search for: pscp

...03 at 10:27:15AM -0700, Mike Bethune wrote: > Hello, > the new way this works breaks windows ssh clients using v1 (I know, who cares :) > since when these options are enabled and you connect w/v1, the server asks: > Password: > Response: > and I guess these clients (tested putty, pscp, vandyke) expect just "Password:" > > v2 is fine though. But it's still a pain because I have customers who need v1 or are too dumb to select v2 in their client. Also, pscp only uses v1 as far as I can see :( > > (Sorry if there's already discussion on this, I didn...

...roblem I can't find a solution for. I am on my third day of testing, researching, planning, and swearing. :) I need to set up a convenient way to synchronize a bunch of data over the network for backups. The server is FreeBSD and the client is Windows. Currently we are using PuTTY, Pageant, and PSCP to SCP the files over SSH. This has various problems which led me to look for better ways to synchronize the files, so of course I am looking into rsync! I am having considerable trouble getting this to work in an automated way because of the requirements: * Windows client -> FreeBSD server *...

...bmission from: (NULL) (137.208.41.103) In a vanilla R, version 2.3.1 or version 2.3.0 the following crashes: system("gzip.exe") where I did nothing, prior to this command, but change the directory to my other working directory where there's gzip.exe. Same happens for PUTTY's pscp.exe and other commands. Normally, I use a longer command line than the one above, but it also crashes with this short one. Makes no difference if I use Rgui.exe or Rterm.exe. Same result with "shell" instead of "system". With non-existing commands, I get > system("...

...key material problem -- originally I copied and pasted the keys from notepad into my SSH session to transfer them between machines, and I wondered if a non-printable character or a Windows linebreak had snuck in and messed things up. However I've now copied them directly between hosts using pscp.exe so I don't think it can be that. I'm using both RSA and ECDSA keys, and I believe it defaults to ECDSA usage in this version? Any ideas appreciated! I can provide configs if necessary but this didn't seem like a config problem, per se. Cheers, ---tim ********** Output from...

...w. Some background: My company makes an 'embedded' audio server box that runs Debian Linux, and one of the product's features is that users can upload files to the server via SSH, using their favorite SSH-compatible file-transfer program (e.g. command-line scp/sftp, CyberDuck, WinSCP, PSCP, etc). That works fine, but one issue we have is that this box needs to be robust in the face of uncontrolled shut-downs: in particular, since it is a headless "black box", our users expect to be able to just cut power to the box, without logging in and executing a "/sbin/shutdown...

Hi all, Is there an equivalent to predict(...,type="linear") of a Proportional hazard model for a Cox model instead? For example, the Figure 13.12 in MASS (p384) is produced by: (aids.ps <- survreg(Surv(survtime + 0.9, status) ~ state + T.categ + pspline(age, df=6), data = Aidsp)) zz <- predict(aids.ps, data.frame(state = factor(rep("NSW", 83), levels =

Hey. I'm also a bit concerned about this issue... On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 13:48 +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > Don't use > scp with untrusted servers. But that would effectively mean one has to toss scp. Reality is simply that most peers cannot be really trusted? just imagine all the administration work which is done from some user/admin's computer to countless servers (running

...oad for a 20GB file. Which takes, kinda long. I might start splitting the files in lower gigabyte chunks as well, though. Currently sending it to another host at 1MB/s which rsyncs it to the real target where I'm less concerned about how long it takes. But I'm sending it over with scp (pscp) because for some reason rsync is also rather slow here (maybe it's my computer). Scp has no partial option (how silly) but I can just rsync if it fails. Still, I wonder how other people are doing this, if they do something like this. Regards, Xen.

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Matt Garman <matthew.garman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: >>> At any rate, what I was looking at was seeing if there was any way to >>> simplify this process, and cut NFS out of the picture. If you need >>> only to push these files around, what

...es, kinda long. > > I might start splitting the files in lower gigabyte chunks as well, though. > > Currently sending it to another host at 1MB/s which rsyncs it to the real > target where I'm less concerned about how long it takes. > > But I'm sending it over with scp (pscp) because for some reason rsync is > also rather slow here (maybe it's my computer). > Scp has no partial option (how silly) but I can just rsync if it fails. > > Still, I wonder how other people are doing this, if they do something like > this. > > Regards, > > Xen. &...

