Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "propgate".
Did you mean:
propagate
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] [PATCH] typo in br_stp.c: propgating -> propagating
Hi. I'm not subscribed, so please Cc: me.
This trivial patch fixes a typo that irritates me every time I boot..
--- linux-2.5.orig/net/bridge/br_stp.c 2004-07-19 14:43:44.000000000 +0300
+++ linux-2.5/net/bridge/br_stp.c 2004-07-19 14:53:15.000000000 +0300
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@
int isroot = br_is_root_bridge(br);
pr_info("%s: topology change detected, %s\n",
2018 Apr 10
1
[RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:59:50 -0700
>> Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic
>> > bypass
2002 Nov 26
0
[Bug 444] Wrong path to ssh in scp after re-configure
...dling it. The issue goes back to detecting
dependancy changes.
This will be an issue for ssh-add, sftp, sftp-server, scp, ssh-agent, ssh-
keygen, ssh-keysign, ssh-keyscan and ssh-rand-helper.
And it is deeper than just 'path has not changed'. it is 'Any changes in
config.h are not propgated'. In the past we have stated if you do a 'make
clean' before rebuilding.
At this point I'm still convinced that is the correct thing to do. Handling
dependancies is a nightmare. However, I will take another look at it.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
Y...
2001 Jul 27
2
OpenSSH-RSAAuth-NFS
Here's a bunch of changes I've made to the current portable version of
OpenSSH.
The aim is that the rsa_authentication flag in sshd_config can be given the
values "without-nfs" This is really handy within a large organization where
incorrectly secured home directories can allow authorized_keys(2) to be
modified by someone other than the owner.
So now rsa_authentication can take
2018 Apr 10
7
[RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:59:50 -0700
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote:
> Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic
> bypass infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com>
> ---
Thanks for doing this. Your current version has couple show stopper
issues.
First, the slave device is
2018 Apr 10
7
[RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:59:50 -0700
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote:
> Use the registration/notification framework supported by the generic
> bypass infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com>
> ---
Thanks for doing this. Your current version has couple show stopper
issues.
First, the slave device is