search for: pscnv

On 04/11/15 09:08, cbergstrom at pathscale.com wrote: > Is anyone actually and or actively working on this? > Github.com/pathscale/pscnv is totally bitrot but waaay more portable > base. Nouveau made hard Linux assumptions that will be difficult to > overcome afaik. As pointed out by Ilia, this is not true anymore. Nouveau can also partially run in the userspace, the hard dependencies on Linux have been abstracted. Also,...

On 04/11/15 10:38, C Bergström wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote: >> On 04/11/15 09:08, cbergstrom at pathscale.com wrote: >> >> Is anyone actually and or actively working on this? >> Github.com/pathscale/pscnv is totally bitrot but waaay more portable base. >> Nouveau made hard Linux assumptions that will be difficult to overcome >> afaik. >> >> >> As pointed out by Ilia, this is not true anymore. Nouveau can also partially >> run in the userspace, the hard dependencie...

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote: > On 04/11/15 09:08, cbergstrom at pathscale.com wrote: > > Is anyone actually and or actively working on this? > Github.com/pathscale/pscnv is totally bitrot but waaay more portable base. > Nouveau made hard Linux assumptions that will be difficult to overcome > afaik. > > > As pointed out by Ilia, this is not true anymore. Nouveau can also partially > run in the userspace, the hard dependencies on Linux have been abs...

...10:38, C Bergström wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> wrote: > >>On 04/11/15 09:08, cbergstrom at pathscale.com wrote: > >> > >>Is anyone actually and or actively working on this? > >>Github.com/pathscale/pscnv is totally bitrot but waaay more portable base. > >>Nouveau made hard Linux assumptions that will be difficult to overcome > >>afaik. > >> > >> > >>As pointed out by Ilia, this is not true anymore. Nouveau can also partially > >>run in the users...

Any progress on the FreeBSD front? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20151103/53a1688d/attachment.html>

...and rpmbuild -bp 2. what is the proper place for the new .config, taking into account the target arch 3. is there a missing directory rename and tarball re-roll ------------- Not unexpectedly, these are raised in the context of packaging and getting to a non-root build of pathscale's pscnv 'gpgpu module' as raised on another mailing list earlier this week I raise them here [centos-docs ML] rather than adding QUERY in the articles -- Russ herrold