search for: provokes

I always forget those CC's :(( ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 18:39:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Igmar Palsenberg <i.palsenberg at jdimedia.nl> To: zack at wolery.cumb.org Subject: Re: Work around Linux kernel bug provoked by nchan.c Hi, Regarding this bug : the man page states : On success, zero is returned. On error, -1 is returned and errno is set

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66642 Priority: medium Bug ID: 66642 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [nva5] Wrong provoking vertex is selected for flat attribute interpolation (clipping?) Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter:

Hello, here is a preliminary patch allowing rsync 2.5.6 to compile in BeOS (using the new BONE networking stack). Some explanations: - BeOS doesn't have chroot(), - the BONE networking stack export legacy network function for old apps in libnet.so (linked to by default), so it's necessary to force linking to the new libraries for things to work. I've yet to get inet_ntop() to be

I'm doing some work in C with the R_ExternalPointer interface, and having some seg fault problems. I expect the crash is my fault, bad pointer in my code causing a fault later etc, but I'm curious about the point of failure. R almost always falls over in a call to unzReadCurrentFile following a burst of disk activity. I'm definitely not doing anything that would call that

This problem is with R 1.7.0 (as released) on Linux and Solaris. Details below are from Linux, Mandrake 9.1. The problem also happened with R 1.6.2 and on Mandrake 9.0. Vignettes often (for me) provokes problems with the misleading error message: * creating vignettes ... ERROR Error in sub(pattern, replacement, x, ignore.case, extended) : invalid argument Error in buildVignettes(dir = ".") : Error in sub(pattern, replacement, x, ignore.case, extended) : invalid argument...

I have found what seems to be a bug in warning(), but perhaps I'm being really boneheaded (it's happened before). Essentially, warning() seems to segfault if its argument is greater than 8191 characters (8192 is defined as BUFSIZE in errors.c, so a quick workaround would be to boost this ...) The bug was initially provoked by trying to concatenate two long tables -- the warning message

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:56:21PM +0000, Always Learning wrote: > Of course Alice can. All of us can. Hopefully it is constructive > criticism. Seeing good software being replaced by less good, less > useful and more awkward software usually provoke the software's users to > protest. Complaining on the CentOS list is probably not that productive, though. -- Jonathan Billings

Since today is American Thanksgiving, I want to thank: (a) R-core for all of their efforts to produce what is, IMHO, the best statistical software around, not simply for the convenience of doing more, better, quicker, but also because it changes the landscape in the way one thinks about data analysis. It's a fantastic playground for a statistician and I enjoy using it

7.8 branch (533b7663) : 209/246 master branch (c882c31) : 216/241 In short : 8 fail/warn -> pass 5 fail -> skip 1 pass -> fail So the only regression is glean/clipFlat Output: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Test clipping with flat shading (provoking vertex). clipFlat: Failure for glBegin/End(GL_QUADS), glFrontFace(GL_CCW) GL_EXT_provoking_vertex

Hi! We want to use cygwin rsync to implement an autoupgrade feature for our software. For that we invoke rsync to connect to an anonymous rsync server on the default rsync port (873). This works just fine but there is one problem. When rsync is invoked the Windows firewall displays a message like this: "To help protect your computer, Windows Firewall has blocked this program from

The Linux implementation of TCP sockets has a bug which causes shutdown(sock, SHUT_RD) to fail spuriously (ENOTCONN) if the write side of the socket has already been shut down. If you are using SSH port forwarding to tunnel HTTP through a firewall, nchan.c will tickle this bug once for every HTTP exchange. You will therefore get lots of useless, annoying error messages: channel 2:

...yering.net <mailto:jim at meyering.net>> > Date: Monday, April 2, 2018 at 8:40 PM > To: "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> > Subject: [llvm-dev] trivial input provokes failed assertion in Parser.h:322 > > While attempting to reduce a ubsan-specific bug, I stumbled upon the following. <> > [I would have filed a bug report, but don't have an account, and so > requested one per https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.or...

e.g. class Asset < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :asset_number, :make, :model, :location, :name, :serial_number validates_numericality_of :asset_number validates_uniqueness_of :asset_number belongs_to :user belongs_to :location belongs_to :asset_type, :foreign_key => ''type_id'' end class Location < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :name

I see that kvm has been updated since Sept. 08 2007, and qemu hasn't since Sept. 12 2007. I understand that redhat is migrating from xen to kvm, I'm curious if that has provoked this reduced maintenance or if interest was just lost. If this is of interest to others, Qemu 0.9.1 does provide a lot more features lacking in 0.9.0 that I would like to use, including virtio and e1000 NIC

Hi, sorry I don't know if I send this to the correct channel. I have notice that OpenSSH has recognized the presence of the user enumeration as a vulnerability, http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Jul/51 (CVE-2016-6210). I want to make an appreciation, this is a old vulnerability already announced three years ago.

Hi all, Reading the wikipedia page on R, I stumbled across the following: http://fluff.info/blog/arch/00000172.htm It does seem interesting that the C execution is that much slower from R than from a native C program. Could any of the more technically knowledgeable people explain why this is so? The author also have some thought-provoking opinions on R being no-good and that you should write

Hi folks, I've got an idea for something I may be able to do as a Link-Time- Optimization pass, but I can't seem to find how LTO gets used. My crude approach has been to compile LLVM for debugging, and then run gdb on llvm-ld with -O5 and two .bc files, trying to catch LTO in action. I've also scanned the compiled tools, and none of them appear to use the symbol

Hi all I thought I would let you people know of a script that I coded that facilitates security patch updating on FreeBSD. When I wrote it I decided to called it Quickpatch for some reason even though because its source based its not necessarily the least bit quick at all :) I had kept it for my self for a while but I was recently provoked to release it as it could do greater good being out

...s at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Jim Meyering via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Reply-To: Jim Meyering <jim at meyering.net> Date: Monday, April 2, 2018 at 8:40 PM To: "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [llvm-dev] trivial input provokes failed assertion in Parser.h:322 While attempting to reduce a ubsan-specific bug, I stumbled upon the following. [I would have filed a bug report, but don't have an account, and so requested one per https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtN...

I have a list of TimeSheet objects from an ealier AR query, which I can sort by the full name of the user like so: @time_sheet_entries.sort! { |a,b| a.user.full_name <=> b.user.full_name } I can sort by the started time like so: @time_sheet_entries.sort! { |a,b| a.start_time <=> b.start_time } My question is how do I do a sort so that the list is sorted primarily by user.full_name