Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "provider_offset".
2013 Oct 03
7
TCCLASSES vs Providers
Hi, I want to configure QoS in my shorewall conf but I have a doubt.
Now I am using tcrules with prerouting and with the file providers, like
this.
2:P 192.168.0.11 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 25
So, with this way I route my smtp traffic with my provider number 2.
Well, now I want to configure QoS with tcclasses and tcdevices, but if I do
that I need to use the MARK in the tcclasses
So, how
2012 Jan 11
0
Shorewall 4.5.0 Beta 3
...shorewall6-tcrules(5) for
details.
This column provides an alternative to the balance=<weight> option
in the providers file.
Example:
/etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf
MARK_IN_FORWARD_CHAIN=No
...
USE_DEFAULT_RT=Yes
...
TC_BITS=0
PROVIDER_BITS=2
PROVIDER_OFFSET=16
MASK_BITS=8
ZONE_BITS=4
Note: PROVIDER_OFFSET=16 and ZONE_BITS=4 means that the provider
mask will be 0xf0000.
/etc/shorewall/providers:
#NAME NUMBER MARK DUP INTERFACE GATEWAY OPTIONS
ComcastB 1 - - eth1 70.90.191.126 loose,balance...
2012 Jan 11
0
Shorewall 4.5.0 Beta 3
...shorewall6-tcrules(5) for
details.
This column provides an alternative to the balance=<weight> option
in the providers file.
Example:
/etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf
MARK_IN_FORWARD_CHAIN=No
...
USE_DEFAULT_RT=Yes
...
TC_BITS=0
PROVIDER_BITS=2
PROVIDER_OFFSET=16
MASK_BITS=8
ZONE_BITS=4
Note: PROVIDER_OFFSET=16 and ZONE_BITS=4 means that the provider
mask will be 0xf0000.
/etc/shorewall/providers:
#NAME NUMBER MARK DUP INTERFACE GATEWAY OPTIONS
ComcastB 1 - - eth1 70.90.191.126 loose,balance...
2012 May 08
19
Shorewall, TPROXY, Transparent Squid and Multiples ISP
Hello,
I wonder if someone could use the TPROXY with Shorewall and
transparent Squid with using the routing rules on shorewall
(tcrules) for hosts / networks (LAN) with multiples providers (WANs)
directly from the internal network on port 80 (with TPROXY
transparent squid or REDIRECT).
On this issue, the routing rules is not work propertly because the
source is the
2013 Jun 13
3
"Multiple Internet Connections" with four interfaces
Hi,
I was reading document http://shorewall.net/MultiISP.html#idp3634200.
Inspired by the document I was trying to establish the following changes:
* one additional interface: COMA_IF
* COM[A,B,C]_IF interfaces request IP address via DHCP
* all non-RFC 1918 destined trafic is NATed from INT_IF to COMA_IF
* all non-RFC 1918 destined trafic from GW is routed via COMB_IF by default
* non-RFC 1918
2013 Sep 10
6
lsm configuration issues...
...OMAP="2 3 3 3 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2"
TRACK_PROVIDERS=No
USE_DEFAULT_RT=No
USE_PHYSICAL_NAMES=No
ZONE2ZONE=2
BLACKLIST_DISPOSITION=DROP
MACLIST_DISPOSITION=REJECT
RELATED_DISPOSITION=ACCEPT
SMURF_DISPOSITION=DROP
SFILTER_DISPOSITION=DROP
TCP_FLAGS_DISPOSITION=DROP
TC_BITS=
PROVIDER_BITS=
PROVIDER_OFFSET=
MASK_BITS=
ZONE_BITS=0
IPSECFILE=zones
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/etc/shorewall/interfaces
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sdsl eth1 dhcp,tcpflags,routefilter,nosmurfs,logmartians,optional
free eth2 dhcp,...