search for: protegidas

Hi Johannes, Sorry about the failing tests. I completely forgot about running all of them, I only ran the tests for the openmp ipo transforms. I found the GH issue in cache. I can post it here if you want. I analyzed these runtime calls, __tgt_target_teams_[nowait]. What I don't understand about the problem we want to solve (splitting the memory transfer into issue and wait and legally

Hi Johannes, Yes, I'm highly interested, I already started. It would be nice if you post the details again. I didn't take note of them, I was always looking at the issue in GH. The problem I'm facing right now is this: The first task is identifying OpenMP API calls referred to device memory allocation. I first understood how the compiler driver orchestrates the process of offloading

Ahhh I understand. So I believe the project you posted is still opened. Do you any advice on the question I posted before?. Thank you. On 22/03/20 1:26 p. m., Doerfert, Johannes wrote: > I did not. The issues sections on GH was removed. > > ________________________________________ > From: Hamilton Tobon Mosquera <htobonm at eafit.edu.co> > Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2020 12:21

Hi Johannes, I've been thinking on how to implement a solution for the problem and I have some questions: 1. You mention in the problem description that the current asynchronous functions can be used, and probably modified. The problem is that those runtime functions with _nowait at the end are not asynchronous. Looking at their implementations, they just wait for other tasks is there

Hi Johannes, In order to create the testcases with the FIXMEs showing how it should look after the transformation, I've been trying to come up with a way of splitting the runtime call __tgt_target_teams based on Silei's recent patch D77005. I like the idea of using its asynchronous version __tgt_target_teams_nowait, but I think we would have to modify it, either to return the

Hola compañeros de la lista, qué tal. Estoy haciendo un análisis de componentes principales utilizando las funciones "dudi.pca" (paquete "ade4") y "PCA" (paquete "FactoMineR"). Sucede que al comparar las coordenadas de cada individuo que obtiene cada función, las que corresponden al segundo componente principal tienen idéntica magnitud pero con

Hi there Johannes!, I was checking out the issue (about latency hiding when transferring memory from host to device) you posted about a week ago, but it's not there anymore. Did you remove it?. Thanks. Hamilton. On 21/03/20 10:04 p. m., Hamilton Tobon Mosquera via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi there!, > > Right now I'm starting with the project proposed by Johannes here: >

Instalo ade4 correctamente y no me abren los datos como por ejemplo data(bsetal97) ¿Qué piensan de eso? De: r-help-es-bounces en r-project.org [mailto:r-help-es-bounces en r-project.org] En nombre de Francesc Carmona Enviado el: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 7:30 AM Para: r-help-es en r-project.org Asunto: Re: [R-es] Análisis de componentes principales con ade4 y FactoMineR Por definición

Hi Hamilton, I personally don't believe the effort to make the IR "parallelism-aware" is worth it right now. What I propose is something else, see for example https://youtu.be/zfiHaPaoQPc and the OpenMPOpt pass. There are multiple bigger tasks towards better offloading, one of which is described here https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/180 It might be interesting to add the

Hola Jesús, Si no entiendo mal lo que planteas, has observado unas frecuencias N = c(12, 0, 8, 6, 4, 2) de pedidos acaecidos en 1:6 días, en total n = sum(N) pedidos. Llamemos P = (p1, p2, ?, p6) a las probabilidades ?teóricas? de pedido en cada día. En principio el vector N se puede considerar una realización de una distribución multinomial M(n; p1, ?, p6). P se puede estimar mediante las

Hi there!, As part of my application process to the next GSoC I'm working on the TODO in OpenMPOpt.cpp line 437:     // TODO: We should validate the declaration agains the types we expect.     Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/OpenMPOpt.cpp#L437 I have a question. When there is a mismatch in the types (return type or argument types) between

Dear R-users, I have tried, and I imagine it should be somewhere in the lines of passing extra arguments to the panel function, but does anyone know how to change the character expansion factor that is affecting an individual point in each of the panels of a lattice plot? I have tried to pass an overall cex argument containing the desired size for each point, but then the sizes are reused for the

Dear All, I've got into the habit of installing R from the precompiled Debian binaries, including many of the packages from the r-cran-* Debian packages, and later building from source (e.g., to link against Goto's BLAS, or to build patched versions, etc). I install the newly built R to the very same place (/usr/lib/R). This allows me to build and update R when I wish, AND provides the

Por definición la primera componente principal es una combinación lineal que maximiza la varianza de modo que si la componente 1 es el vector de coeficientes a, entonces, el vector -a también puede ser dicha componente. Las otras componentes, por ejemplo la segunda, es incorrelacionada con la primera y también maximiza la varianza, luego el signo no importa. Así pues, el signo de cada

Efectivamente. Puedes cambiar el signo de todos los valores de la segunda componente, por ejemplo al hacer un gráfico de dispersión. No creo que se pueda hacer directamente en la función. Saludos Francesc El 01/10/13 17:53, Argel Gastélum Arellánez ha escrit: > Hola Francesc, muchas gracias por tu respuesta. > > Entonces, si quisiera que las gráficas de los resultados de

...source destination DNAT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:www to:172.16.0.3:80 DNAT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:https to:172.16.0.3:443 Some solution?? Regards, David _________________________________________ Tec. David Gonzalez Romero Network/System Administrator CNAP- Centro Nacional ?reas Protegidas Linux counter: 242534 _________________________________________ _________________________________________ Tec. David Gonzalez Romero Network/System Administrator CNAP- Centro Nacional ?reas Protegidas Linux counter: 242534 _________________________________________

I have linux box (does nat and firewall for small network) connected to dsl. I want to set priorities for protocols (that nothing could disturb web browsing). This is my rules (eth0 connected to internet): /sbin/tc qdisc del dev eth0 root /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 30 r2q 100 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 900Kbit burst 15k /sbin/tc class

I am using the new 1.8.5 and I just found out that Asterisk won't record the call if the call just hangup. I did a test like this: exten => 1009, 1, Hangup() Then I called 1009: == Using UDPTL CoS mark 5 == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Executing [1009 at init-1005:1] Hangup("SIP/1007-0000003c", "") in new stack == Spawn extension (init-1005, 1009, 1)

Hi all, I've a problem using a user with administrator privileges for mounting or adding a machine to PDC. I created a common user called fernando #id fernando uid=1000(fernando) gid=544(Administrators) grupos=544(Administrators),512(Domain Admins) Mounting a resource with smbmount works fine, this the result from log.smbd check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [fernando] ->

I am planning to schedule a monthly XCP meeting for the community and am struggling with when to host the call. As we are a global community, there is no single optimal time to host the meeting. In an effort to support the most likely attendees, please send me your time zone if you plan to participate in these calls. I will track the most common time zones in an effort to maximize attendance. All