search for: proven

Dear R users, I 'm working on a dataset consisting of 4 different dataframes with tree, leaf, fruit and seed measurements made on 300 trees, coming from 10 provenances (30 trees per provenance, 10 leaves/fruits/seeds per tree). Provenances are fixed effects (they were not randomly chosen), but trees within provenances and leaves/fruits/seeds within trees were randomly assigned. I wanted to check whether there were any between-provenance differences concernin...

...ear R-group, I am trying desperately to get this Tukey test working. Its my first time here so I hope my question is not too stupid, but I couldn't find anything helpful in the help or in the forum. I am analysing a dataset of treated grasses. I want to find out, if the grasses from different Provenances react differently. In the aov test I found a significance for the combination Treatment and provenance: summary(PAMaov<-aov(PAMval~Treatmentf*Pretreatmentf*Provenancef+Error(Datef/Code))) Treatmentf:Provenancef p-value: 0.008023 ** In the Linear fixed effects model lme, I...

...is unfortunate, it has various negative > connotations, e.g., the release notes that read: > "LLVM 10.0 now has sidechannel support for your restrict pointer" > will raise a lot of follow up questions. > > What I think we actually do, and what we should call it, is "provenance" > tracking. > > Now beyond the pure renaming of "sidechannel" into "provenance" (or sth. > similar) I want us to decouple provenance tracking from the noalias > logic. Noalias/restrict is one use case in which (pointer) provenance > information is us...

Hi Alexey, >From: Alexey Zhikhartsev [..] > We would love to see your patches merged as soon as possible, so I was wondering: do you think the lack of bitcode support will prevent that from happening? Yes, I think that the lack of bitcode support will prevent it. During the Developers meeting, I also talked with Hal and Johannes. They had some extra remarks: - (1) the restrict

...; is unfortunate, it has various negative > connotations, e.g., the release notes that read: > "LLVM 10.0 now has sidechannel support for your restrict pointer" > will raise a lot of follow up questions. > > What I think we actually do, and what we should call it, is "provenance" > tracking. > > Now beyond the pure renaming of "sidechannel" into "provenance" (or sth. > similar) I want us to decouple provenance tracking from the noalias > logic. Noalias/restrict is one use case in which (pointer) provenance > information is use...

On 01/28/2013 06:51 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > Is this sufficient to implement #pragma ivdep in clang? I'm not completely sure of this: "Note: The proven dependencies that prevent vectorization are not ignored, only assumed dependencies are ignored." http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/studio/composer/en-us/2011Update/compiler_c/cref_cls/common/cppref_pragma_ivdep.htm Thus, there's a slight difference. It cannot be used...

...; is unfortunate, it has various negative > connotations, e.g., the release notes that read: > "LLVM 10.0 now has sidechannel support for your restrict pointer" > will raise a lot of follow up questions. > > What I think we actually do, and what we should call it, is "provenance" > tracking. > > Now beyond the pure renaming of "sidechannel" into "provenance" (or sth. > similar) I want us to decouple provenance tracking from the noalias > logic. Noalias/restrict is one use case in which (pointer) provenance > information is use...

...t; is unfortunate, it has various negative > connotations, e.g., the release notes that read: > "LLVM 10.0 now has sidechannel support for your restrict pointer" > will raise a lot of follow up questions. > > What I think we actually do, and what we should call it, is "provenance" > tracking. > > Now beyond the pure renaming of "sidechannel" into "provenance" (or sth. > similar) I want us to decouple provenance tracking from the noalias > logic. Noalias/restrict is one use case in which (pointer) provenance > information is use...

hi all i''m trying to pass a variable name right round the block and need a hand to ease my aching brain. ##in my sidebar i have <li><%= SidebarItem(''catalogue'') %></li> <li><%= SidebarItem(''provenance'') %></li> <li><%= SidebarItem(''status'') %></li> ##linked to a helper def SidebarItem(name) link_to_remote "#{name}", :url=> {:action => name, :id => @work.id, :layout => false } end but...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nadav Rotem" <nrotem at apple.com> > To: "Pekka Jääskeläinen" <pekka.jaaskelainen at tut.fi> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 10:45:36 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [PATCH] parallel loop awareness to the LoopVectorizer > > Hi Pekka,

...Re: [LLVMdev] [PATCH] parallel loop awareness to the > LoopVectorizer > > > > On 01/28/2013 06:51 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > Is this sufficient to implement #pragma ivdep in clang? > > > > I'm not completely sure of this: > > > > "Note: The proven dependencies that prevent vectorization are not > > ignored, > > only assumed dependencies are ignored." > > > > > http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/studio/composer/en-us/2011Update/compiler_c/cref_cls/common/cppref_pragma_ivdep.htm > > &gt...

