Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "prxxxxx".
2020 Apr 20
2
RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
> Can we preserve the existing bug numbers if we migrate this way? There are lots of references to "PRxxxxx" in checked in LLVM artifacts and elsewhere in the world, as well as links to llvm.org/PRxxxxx, and if we can preserve all the issue numbers this would ease the transition pain substantially.
Well... I hate to say this, but quite unlikely. Unfortunately, there
were significant changes in GitHu...
2020 Apr 20
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
> If we are reasonably certain that no one would be opening new issues on GitHub while the migration is running...
And pull requests (the numbering is common for issues and pull
requests) as well. And we cannot disable pull requests at all. And I'm
afraid the issues will need to be opened as well during the migration.
And now the real problem: should an "extra" pull request or
2020 Apr 20
5
RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
...ame time.
>> Closed or inactive bugs would be archived into their own GitHub
>> repository, and active bugs
>> would be migrated to the llvm-project repo.
>>
>
> Can we preserve the existing bug numbers if we migrate this way? There are
> lots of references to "PRxxxxx" in checked in LLVM artifacts and elsewhere
> in the world, as well as links to llvm.org/PRxxxxx, and if we can
> preserve all the issue numbers this would ease the transition pain
> substantially.
>
>
>> The key difference between proposal 1,2 and 3, is when bugs will be...
2020 Apr 21
5
[cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
...d or inactive bugs would be archived into their own GitHub
>>> repository, and active bugs
>>> would be migrated to the llvm-project repo.
>>>
>>
>> Can we preserve the existing bug numbers if we migrate this way? There
>> are lots of references to "PRxxxxx" in checked in LLVM artifacts and
>> elsewhere in the world, as well as links to llvm.org/PRxxxxx, and if we
>> can preserve all the issue numbers this would ease the transition pain
>> substantially.
>>
>>
>>> The key difference between proposal 1,2 and...
2020 Apr 22
5
[cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
...ould be archived into their own
> GitHub repository, and active bugs
> >> would be migrated to the llvm-project repo.
> >>
> >>
> >> Can we preserve the existing bug numbers if we migrate this
> way? There are lots of references to "PRxxxxx" in checked in LLVM artifacts
> and elsewhere in the world, as well as links to llvm.org/PRxxxxx <
> http://llvm.org/PRxxxxx>, and if we can preserve all the issue numbers
> this would ease the transition pain substantially.
> >>
> >>
> >>...
2020 Apr 22
5
[cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
...ctive bugs would be archived into their own GitHub repository, and active bugs
>>> would be migrated to the llvm-project repo.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can we preserve the existing bug numbers if we migrate this way? There are lots of references to "PRxxxxx" in checked in LLVM artifacts and elsewhere in the world, as well as links to llvm.org/PRxxxxx <http://llvm.org/PRxxxxx>, and if we can preserve all the issue numbers this would ease the transition pain substantially.
>>>
>>>
>>> The key...
2020 Apr 20
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
...ld be more
> complex than just rewriting the URL.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:25 PM Anton Korobeynikov
> <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> >
> > > Can we preserve the existing bug numbers if we migrate this way? There
> are lots of references to "PRxxxxx" in checked in LLVM artifacts and
> elsewhere in the world, as well as links to llvm.org/PRxxxxx, and if we
> can preserve all the issue numbers this would ease the transition pain
> substantially.
> > Well... I hate to say this, but quite unlikely. Unfortunately, there
> >...
2020 Apr 22
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
...archived into their own GitHub repository, and active bugs
> >>> would be migrated to the llvm-project repo.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Can we preserve the existing bug numbers if we migrate this way? There are lots of references to "PRxxxxx" in checked in LLVM artifacts and elsewhere in the world, as well as links to llvm.org/PRxxxxx <http://llvm.org/PRxxxxx> <http://llvm.org/PRxxxxx <http://llvm.org/PRxxxxx>>, and if we can preserve all the issue numbers this would ease the transition pain substantially.
> &...
2020 Apr 20
12
RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]
Hi,
I wanted to continue discussing the plan to migrate from Bugzilla to Github.
It was suggested that I start a new thread and give a summary of the proposal
and what has changed since it was originally proposed in October.
== Here is the original proposal:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/136162.html
== What has changed:
* You will be able to subscribe to notifications