Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "propgating".
Did you mean:
propagating
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] [PATCH] typo in br_stp.c: propgating -> propagating
...linux-2.5.orig/net/bridge/br_stp.c 2004-07-19 14:43:44.000000000 +0300
+++ linux-2.5/net/bridge/br_stp.c 2004-07-19 14:53:15.000000000 +0300
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@
int isroot = br_is_root_bridge(br);
pr_info("%s: topology change detected, %s\n", br->dev->name,
- isroot ? "propgating" : "sending tcn bpdu");
+ isroot ? "propagating" : "sending tcn bpdu");
if (isroot) {
br->topology_change = 1;
2018 Apr 10
1
[RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework
...instantly taking over the slave.
>> This doesn't allow udev/systemd to do its device rename of the slave
>> device. Netvsc uses a delayed work to workaround this.
>
> Interesting. Does this mean udev must act within a specific time window
> then?
Sighs, lots of hacks. Why propgating this from driver to a common
module. We really need a clean solution.
-Siwei
>
>> Secondly, the select queue needs to call queue selection in VF.
>> The bonding/teaming logic doesn't work well for UDP flows.
>> Commit b3bf5666a510 ("hv_netvsc: defer queue selection...
2002 Nov 26
0
[Bug 444] Wrong path to ssh in scp after re-configure
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444
mouring at eviladmin.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org 2002-11-27 03:09 -------
No, that is the wrong way of handling
2001 Jul 27
2
OpenSSH-RSAAuth-NFS
Here's a bunch of changes I've made to the current portable version of
OpenSSH.
The aim is that the rsa_authentication flag in sshd_config can be given the
values "without-nfs" This is really handy within a large organization where
incorrectly secured home directories can allow authorized_keys(2) to be
modified by someone other than the owner.
So now rsa_authentication can take
2018 Apr 10
7
[RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:59:50 -0700
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote:
> Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic
> bypass infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com>
> ---
Thanks for doing this. Your current version has couple show stopper
issues.
First, the slave device is
2018 Apr 10
7
[RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:59:50 -0700
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote:
> Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic
> bypass infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com>
> ---
Thanks for doing this. Your current version has couple show stopper
issues.
First, the slave device is