search for: protocol_versions

This is a PoC patch for NFSv4/ZFS ACLs. The objective of the patch is that rsync --acls support NFSv4/ZFS ACLs without requiring a new command line option NFSv4 ACLs can't be represented using POSIX draft ACLs, if an NFSv4 ACL is present a separate POSIX draft ACL will not be present and there are new APIs to access NFSv4 ACLs. So we need to distinguish between NFSv4 ACLs and POSIX ACLs in

In the past, I had restricted rsync so that the -e option was disallowed. As of rsync-3.0.0, I'm now seeing the following requests being made (on the server side): rsync --server -vlogDtprze.iL . I want to prevent '-e' as a client side option so arbitrary programs can't be executed. I found the following, but didn't trace through to verify exactly where I was in the code

It seems latest rsync pass -e to the remote server to specify rsync client is a preversion (A thing I understand because -e works on all rsync version). However, this cause problems on server having options restriction, like denying -e because it allow to execute any command on it. So I suggest this patch to limit effect to unstable version of clients. WDYT ? Regards. Index: options.c

Hello, Object of my mail : 1/ stick a problem of incompatibylity between 2 patches (fileflags.diff & detect-renamed.diff) 2/ proposition of a correction I wanted to run rsync on a mac (OS X 10.6.5) with the --detect-renamed option. I therefore tried to compile rsync with the 3 relevant patches : - fileflags.diff - crtimes.diff - detect-renamed.diff But the patch detect-renamed.diff is

Dear rsync experts, I'd like to ask you a couple of questions. ***** 1. ***** If I'd like to send additional metadata for each block, what would be the easiest and less intrusive way to do this? The following seems to work: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- diff -rupN ../rsync.git/token.c ./token.c --- ../rsync.git/token.c 2015-11-03

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 6:21 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 02:28:10PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > > > +# Create a background thread running a web server which is > > > +# simulating the imageio server. > > > > > > > This functionality should be separated from the fake SDK module, since > it is > >

Hi. Here's a patch for copying the atimes of files when -t/--times is given. I bumped the protocol to 29 since it sends more data over the wire. It obviously does not send the atime if it's sending data to an older rsync version. It passes all the tests (including the added atime.test) for me on a: Linux Debian/3.0 gcc 2.95.4 (debian), glibc 2.2.5 system. Any questions/feedback? I

In the bufferbloat age, anything that can make for a kinder, gentler bulk transfer protocol seems desirable. This add support for user and server selectable congestion control algorithms. As examples: --congestion-alg=lp # For the tcp-lp algorithm on the command line Or in a subsection: [mystuff] congestion alg = westwood # for a wireless connection And diffserv support: --diffserv=8 for

The generator can skip a directory's contents altogether due to --ignore-non-existing, a daemon exclude, or a mkdir failure. On a --dry-run, the generator can also note the missingness of a directory while still scanning its contents. These two scenarios were conflated using a single set of missing_below/missing_dir variables in combination with transient increments in dry_run; this caused

I was trying to use rsync to send files to a fileserver using an rssh restricted server. It refuses, saying that trying to override the shell with -e is forbidden. I didn't type "-e". When I look at the source, I see /* Checking the pre-negotiated value allows --protocol=29 override. */ if (protocol_version >= 30) { /* We make use of the -e

Hi, When using the latest rsync 3.1.0 client, connecting to a pre 3.1.0 (i.e. 3.0.9 and earlier, protocol version 30) server running in daemon mode and requesting a recursive (incremental by default) file transfer, the variable use_safe_inc_flist is not set (affecting how I/O errors are handled during file list generation). so it is set for: 3.0.9 client -> 3.0.9 daemon 3.0.9 client ->

...ings such as SSL_TXT_TLSV1_2 == "TLSv1.2" (from openssl/ssl.h) to the appropriate version and option defines of OpenSSL. Said openssl/ssl.h does not contain a SSL_TXT_TLSV1_3, so it?s no surprise that dovecot does not know this setting. As a quick fix, I could probably extend struct {?} protocol_versions[] (in iostream-openssl-common.c again) with an appropriate "TLSv1.3" entry (and send a patch), though I would also suggest to OpenSSL to add a SSL_TXT_TLSV1_3 define. Unfortunately, I have not found a config setting in dovecot to set SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_2, or in fact any way to enforce TLS &...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13433 Bug ID: 13433 Summary: out_of_memory in receive_sums on large files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

Dear Martin Pool. We regularly use rsync for making backups of our file systems but we have noticed that the atimes are not transferred with the files and are also always updated on the sender's side. Therefore, we have created a modified version of rsync based on rsync-2.6.6 protocol version 29 which transfers the access times with the transferred files and also allows to preserve the access

Hi folks, we would like your feedback on a new option we have implemented. We would like to know whether it should be merged into the CVS tree. Perhaps one of the rsync developers can have a look at the code, improve it where necessary, and committ it to CVS. The name of the option is "--delete-mdays=DAYS" and it works in conjunction with the option "--delete." It modifies

I posted a patch a few days ago that adds copying of atime. At that time, it was just enabled with -t/--times. After some time, we have figured out that that choice might not have been the best. Here's a new version of the patch (relative to CVS) that adds -A/--copy-atime instead. It also includes a test case. Any feedback on this patch and/or the previous one that I posted?

Here is a diff which should allow applying batch updates remotely ( as apposed to copying the batch files to the remote server and running rsync there ). Eg rsync --write-batch=test src dst1::dst rsync --read-batch=test dst2::dst Oli Dewdney diff -E -B -c -r rsync-2.5.6/flist.c rsync-2.5.6-remotebatch/flist.c *** rsync-2.5.6/flist.c Sat Jan 18 18:00:23 2003 ---

Here's a patch that makes rsync try to find an existing file in a group of hard-linked files so that it doesn't create the first one in the group from scratch if a later file could be used instead. Details: I decided to avoid having the code do an extra scan down the list when we encounter the lead file in the list. This is because it would be bad to have to do the same scan in the

hi everyone... somebody has experimented any problems with poor performance about ldap authentication against samba 4? I'm trying authentication with 300 users and many users can't login. Some conections are rejected. I doesn't found anything searching on internet. Any help? -- Grato, Jefferson Parreira dos Santos Emerick

In some filesystems, typically optimized for large I/O throughputs (like IBM GPFS, IBM SAN FS, or distributed filesystems in general) a lot of lseek() operations can strongly impact on performances. In this cases it can be helpful to enlarge the block size used to handle sparse files directly from a command line parameter. For example, using a sparse write size of 32KB, I've been able to