search for: propgated

Hi. I'm not subscribed, so please Cc: me. This trivial patch fixes a typo that irritates me every time I boot.. --- linux-2.5.orig/net/bridge/br_stp.c 2004-07-19 14:43:44.000000000 +0300 +++ linux-2.5/net/bridge/br_stp.c 2004-07-19 14:53:15.000000000 +0300 @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ int isroot = br_is_root_bridge(br); pr_info("%s: topology change detected, %s\n",

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:59:50 -0700 >> Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote: >> >> > Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic >> > bypass

...dling it. The issue goes back to detecting dependancy changes. This will be an issue for ssh-add, sftp, sftp-server, scp, ssh-agent, ssh- keygen, ssh-keysign, ssh-keyscan and ssh-rand-helper. And it is deeper than just 'path has not changed'. it is 'Any changes in config.h are not propgated'. In the past we have stated if you do a 'make clean' before rebuilding. At this point I'm still convinced that is the correct thing to do. Handling dependancies is a nightmare. However, I will take another look at it. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- Yo...

Here's a bunch of changes I've made to the current portable version of OpenSSH. The aim is that the rsa_authentication flag in sshd_config can be given the values "without-nfs" This is really handy within a large organization where incorrectly secured home directories can allow authorized_keys(2) to be modified by someone other than the owner. So now rsa_authentication can take

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:59:50 -0700 Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote: > Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic > bypass infrastructure. > > Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> > --- Thanks for doing this. Your current version has couple show stopper issues. First, the slave device is

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:59:50 -0700 Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote: > Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic > bypass infrastructure. > > Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> > --- Thanks for doing this. Your current version has couple show stopper issues. First, the slave device is