz, > and has a sparcv9 floating point processor. > Status of virtual processor 1 as of: 02/23/2009 15:48:54 > on-line since 12...
2007 Oct 31
3
virt-install fails in b75a
...nnectOpen() failed # uname -a SunOS SolxVSLA1.directtv.com 5.11 snv_75 i86pc i386 i86pc # isainfo -x amd64: tscp ahf cx16 sse3 sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc fpu i386: tscp ahf cx16 sse3 sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc fpu # psrinfo -vp The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (0 1) x86 (AuthenticAMD 40F12 family 15 model 65 step 2 clock 2400 MHz) Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2216 The physical processor has 2 virtual processors (2 3) x86 (AuthenticAMD 40F12 family 15 model 65 step 2 clock 2400 MHz)...
2009 Feb 24
5
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc (pre-release and svn sources) fails to compile on Solaris10/SPARC
...**************************** [sudan at grad1: space2]$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Configured with: ../gcc-4.3.2/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.3.2 --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-mpfr=/usr/local Thread model: posix gcc version 4.3.2 (GCC) [sudan at grad1: space2]$ psrinfo -v Status of virtual processor 0 as of: 02/23/2009 15:48:54 on-line since 12/08/2008 10:47:54. The sparcv9 processor operates at 750 MHz, and has a sparcv9 floating point processor. Status of virtual processor 1 as of: 02/23/2009 15:48:54 on-line since 12/08/2008 10:47:56. The sparc...
2010 Oct 14
0
AMD/Supermicro machine - AS-2022G-URF
...ing but they were about $250 each * 8 x WDC-WD2001FASS-00W2B 2 TB WDC Black drives the other: * 8 x Samsung F3 1 TB - I''ll post those later when I have it hooked up if anyone is interested # uname -a SunOS xxyyzz 5.11 oi_147 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris # psrinfo -pv The physical processor has 12 virtual processors (0-11) x86 (AuthenticAMD 100F91 family 16 model 9 step 1 clock 2100 MHz) AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6172 [ Socket: G34 ] # zpool list NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT rpool 928G 13.5G 914G 1% 1.00x...
2010 Aug 16
19
v2.0.0 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz.sig As promised last Friday, here's the v2.0.0 release finally. I'm cautiously optimistic that v2.0.1 won't (have to) be released for a few weeks, since there was quite a lot of testing and fixing going on in the RC stage. Remember to read http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0
2010 Aug 16
19
v2.0.0 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz.sig As promised last Friday, here's the v2.0.0 release finally. I'm cautiously optimistic that v2.0.1 won't (have to) be released for a few weeks, since there was quite a lot of testing and fixing going on in the RC stage. Remember to read http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0
2007 Jan 19
18
Cheap ZFS homeserver.
So after toying around with some stuff a few months back I got bogged down and set this project aside for a while. Time to revisit. <BR><BR> Looking around there still is not a good "these cards/motherboards" work list. the HCL is hardly ever updated, and its far more geared towards business use than hobbyist/home use. So bearing all of that in mind I will need the
2013 Apr 16
1
update config.guess and config.sub to support aarch64
Hello, would it be possible to update config.sub and config.guess to the latest versions (or at least version from automake-1.13.1) in order to support new architectures based on the ARM 64 bit CPU? Patch: http://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/openssh/openssh-latest-config.sub-config.guess.patch Related Fedora bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=926284 Thanks, Petr
2007 May 02
41
gzip compression throttles system?
I just had a quick play with gzip compression on a filesystem and the result was the machine grinding to a halt while copying some large (.wav) files to it from another filesystem in the same pool. The system became very unresponsive, taking several seconds to echo keystrokes. The box is a maxed out AMD QuadFX, so it should have plenty of grunt for this. Comments? Ian
2007 May 14
37
Lots of overhead with ZFS - what am I doing wrong?
I was trying to simply test bandwidth that Solaris/ZFS (Nevada b63) can deliver from a drive, and doing this: dd if=(raw disk) of=/dev/null gives me around 80MB/s, while dd if=(file on ZFS) of=/dev/null gives me only 35MB/s!?. I am getting basically the same result whether it is single zfs drive, mirror or a stripe (I am testing with two Seagate 7200.10 320G drives hanging off the same interface