For those who come across this thread, I've found the exact list of changed and dropped package between rhel:7 and rhel:8: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8/html-single/considerations_in_adopting_rhel_8/index#package-replacements_changes-to-packages Too bad that the "note" column is empty in the dropped package table. NO word about reason or

...his scheme might solve/mitigate some of the scalability challenges associated with the pure-metadata solution. * The full-restrict implementation is being used, and Jerone is currently updating this implementation based on feedback from that usage, he also will update the implementation to use provenance instead of sidechannel and repost. * Johannes notes that we need more reviewers for this patch set. **** Thanks again, Hal Hal Finkel Lead, Compiler Technology and Programming Languages Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory ________________________________ From: ll...

...ccessing files is: 1: KERNEL /boot/S3P3/vmlinuz-3.2.0-4-486 2: INITRD /boot/S3P3/initrd.img-3.2.0-4-486 3: <mount applicable root> , I'll put the new krnl & initrd, in their own dir in usbA: to avoid the possible problem of usbB not being readable. from usbA So minimally modifying a proven entry on usbA:isolinux.cfg gives:- LABEL S3:P3:rootUseLABEL MENU LABEL video args for S3:P3 TEXT HELP Use proven Krn & initrd from S3P3 copied to own /boot/S3P3 ENDTEXT KERNEL /boot/S3P3/vmlinuz-3.2.0-4-486 INITRD /boot/S3P3/initrd.img-3.2.0-4-486 APPEND root=LABEL=New486Xfce ==> OK ! usbA...

...R). I refer "safe" to spatial safety (no out of bounds write) and not temporal safety (no double free() etc). My current approach would be to declare every pointer as unsafe that is computed somewhere by a GEP instruction with non constant indices, as well as constant indices that can be proven to be out of bounds (but that would be more a thing for the compiler to complain). Is that approach about right? Are there other situations where spatial safety might be violated? Are there already analysis that can determine something like this? Thanks you. Regards, Fredi

...reading for many days trying to predict with lmer but I haven't managed to do it. I've fitted an allometric model for trees where I have included climatic variables and diameter in the fixed part and in the random part I've included the experimental sites where trees are and also their provenance region. The model is like this : f431<-lmer(log(H05)~log(DN05)*(PwS+ PoS+ PpS+ TpS)+PoP:log(DN05)+PwP:log(DN05)+(log(DN05)-1|P)+(log(DN05)-1|S/B)+(log(DN05)|SP), data=data) once I 've fitted the model I would like to make predictions for a new data frame of values. But i don't kn...

Hi all: I'm testing a new installation of *, bringing up some ATA186. In * environment, all stuff works greats. The only thing that don't work is a Call Transfer, but the 3Party works ok. Some time ago I read that somebody had proven this functionality successfully. If somebody knows what I missing, please let me know. Thanks in advance, Gus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030818/6a255ba1/attachment.htm

...drivers=all" does not imply "--with-usb", and it was not registering that the libusb checks might be called regardless of whether --with-usb was set. I will do the testing and such, but I wanted to ask you before I work on a patch (especially since there is that "innocent until proven guilty" comment in there). -- - Charles Lepple

...nstructio encoding!). The new header has a proper magic number at a fixed location. Switch Xen itself to using this format. Neither the bootwrapper nor the models care about this header themselves and real bootloaders are not widely used, so now is as good a time as any to switch (as upstream have proven) Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> --- xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S index 1d04efc..5ffe4f4 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/head.S +++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/he...

Hey Timo, Just curious if you ever thought about supporting other than just OpenSSL? PolarSSL looks really interesting, has no major dependencies and is very lightweight compared to OpenSSL, GNUTLS or others... https://polarssl.org/ I guess it could be a lot of work, or not, anyway, I'm just curious... -- Best regards, */Charles/*