I am having an issue with Putty v.60 with Pageant v.60 under Wine-1.1.5. The OS is Fedora 10 x86_64, and the Wine it the current RPM version for Fedora. It is not that Pageant or Putty is not working; both do load. Putty does talk SSH2 properly. The actual issue is that Keys that are loaded into Pageant v.60 are not available to Putty v.60 for authentication; I suspect that this due to

...SSH Version: -current Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: tai at urd.spidernet.to Trying to scp from pscp (v 0.49) on windows and openssh 3.1p1 on linux 2.2.16 to openssh 3.2.3p1 on linux 2.4.17. Shell is /bin/bash. If last line of .profile in account echo's something 'echo "stuff"', scp fails. Removing the echo line, scp succeeds. This bug does not exist if the target machine...

...chr to get the hostname and user.. thus it will end up with user 'user' and domain 'domain at domain'...which is unlikely to succeed. This bug exists at least in scp.c and ssh.c Workaround for ssh is to use ssh -l user at domain domain and for scp is to use another client. I use pscp on windows. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

You might try the free SSH client, putty (from: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/). It has a command line SCP client (pscp) that will allow you to securely copy the file from Unix box, under windows. I've used it and had excellent results. Good luck, Paul "Manish K" <manish.k at db.com> wrote: Hi I got the email-id from the web site. Kindly let me know whether we can use ssh to communicate b/w u...

Hi When compression is turned off in sshd ('Compression no') then trying to scp some file on that serwer ends with error: "Received disconnect from [some IP]: 2: Packet integrity error. lost connection" Using pscp (version for linux) or scp -1 helps. Is scp turning compression on even without -C ? -- Mariusz Gniazdowski

...> > > In a vanilla R, version 2.3.1 or version 2.3.0 the following crashes: > > system("gzip.exe") > > where I did nothing, prior to this command, but change the directory to my other > working directory where there's gzip.exe. Same happens for PUTTY's pscp.exe and > other commands. Normally, I use a longer command line than the one above, but > it also crashes with this short one. Makes no difference if I use Rgui.exe or > Rterm.exe. Same result with "shell" instead of "system". > > With non-existing commands,...

...u implicitly have the ability to upload files (i.e. packages) to the systems. A simple tool like netperf should have few (if any) dependencies, so you don't have to mess with mirroring the whole centos repo. Just grab the netperf rpm file from wherever, then use scp (I believe it's called pscp when part of the Putty package) to copy to your servers, yum install and start testing.

...is going to be pretty difficult to arrange. So my first impulse was to reply to say that this isn't possible in scp, but that the reporter should use sftp instead, and perhaps some day we'll make the scp client actually use the SFTP protocol under the covers (as is done by e.g. PuTTY's pscp). However, I then went to check that sftp behaves sensibly, and it has the exact same bug. Oops. Fortunately, I think this is easy to fix. The sftp client already keeps a list of the acknowledgements it's waiting for so that it can block in a loop until they've all arrived, and those ac...

Hello all, I believe we all can agree that scp is ugly protocol carried for ages only for its simplicity of its usage and really no dependencies as it is installed together with every ssh client. But as we have seen recently, its simplicity and flexibility comes with security issues [1], it does not have great performance and there is really no development in there. Over the years, we still keep

...SH Corp. Ben Colin Watson wrote on 1/23/19 12:00 PM: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 06:29:29PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: >> So isn't it possibly to fully fix scp? > IMO a complete fix should involve converting scp to use the SFTP > protocol under the hood. PuTTY's pscp takes this approach. I started > working on a similar patch to OpenSSH some years ago but never got > around to finishing it. > > (Yes, a traditional scp client invokes scp on the server as part of its > protocol; but it passes special -f or -t options when it does so, so > that...