search for: provisionally

We are happy to announce the first public release candidate of our Puppet Cloud Provisioner. This release is available for download at our Module Forge: http://forge.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs/cloud_provisioner<http://downloads.puppetlabs.com/dashboard/> Extensive documentation can be found at: http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/cloud_pack_getting_started.html Please report feedback via the

I used the "FreePBX on Debian" HowTo at http://powerontech.com/freepbx-on-debian.htm to install. I use callfiles to initiate calls to my SIP carrier. They get my registration, but they see that my call is interrupted before they can complete the connection. My Asterisk log shows that the call times out after the time (45s) specified in my dialplan Dial() command. What is wrong? [from

Hi, I'm using the Perl AGI interface for a prepaid card platform. And sometimes (almost twice an hour), asterisk doesn't detect a call has been hung up. The call is so hung up when the time limit for the call is reached (the corresponding prepaid card is then emptied ...). I've tried to look in the asterisk log files to find anything suspect with these calls, and I've found a

Hi, I am using the cloud provisioner to bootstrap some ec2 nodes, and these clients are signed using a randomly generated certname, which is put in /etc/puppet.conf at the bootstrap time (eg certname = d7bcd693-73fd-495f-0876-ff91ea11111e). But my puppet code repo also manages the puppet.conf file, so the file will be overwritten on the client at the first puppet run. Nevertheless, i should not

...I tried the following but it does not work. I defined answer3 to hold the result by first: >answer3<-answer2 and then: > for(i in 1:1537){if(answer2[i,1]==answer2[i,2]){answer3[-i,]}} Why doesn't this work? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/deleting-rows-provisionally-tp23209365p23209365.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi Guys, I''m unable to load the module cloud provisioner, when I try to run node_aws it gives me the below errors: Error: Could not autoload puppet/face/node_aws/list_keynames: no such file to load -- guid Error: Could not parse application options: Could not autoload puppet/face/node_aws/list_keynames: no such file to load -- guid And when I see the help list I can see the below

I have a very basic puppet install right now, running puppet master, with the dashboard and foreman on the same host, I have some legacy static nodes (nodes.pp) and now I am using puppet to provision nodes in EC2. I am running cloud provisioner .60rc1 and my question is what happens after a puppet node bootstrap? I''m running into some issues and maybe its just idiot user driving this

What would be ideal is to have the alloca instruction be able to allocate memory indifferent address spaces instead of only being in private. Micah > -----Original Message----- > From: Pekka Jääskeläinen [mailto:pekka.jaaskelainen at tut.fi] > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 1:17 PM > To: James Molloy > Cc: Villmow, Micah; Carlos Sánchez de La Lama; Ouriel, Boaz; pocl- > devel

Hi guys, > So it is valid SPIR, as the specification stands, to manipulate __local > variables as Constants in a way that is extremely difficult to undo. That > is, in order to transform SPIR to code that can run on a CPU, the > GlobalVariable (which is a subclass of Constant) must be replaced with a > dynamically calculated Value (which is not a subclass of constant). What about

Was... Bash$ puppet node create This "create" action no longer exists. Has it been depreciated? Is the only way to create a node through puppetmaser now? Thanks, D -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/g3lJoO-j_u4J. To post

Maybe it would be easier to provide a bitcode example of this problem. After thinking about this more, I'm not sure if this is applicable to SPIR itself. For you to have a constant GEP expression, you have to know the pointer size in order to correctly generate the expression. Since the pointer size itself is not known, I don't yet see how you can generate a constant expression that is

On 09/28/2012 07:45 PM, James Molloy wrote: > That would be a simple, reasonable restriction that would stop potentially > maliciously horrible test cases causing all CPU SPIR clients to write upwards of > a hundred lines of conversion code. Are you proposing to disallow the use of an IR instruction type to *possibly* avoid problems from the (slight) misuse of another LLVM IR construct?

Yes, it would. But I was concerned Micah was just going to write it off as an implementation detail, so I felt that I should offer a "less correct but less work" option for him to consider. Cheers, James On 29 September 2012 03:16, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > > On Sep 28, 2012, at 9:45 AM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > >

On 06/16/2016 06:57 PM, Richard Henderson via iovisor-dev wrote: > On 06/15/2016 10:14 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Richard Henderson via iovisor-dev >> <iovisor-dev at lists.iovisor.org> wrote: >>> This same value for EM_BPF is being propagated to glibc, >>> elfutils, and binutils. >> >> great! >> Can

Hi ppl, we've been using a header called X-Content-Duration on some applications to communicate between a client and a server about the duration of a video (or audio) file. I've just been told by some W3C people that we should not name HTTP headers (even if intermediate) with "X-". (see email thread excerpt below) Should we move forward and register a provisional header as

On Sep 28, 2012, at 9:45 AM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > You can easily simplify this problem with a restriction in SPIR: disallow ConstantExpr casts - no ptrtoint constant expression. Because GlobalVariables have pointer type, if you disallow converting their type to non-pointer type in a constantexpr, the number of constantexpr subclasses you have to deal with is

Indeed; I agree it is not an implementation detail as potentially valid SPIR could be almost untranslatable to valid code running on a target without dedicated workgroup-local memory. Micah: the problem can be distilled down to: __local variables in SPIR are represented as Constants (GlobalVariable : public Constant), but they are not in fact constant, for a device with no workgroup-local memory.

Carlos, AMD's OpenCL implementation(both CPU and GPU) has worked for years with the way SPIR represents locals. If there is problems with the representation then it is an implementation issue. One of the issues with using extra kernel arguments is that it requires extra validation and complexity at the runtime level that is not needed if it is handled internally by the compiler. That being

Micah, You're saying it works for you, but Clang doesn't currently anywhere near the range of horrible constantexpr constructs it is possible to create. You can "get by" at the moment with just handling ConstantGEPs, because of the way Clang works. But SPIR isn't restricted to Clang, and the problem is that it is *possible* (although not probable, or nice, but that is

On 09/26/2012 08:21 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > It is my view that this is an implementation detail and not an issue > with the SPIR spec. As SPIR is just a representation of a program in a > portable manner, it is up to the consumer of SPIR to correctly set up > the kernels based on the devices calling convention/ABI when the SPIR > binary is loaded for that specific device. The