search for: proscribed

Hi, I've cross-posted this to freedesktop@, as the xdg@ list is only used for actual specification development. On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 00:36, Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, we were thinking of asking if freedesktop would host Kazan (https://github.com/kazan-3d/kazan) for us, however some of our community members have objections with how freedesktop's

Hey :) I need to simulate a login in my functional test, otherwise I can''t GET nor POST to the action. I need to set the session key "logged_in_user_id". I tried this inside the setup() method: session[''logged_in_user_id''] = 1 But that throws: TypeError: can''t convert String into Integer Any ideas? Thanks, Rob -------------- next part

...gt; cases, affect a person's ability to participate within them, when the conduct amounts to an egregious violation of the communitie's social standard." > > But it's not, in practice, any different. > > Basically, if you are looking for complete and total bright line proscribed standards, they pretty much don't exist anywhere except in criminal statutes :) > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016, 2:45 PM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > I expect Rafael's concern is because the code also says: > > > > In addition, vio...

...ese spaces may, in rare cases, affect a person's ability to participate within them, when the conduct amounts to an egregious violation of the communitie's social standard." But it's not, in practice, any different. Basically, if you are looking for complete and total bright line proscribed standards, they pretty much don't exist anywhere except in criminal statutes :) On Thu, Jun 30, 2016, 2:45 PM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > I expect Rafael's concern is because the code also says: > > > > In addition, violations of this code ou...

...nux box where i run asterisk it does not register. I tried even by specifying the host and port in sip.conf and using the same new settings for sjphone yet it can't register. domain and host are both 192.168.x.x...port 5061 for sjphone (tried using other ports too)....user name and secret as proscribed in sip.conf and the sip.conf has the host port settings as 192.168.x.x and 5061. Am i doing something wrong here or i should just forget the idea...i am trying to reroute calls so installing a softphone on one machine gives me a good testing platform without having to use another machine.(becau...

Hi, everyone, We've been reasonably happy with Polycom SoundPoint phones, but we only have them installed on the LAN. I've read that they have problems working across NAT. So ... I guess I have a few questions. First, is there a way to get Polycoms to work well over NAT? If not, then are there phones of comparable voice quality that do work well over NAT? Without costing a lot more?

I expect Rafael's concern is because the code also says: In addition, violations of this code outside these spaces may, in rare cases, affect a person's ability to participate within them. So it can apply outside spaces explicitly sponsored by LLVM, in undefined circumstances. --paulr From: cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Berlin via cfe-dev Sent:

The deb-oriented package providers (and others perhaps, it''s only debian I''m looking at right now) allow one to set a seedfile with the appropriate debconf responses when installing a package. However, there doesn''t seem to be a tidy way inherent to puppet to handle reconfiguring the package if the seedfile changes. It can be done quite easily with something like the

...>> > ambisonic signal, which can then be handled by the Vorbis Ambisonic >> > support. >> >> So U and V are the planar quadupole (m=+/-2) moments? I'm glad to hear >> you can get by with the same number of channels. > >They happen to fit nicely with the proscribed speaker placements for 5.1. >I haven't done testing to determine how well I'm really representing 5.1 >yet as doing so will require me setting up a proper 5.1 speaker system >which seems horribly boring compared to my 14 channel ambisonic rig. imple'nuff, Plug up you ears and...

We really have been trying to keep in mind that LLVM needs to support multiple front ends, which may be implementing different language standards. As much as possible, I’ve been trying to let the IEEE 754 spec drive my thinking about this, though I’ll admit that on a few points I’ve use the C99 spec as a sort of reference interpretation of IEEE 754. LLVM’s IRBuilder has been recently updated to

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Rafael Espíndola <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I am strongly opposed to it as it stands. > > Who decided this and with what authority? As written the code of > conduct tries restrict the acceptable opinions one may voice even in > channels not related to llvm at all. > > errr, it says: "This code of conduct applies to all

Let me clarify. These aren’t intended to be exposed to the user. The user code that leads to the generation of these intrinsics will be normal floating point operations combined with either pragmas (such as “STDC FENV_ACCESS ON”) or command line options (such as the recently introduced “-fp-model=strict”). The reason I’ve been avoiding normal constant values is that it provides no information when