Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "prophylaxie".
Did you mean:
prophylaxis
2015 Jul 29
0
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
On Jul 28, 2015, at 8:50 PM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote:
>
>>> Equating this to ?vaccination? is a huge stretch.
>>
>> Why?
>
> It's not just an imperfect
2015 Jul 29
2
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote:
>> Equating this to ?vaccination? is a huge stretch.
>
> Why?
It's not just an imperfect analogy it really doesn't work on closer scrutiny.
Malware itself is not a good analog to antigens. Vaccinations provide
2010 Oct 03
1
Encoding problem in Rd file
...<return> to continue without it.
! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char \u8:?F not set up for use with LaTeX.
See the inputenc package documentation for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...
l.581 ? F
aug??re, O., Tillard, E., Faug??re, B., 1992. \emph{Prophylaxie ch...
Your command was ignored.
Type I <command> <return> to replace it with another command,
or <return> to continue without it.
! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char \u8:?\end not set up for use with LaTeX.
See the inputenc package documentation for explanation.
Type...
2015 Jul 29
5
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote:
> Just because one particular method of prophylaxis fails to protect against all threats doesn?t mean we should stop using it, or increase its strength.
Actually it does.There is no more obvious head butting than with
strong passwords vs usability. Strong login passwords and usability
are diametrically opposed.
2015 Jul 30
0
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
On Wed, July 29, 2015 4:16 pm, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote:
>> Just because one particular method of prophylaxis fails to protect
>> against all threats doesn???t mean we should stop using it, or increase
>> its strength.
>
> Actually it does.There is no more obvious head butting than with
>
2015 Jul 29
0
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
On Jul 29, 2015, at 3:16 PM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote:
>> Just because one particular method of prophylaxis fails to protect against all threats doesn?t mean we should stop using it, or increase its strength.
>
> Actually it does.There is no more obvious head