search for: proposed_field_names

...se and, as COVERART is going > away, I would not recommend its use. > > The official list of tag names is in the Vorbis > documentation, and consists of only 15 tags. > There are also several lists of suggestions for > other tag names here: > https://wiki.xiph.org/VorbisComment#Proposed_field_names > >> To change the code to use METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE is simple, since >> COVERART >> also wrote in Base64. The result continues being the same handling >> easiness >> of Vorbis Comments. >> >> But in the FLAC case the problem continues existing. When I...

I have been tidying up the VorbisComment page in the XiphWiki. The problem with it was that it was a mixture of proposals and discussion of those proposals. This made it difficult for implementers to see what to implement. The problem section is: http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/VorbisComment#New_ENCODER_field_name_proposal This is a mess, and all I could do was add attributions to the