Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "pseudop".
Did you mean:
pseudo
2020 Feb 06
2
compatibility with gnu binutils
...sn't make sense" -- support for ancient
> platforms, bugs, weird formatting, etc. We definitely take things on a case
> by case basis, there's no firm policy that we replicate all the bugs.
So given that we got around with this for years, how much use do
non-lower case assembler pseudops actually see?
Joerg
2020 Feb 06
2
compatibility with gnu binutils
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 9:15 AM James Henderson <jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk>
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 00:24, Jon Chesterfield via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> This doesn't sound right. GNU binutils have a large quantity of legacy
>> cruft, not least the redundancy between tools like readelf and objdump
>> which are