search for: proriti

Suppose I have one agent login into two different queue and there are calls waiting in both queues. If the calls in one queue has higher call prority (set QUEUE_PRO to higher value) than the calls in other queue, will the agent get the higher prority call first or the QUEUE_PRO has no effect? We have an Asterisk server( 1.2.17 with CentOS) running as ACD. We are having problem using weight option

Hey! I am trying to configure the voice onference with MeetMe application for my internal users. I have my server and 4 clients on same LAN and following is my extensions.conf file: [globals] Ahsen=SIP/222 Tahami=SIP/444 Uzair=SIP/333 Wasif=SIP/555 [internal] exten => 1234,1,Macro(voicemail,${Ahsen}) exten => 4321,1,Macro(voicemail,${Uzair}) exten => 5678,1,Macro(voicemail,${Tahami})

Hi, I''m trying to figure out how to use Linux QoS. Default setting has three queues (bands) and should prioretise outgoing tarffic based on TOS field. I try to test that by flooding Ethernet interface by netperf or iptraf and running ping -f with -Q and without Q. -Q doesn''t affect ping results, it suffers anyway. It seems that I don''t understand something. I verified

Hello, I created this setup, DSL------LINUX ROUTER-------ASTERISK Linux acts as router and forwards packets only 512M and AMD 1599.987 MHz Asterisk 512M AMD 2000 MHz When I ssh to linux router during the call and execute any command that requires cpu , then sound gets choppy. Simple test would be establish a call and start "du /" on the router. The same applies to asterisk box.

I have wondershaper to limit my upload at 400kilobits (my line is 600kbps). I do a lot of torrent seeding and I dont want my pings killed when I''m uploading so I set low prority source ports as follows (by the way, I have bittornet to only use ports 6881-6910): NOPRIOPORTSRC="6881 6882 6883 6884 6885 6886 6887 6888 6889 6890 6891 6892 6893 6894 6895 6896 6897 6898 6899 6900 6901

Hi, I want to use inverted matches with tc-filter. I tried to invert the matches with a "!", but this doesn''t seem to be the correct syntax. The following rules don''t work: ---------------------------snip----------------------------------------- $TC filter $ACTION dev $DEV protocol ip parent 1:0 u32 match ip src ${NETWORK[$i]} !match ip dst 192.168.0.0/24 flowid

Hello all, I saw that the ipv6 support issue was brought up a couple of times but I could quite get a complete picture of its status. Would asterisk currentl work over IPv6? If yes which version does v6 support start from? Thanks Emil

Dear All, I have a problem with the Marco and the Realtime Extensions in my extensions.conf. The problem is that when I exit from my Marco, I should return to my calling context, which is default but the next step for it should be switch statement which will use realtime extension. Somehow I am getting the following error below with autofallthrough=yes : -- Executing

Dear All, Sorry to be posting again. I have solved my problem. The problem is that when exiting from the macro, the priority number is still in effect. For example, priority 1 is at the start before entering macro after the macro the priorty will be 2. Since there isn't any other dialplan command, the switch statement would be search for a priority 2 in the Realtime extensions table. One

>Hi everyone, and thanks for your help so far. > >I have been playing around with tc and htb for a couple of weeks now, and >while I am nowhere near understanding everything here, I am beginning to >know more about packets than I ever wanted to know. > >I have two university buildings with a 1mb connection to the Internet. The >two buildings (on either side of town) are

I am running Asterisk 1.8.10.1. I am trying to set up some routing in my dial plans and having some issues (the issue being that I don't quite understand all of the syntax and patterns that can be used: Examples: DID1 = 6140000000 DID2 = 6140000001 CNAME1 = 6149999999 CNAME2 = 6149999998 CNAME3 = 6149999997 context1 context2 context3 I have looked at several examples (patterns) and I

Hi all, I''ve not been able to find an explanation of the relationship between prio and rate as they apply to the HTB technique. Hopefully someone on here will be able to help me. As I understand things, when prio values are assigned to an HTB setup, classes with a given prio value will only be serviced when there are no packets waiting in classes with a lower prio value. Now, does