search for: protcols

I have done some experimenting but if am incorrect I would like someone to correct me. I am trying to run multiple streams so what I have created additional directories such as mrock24, mRock64, and mRock128 in the '/etc/ices' directory . In these directories I have placed new conf files and playlist files respectively streaming 24, 64, and 128. These directories are also the name of the

Can anyone remind me of the reason for breaking the rhosts-rsa protcol (by not using a privilaged port by default)? -- Mike Stone

hello, I'm also developing a ssh application in java and I also got stuck with DH-Key Exchange. I just get to the SSH_MSG_KEXDH_REPLY from the server. But what is he expecting me to send then, as far as I understand the Transport Layer Protcol I should send the SSH_MSG_NEWKEYS message, but that doesn't work. Does anyone know what to send then? (the hint from Markus Friedl with kexdh.c

I brought this up some time ago at comp.protcols.smb, which showed that others have run into the same problem, but so far I haven't found a solution anywhere. The problem is that since Y2K, I haven't been able to browse the auto homes share [homes] with Win NT4 (details below). Does anybody have any idea what the cause of this problem is...

Hi, yesterday I upgraded Dovecot from 1.2 to 2.0.11. I'd seen that there was a config file converter to make the upgrade smooth so was expecting it to be pretty quick and easy. In the end I spent a long time trying to get it working as it just wouldn't listen on the ssl ports, imaps and pop3s. I am using per portocol SSL certificates, as I was in version 1.2. The part of my

On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:13:53 +0100, Ralph Böhme via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 05:34:21PM +1100, Martin Schwenke via samba wrote: > > If you lock the file from a client attached to 1 node and > > "smbstatus -L" shows the lock from all the nodes then CTDB is doing > > what it is meant to. That is, it makes sure that Samba

Hi, I'n using the nautilus file browser in a GNOME desktop environment on a FC2 system. If I enter smb:/// in the location bar in nautilus I can see the network but whenever I try to look at the shares on a computer I get a message saying that I do not have permissions to view the contents. I looked in the archives and found a thread on a similar problem. This thread mentioned that

Hello, the man page is quite explicit about not fiddling with the oplock break wait time parameter unless one has understood the oplock code. Is there an explanation for this that doesn't require one to be fully read up on the SMB/CIFS protcols? :) What form of errors are we talking about? Race conditions? How dangerous is it? The thing is that we're having a lot of trouble related to the clients missing the break requests (the word/excel documents-take-time-to-open story). User's are getting seriously annoyed... so we have to do...

Hi Alex, On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:29:13 +0000, Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 02/11/16 07:29, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:56:06PM +0000, Alex Crow wrote: > [...] > >> Hi Ralph, > >> > >> Thanks for that. Can I post the above back to the ML with links to > >> appropriate logs? >

>AFAIK, this will work. However, if all you want to do is have the same >content at different bitrates, you can achieve this with one instance of >ices and one playlist. Not sure of the specifics though as I don't use >ices 0.2.3. I can look though. If you can just point me in the direction >Yes. You need the browser to download a file containing the IP address so >it

Ok sorry to NOT have an answer you are looking for but I don't want anyone wasting their time on what is clearly a microsoft issue. Outlook 365 / Outlook since 2010 simply does not support imap. You can tweek it here and there however here are the basic's Outlook IMAP does not support IDLE thus no auto upating of the inbox and other folder changes etc... Outlook (this if from

Hi List, I have some very strange problems with samba on my shiny new server. The first problem was that file transfers were very slow (copying a file of 700Mb took 50 minutes over 100Mbit network). I checked other protcols (ftp/http/scp) on the server and they were able to use the 100Mbit link for full. After a lot of debugging, I found that the problem was related to oplocks. When disabling oplocks, the same file was copied in just under 2 minutes. However a second problem occured. Although copying files of the sam...

Hi Martin, On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 05:34:21PM +1100, Martin Schwenke via samba wrote: > On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:29:13 +0000, Alex Crow via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 02/11/16 07:29, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:56:06PM +0000, Alex Crow wrote: > > [...] > > >> Hi Ralph, > > >>

Dear all, Hello, This is Junichi Takada from Japan. My PC environment is Linux of Devian sarge3.1 . And it installed apache2.0, Icecast2.0, and DarwinStreamingServer5.5 Icecast used port 8000, DSS used port 9000 and 554. Now, I attached mp3s link on my web site. And when other client PC clicked it's link address, mp3 as meta file remains in it's cache. About account, Web dir

Hi all, I have recently migrated my mail from courier-imap to dovecot. In doing so, I finally configured mutt to connect to imaps (SSL). In the end I got it all working. I then sat back and thought: "I kinda don't understand the SSL/TLS part even though it works". And I hate setting stuff up and not truely understanding the mechanics of it. So I started to write about it and am

X forwarding doesn't work for me under Linux kernels 2.4.0-test8 or test9, using OpenSSH 2.2.0p1 (as packaged in Debian woody.) When I try to ssh to my machine, the client spits out the following pieces of information: Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding. Last login: Tue Oct 3 15:26:19 2000 from localhost on pts/2 Linux mallard 2.4.0-test9 #3 Tue Oct 3 14:20:59 CDT 2000 i686 unknown

...d AIX, and probably occurs on others. # ssh localhost nc localhost 22 SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_3.4p1 [kill ssh from another window] # ps -eaf |grep nc dtucker 5919 1 0 21:05:08 ? 0:00 nc localhost 22 The following patch (against -cvs) sends a HUP to the child process(es) when sshd exits for protcols 1 and 2. It assumes that there's only one session for v1. (Is that valid?) It has been tested on Solaris 7 (including regression tests). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Thanks to J.P. I now have a better understanding of how scp really works. I haven't uncovered any dark secrets, or unintended capabilities, I just prevented scp from sending the proper commands via ssh to the remote server. In essence, I gave scp a lobotomy or short-circuit. Either way, it's useful and gives me the desired effect. I don't know if anyone else would find this

HI All, I have setup (and it was so easy) using SSH with keys instead of password authentication. I want to turn password authentication off completely. What I dont understand is how SFTP would work them. I dont see any settings in my FTP clients to use SFTP without providing a password. If that is the case, that is fine since the FTP users have no real privileges except to their own web

I'm using rsync version 2.5.7, and I see this behavior with Debian and Redhat installations. This works: rsync rsync://mirror.physics.ncsu.edu/redhat/linux/updates/9/en/os/i386/zebra* ./temp But this doesn't: rsync --write-batch=mytest rsync://mirror.physics.ncsu.edu/redhat/linux/updates/9/en/os/i386/zebra* ./temp I've also tried with my normal args, like "-vvvvv --progress -t