search for: przemyslaw

Hi, I am posting my question to both storage-discuss and zfs-discuss as I am not quite sure what is causing the messages I am receiving. I have recently migrated my zfs volume from b104 to b134 and upgraded it from zfs version 14 to 22. It consist of two zvol''s ''vol01/zvol01'' and ''vol01/zvol02''. During zpool import I am getting a non-zero exit code,

You could hardcode a register for the pseudo instruction to use in the td file. The register allocator will make sure not to clobber it. let uses = [ R1 ], defs = [ R1 ] in { def MYINST : Pseudo<> } On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:25 AM Przemyslaw Ossowski via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I have one more question regarding expanding pseudo instruction. > > These two Machine Instructions, which I mentioned earlier, have to be one after another, but also have to 'communicate' using any General Purp...

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 2:48 PM Przemyslaw Ossowski < przemyslaw.ossowski at googlemail.com> wrote: > Thanks Mehdi for the suggestion. > I want to customize handling of 'load' instruction during processing DAG, > but on IR level I want the 'load' to be treated in different passes as > common load. So I'...

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 3:51 PM Przemyslaw Ossowski via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > as I wrote in mu previous post I wanted to somehow mark one IR instruction > (in this particular case it would be 'load') during dedicated pass, which > will set the marking based on neighboring instructio...

Hi, for DAG-to-DAG instruction selection I’ve implemented a pattern, which creates from one SDNode two instructions, something like: def: Pat<(NEW_SDNODE REG:$r1), (INST_OUT (INST_IN), REG:$r1)>; where INST_IN doesn't accepts any inputs and INST_OUT accepts two inputs - one returned by INST_IN and REG;$r1. Is there any possibility to ‘Glue’ two instruction created

Hi, I'm a teacher and I have got 20 computers with Windows XP and server Windows SBS 2003 with Active Directory. I use AD to set policy tu WinXP and to authorize users. Is it possible to set up Samba to this instead AD? Can someone help me in this? -- Przemyslaw Adam Smiejek

...owerOperation is also called for custom legalizing nodes with legal types > after type legalization by both the vector op legalizer and the DAG > legalizer. In those cases LowerOperation is called directly and does not > call LowerOperationWrapper. > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 9:10 AM Przemyslaw Ossowski via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I see that for different targets in classes which inherits from >> TargetLowering there are implemented both methods: >> >> LowerOperation and ReplaceNodeResults >> >...

Hello, I’m looking for the best approach which would allow for marking given LLVM IR instruction during IR custom pass and later utilizing that information during DAG Instruction Selection in order to match given pattern based on this marking. I’m wondering if marking IR instruction utilizing Metadata is good idea. But how later pass that information to DAG and appropriately mark in

...nk it takes much time to compile a few lines of a script using (f)lex/bison-or-yacc parser. Yes, I've noticed the sieve-manage patch, but I don't want the complexity of managing sieve script over the socket connection (if my understanding of the script is wrong, please correct me). BR, Przemyslaw

Hello, I'd like to clone existing CentOS server. Can anybody recommend any working solution to achieve that ? Regards Przemyslaw Bak (przemol) -- http://przemol.blogspot.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wygraj nawigacje GPS! 14 sztuk czeka. Sprawdz >> http://link.interia.pl/f22f3

...to run several scripts to check if these software works after update. Sometimes we forget ... It it possible to configure any sort of triggers which will run automatically after 'yum update' ? I'd like to avoid writing shell wrappers for yum and looking for yum-way solution ;-) Regards Przemyslaw Bak (przemol) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wyprzedaz do -70%!!! Wejdz na Endo.pl http://linkint.pl/f2791

...members. Server: Red hat 9, kernel 2.4.20-31.9, Samba 3.0.7, unix extensions enabled Client: Red hat 9, kernel 2.4.20-31.9, shares mounted via smbfs or cifs (the same behaviour). Is that all normal or did I do something wrong ? I'll appreciate your comments and suggestions. Best regards, Przemyslaw Tokarski Lodz, Poland

Hi, I see that for different targets in classes which inherits from TargetLowering there are implemented both methods: LowerOperation and ReplaceNodeResults What decides that for one given ISD we have to add handling in LowerOperation and for other in ReplaceNodeResults, when for both SetOperationAction is configured to be Custom? Is it related with number of results of given operation and

Hi all, my question is maybe not directly related with LLVM but general with compilers. The common approach is that compilers often don't align stack pointer for leaf functions if the function utilizes stack just for keeping variables of small sizes. I’m wondering what is the benefit of such behavior. Is saving a few bytes of the stack just once worth of such approach? Or maybe

...nt code page = 852 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log lm announce = true admin users = jk max log size = 5000 [disk_l] writeable = yes create mask = 0640 directory mask = 0750 path = /server/disk_l I would appreciate any suggestions as to how to resolve the aforementioned problem. Best regards, Przemyslaw Tokarski Lodz, Poland

...var/cache/samba/ and I rejoin to domain: net rpc getsid; net rpc join -U Administrator%password; all works OK root@komp15l:~# wbinfo --sequence MENIS : 8916 root@komp15l:~# until system reboot. I'm depressed, because this is my classroom and I need it to work OK. Please, Help Me.... -- Przemyslaw Adam Smiejek

...9;, reboot and if something is wrong we rollback the snapshot. On physical servers we cannot do that. I have read about rollback option of rpm but not sure if this is reliable solution. What is your best practise regarding "rollbacking" 'yum update' on physical servers ? Regards Przemyslaw Bak (przemol)

Hi Everyone, http://vuxml.freebsd.org/c4b025bb-f05d-11d8-9837-000c41e2cdad.html A critical vulnerability was found in lukemftpd, which shipped with some FreeBSD versions (4.7 and later). However, with the exception of FreeBSD 4.7, lukemftpd was not built and installed by default. So, unless you are running FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE or specified WANT_LUKEMFTP when building FreeBSD from source, you

...verity: critical >Priority: high >Responsible: bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Sat Dec 20 15:50:02 GMT 2003 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Przemyslaw Frasunek >Release: 3.3-RELEASE >Organization: net >Environment: System : OpenBSD 3.3 Architecture: OpenBSD.i386 Machine : i386 >Description: Sending a packet containg 0xff,0x02 bytes to port 1701/udp causes a L2TP protocol parser in tcpdump to enter an infinite loop...

Hello. My situation looks like: localnet 10.2.1.0/24 | 10.2.1.1 eth0 (100Mbit) gateway ppp0 (DSL 1MBit/256kbit) | internet On gateway I have some transparent proxy services. I would like to shape traffic incoming from internet and guarantee some bandwidth for non proxy services. When I shape traffic I shape proxy services too. What I can do? With regards Xperience