search for: prots

Hi, This is a question of a newbie getting into the exciting world of R. I have several dataframes in the same format as NAD: > NAD[1:3,1:3] Sample.Id Main.abs..1 Main.abs..2 148 10a 0.04836 0.04994 167 11a_1109 0.32245 0.36541 173 11b_1109 0.29293 0.32815 What I want to do is to replace the Sample.Id with a corresponding number.The number

Hi, I have some protein array data, each array in a separate text file. So I read them in and try to combine them into a single data frame by using merge(). see code below (If you download the attached data files into a specific folder, the code below should work): fls<-list.files("C:\\folder_of_download",full.names=T) ## get file names prot<-list() ## a list to contain

Hi, Trying to figure out why I cannot get access to dell.com Their site is up because I can browse using a different firewall. Trying to find out where the logs are located and what log files it would write to if it were to deny browsing to a website. I can see the [UNREPLIED] when using the shorewall status. Was hoping to know what logfile it is writing it to. Thanks in advance, Elmer

ip_forward was not enabled, now it is. Still same result: On VPN_office I use 'tcpdump -npi any icmp and host 192.168.1.1' and ping 192.168.1.1 from the client: 5:28:42.646203 IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id 1584, seq 1, length 64 15:28:43.663014 IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id 1584, seq 2, length 64 15:28:44.688133 IP 172.16.0.3 >

Firstly I don''t think this is a shorewall problem, but I suspect shorewall might be able to solve it for me. I''ve posted this so far at http://mandrakeusers.org/index.php?showtopic=18942 I''ve stumble upon a problem that has me stumped I have a multipath router using 2.6.8.1 with patches from here http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes basic setup: ___ ISP1

Hello, I have this problem: when my mail server on the DMZ starts a connection to the internet it''s ip (213.58.230.26) is "masqueraded" with the firewall ip (213.58.230.50). I wouldn''t mind but there is a one customer who rejects the connection because it makes reverse dns and finds no dns entry for the firewall ip. How can i correct this? Thanks, MSantos shorewall

Given an externalptr object 'pool' which protects an R object 'prot': # SEXP prot = (a dynamically updated list with handles) SEXP pool = R_MakeExternalPtr(p, R_NilValue, prot); R_RegisterCFinalizerEx(pool, fin_pool, TRUE); WRE explains that 'prot' remains in existence as long as 'pool' is around. Does this also mean 'prot' still exists when the

Hi, I have a big "name problem" with my internal mail server (10.0.0.152). It is "seen" on the internet through DNAT (213.58.230.27). Also there is a MX record pointing to the machine. Everything works fine from the outside. However i can''t set the mail clients on the lan pointing to the mx record, because this one points to 213.58.230.27 and the firewall

The internal mechanisms support this, but instead of exposting the gfp to the caller it wrappers it into iommu_map() and iommu_map_atomic() Fix this instead of adding more variants for GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT. Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com> --- arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 11 +++++++---- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/gk20a.c | 3 ++-

The internal mechanisms support this, but instead of exposting the gfp to the caller it wrappers it into iommu_map() and iommu_map_atomic() Fix this instead of adding more variants for GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT. Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com> --- arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 11 +++++++---- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/gk20a.c | 3 ++-

The internal mechanisms support this, but instead of exposting the gfp to the caller it wrappers it into iommu_map() and iommu_map_atomic() Fix this instead of adding more variants for GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT. Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com> --- arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 11 +++++++---- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/gk20a.c | 3 ++-

Hello Julien, Am Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:23 +0100 schrieb Julien dupont <marcelvierzon at gmail.com>: > In that case I see: > IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq1, length 64 > IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq2, length 64 > IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq3, length 64 > > Packet goes

Hello Tom and others on the list. Tom - you might recall that the other day (night) I had problems with my axip setup (protocol 93) and we made some changes to the policy, zones and interfaces files. You added ''peers and tunl+'' Following that change nothing seemed to work. In fact you wanted to see the shorewall status file, among other things. Well - tonight, I carefully put

Dear List! I use a shorewall 2.0.8 on a Debian sarge system. I use a DSL connection to the Internet (ppp0 - eth1 to the modem) and a bridge to the local lan. The bridged config i''ve made with bridge.html from the shorewall site. The Bridge is between local net and a openvpn tap device. This works. I ccan make tunnels, and a can make a lot of things through the firewall. I can get a list

(anonymous post) I have a simple 2 interface firewall setup and all is good, almost. I am hosting virtual websites and DNS behind shorewall no problem. However I am trying to use SFTP via a different port number and have no luck even though Putty works well. Is there anything weird to sftp and shorewall? My lab uses a different firewall (firestarter) and it works OK. I am using; DNAT net

I wonder if someone can tell me what these ''unknown'' remarks mean in my status file. They are only in the last portion of the file and are listed below. If they mean nothing, I will rest easy. But if not it means I need to fix something. Your thoughts would be appreciated. ---------------- udp 17 92 src=24.224.173.220 dst=24.222.0.75 sport=1027 dport=53 src=24.222.0.75

Hi, I am experimenting a little bit with my firewall and I don''t seem to get my head round marks ... I try to mark p2p packets generated on the firewall in the output chain and then try to match that mark either in NAT OUTPUT or POSTROUTING I don''t seem to get the expected result. Any help or clue would be more than welcome. root@droopy:~/firewall > iptables-view -t

Convert the AMD iommu driver to the dma-iommu api. Remove the iova handling and reserve region code from the AMD iommu driver. Change-log: V4: -Rebase on top of linux-next -Split the removing of the unnecessary locking in the amd iommu driver into a seperate patch -refactor the "iommu/dma-iommu: Handle deferred devices" patch and address comments v3: -rename dma_limit to dma_mask -exit

Convert the AMD iommu driver to the dma-iommu api. Remove the iova handling and reserve region code from the AMD iommu driver. Change-log: V4: -Rebase on top of linux-next -Split the removing of the unnecessary locking in the amd iommu driver into a seperate patch -refactor the "iommu/dma-iommu: Handle deferred devices" patch and address comments v3: -rename dma_limit to dma_mask -exit

Hi, I'm trying to configure nwfilter for KVM, but so far I haven't managed to figure out a working configuration. Network setup: The dom0 (Debian 7.1, kernel 3.2.46-1, libvirt 0.9.12) is connected via eth0, part of the external subnet 192.168.17.0/24, and has an additional subnet 192.168.128.160/28 routed to its main address 192.168.17.125. The host's subnet is configured as bridge