search for: prot_iter

...x 76f8d649147b..cbe0ea26c1ff 100644 > --- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c > +++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c > @@ -964,7 +964,8 @@ vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) > prot_bytes = vhost32_to_cpu(vq, v_req_pi.pi_bytesin); > } > /* > - * Set prot_iter to data_iter, and advance past any > + * Set prot_iter to data_iter and truncate it to > + * prot_bytes, and advance data_iter past any > * preceeding prot_bytes that may be present. > * > * Also fix up the exp_data_len to reflect only the > @@ -973,6 +974,7 @...

The following patches were made over Linus's tree and fix an issue where windows guests will send iovecs with offset/lengths that result in IOs that are not aligned to 512. The LIO layer will then send them to Linux's block layer but it requires 512 byte alignment, so depending on the block driver being used we will get IO errors or hung IO. The following patches have vhost-scsi detect

The following patches were made over Linus's tree and fix an issue where windows guests will send iovecs with offset/lengths that result in IOs that are not aligned to 512. The LIO layer will then send them to Linux's FS/block layer but it requires 512 byte alignment, so depending on the FS/block driver being used we will get IO errors or hung IO. The following patches have vhost-scsi

....carpenter at oracle.com> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c index 253310c..b98dac1 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) struct iov_iter out_iter, in_iter, prot_iter, data_iter; u64 tag; u32 exp_data_len, data_direction; - unsigned out, in; + unsigned int out = 0, in = 0; int head, ret, prot_bytes; size_t req_size, rsp_size = sizeof(struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp); size_t out_size, in_size;

....carpenter at oracle.com> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c index 253310c..b98dac1 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) struct iov_iter out_iter, in_iter, prot_iter, data_iter; u64 tag; u32 exp_data_len, data_direction; - unsigned out, in; + unsigned int out = 0, in = 0; int head, ret, prot_bytes; size_t req_size, rsp_size = sizeof(struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp); size_t out_size, in_size;

Hi: This series try to prvernt a guest triggerable CPU hogging through vhost kthread. This is done by introducing and checking the weight after each requrest. The patch has been tested with reproducer of vsock and virtio-net. Only compile test is done for vhost-scsi. Please review. This addresses CVE-2019-3900. Jason Wang (4): vhost: introduce vhost_exceeds_weight() vhost_net: fix possible

Hi: This series try to prevent a guest triggerable CPU hogging through vhost kthread. This is done by introducing and checking the weight after each requrest. The patch has been tested with reproducer of vsock and virtio-net. Only compile test is done for vhost-scsi. Please review. This addresses CVE-2019-3900. Changs from V1: - fix user-ater-free in vosck patch Jason Wang (4): vhost:

Hi: This series try to prevent a guest triggerable CPU hogging through vhost kthread. This is done by introducing and checking the weight after each requrest. The patch has been tested with reproducer of vsock and virtio-net. Only compile test is done for vhost-scsi. Please review. This addresses CVE-2019-3900. Changs from V1: - fix user-ater-free in vosck patch Jason Wang (4): vhost:

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with pmd implement by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor change was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a busy polling backend. Test were done between localhost and guest. Testpmd (rxonly) in guest reports 2.4Mpps. Testpmd (txonly) repots about 2.1Mpps. Notes: The event

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with pmd implement by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor change was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a busy polling backend. Test were done between localhost and guest. Testpmd (rxonly) in guest reports 2.4Mpps. Testpmd (txonly) repots about 2.1Mpps. Notes: The event

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V3 ahttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/25/34. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on PPS (event index is off). More testing is ongoing. Notes for tester: - Start from this version, vhost need qemu co-operation to work

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V3 ahttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/25/34. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on PPS (event index is off). More testing is ongoing. Notes for tester: - Start from this version, vhost need qemu co-operation to work

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring. Changes from V2: - do not use & in checking desc_event_flags - off should be most significant bit -

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring. Changes from V2: - do not use & in checking desc_event_flags - off should be most significant bit -

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V5 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/138. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on TX PPS when doing pktgen from guest to host. No ovbious improvement on RX PPS. We can do lots of optimizations on top but for simple

Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's guest driver series at https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/942297/ Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test

Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's guest driver series at https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/942297/ Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test

Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V6 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/5/120. Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test virtio-net pmd as well when

Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V6 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/5/120. Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test virtio-net pmd as well when