search for: propack

I am trying to install R onto an Altix system running SuSE Enterprise Linux 9 SP3 with SGI ProPack 4 SP3. I end up with this error no matter what I try. Any suggestions on how to proceed would be appreciated! ----- gcc -shared -L/opt/local/lib -o methods.so do_substitute_direct.o init.o methods_list_dispatch.o slot.o class_support.o tests.o ../../../../library/methods/libs/methods.so is unch...

...: >> (1) removing sub-version numbers is wrong; and ... That is a matter of opinion. In my opinion, assigning sub-version numbers to what was originally intended to be, by Red Hat, quarterly updates (almost Service Packs, if you will, much like SGI's numbering of their Foundation and ProPack products for the Altix server line) is what is illogical. Of course, the updates aren't quarterly any more, and other aspects of the versioning have morphed and changed over the years since the RHAS days (well, even back in certain branches of RHL 6.2, for that matter). So you could read...

...it is not an improvement, then there is no reason for the change, is there ? > In my opinion, assigning sub-version numbers to what was originally > intended to be, by Red Hat, quarterly updates (almost Service Packs, > if you will, much like SGI's numbering of their Foundation and ProPack > products for the Altix server line) is what is illogical. Of course, > the updates aren't quarterly any more, and other aspects of the > versioning have morphed and changed over the years since the RHAS days > (well, even back in certain branches of RHL 6.2, for that matter)....

There are 3 issues here: Grub, the kernel and RedHat. 1) Grub won't run in an XFS /boot partition, but will happily run xfs_state1_5 to boot from an XFS root partition. 2) The kernel has supported XFS quite happily since at least 2005, I am looking at an SGI Propack 4 manual of February that year and it states that SLES 9 SP 1 contains the kernels with XFS support. 3) May be an issue. I'm just closing down an old Altix (2004 vintage) and that has always run XFS for everything except /boot. In the early days it used RedHat, but SGI's software included...

...;> On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 00:51 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: >> >> In my opinion, assigning sub-version numbers to what was originally >> intended to be, by Red Hat, quarterly updates (almost Service Packs, >> if you will, much like SGI's numbering of their Foundation and ProPack >> products for the Altix server line) is what is illogical. Of course, >> the updates aren't quarterly any more, and other aspects of the >> versioning have morphed and changed over the years since the RHAS days >> (well, even back in certain branches of RHL 6.2, for t...

...ng sub-version numbers is wrong; and ... > > That is a matter of opinion. In my opinion, assigning sub-version numbers to > what was originally intended to be, by Red Hat, quarterly updates (almost > Service Packs, if you will, much like SGI's numbering of their Foundation and > ProPack products for the Altix server line) is what is illogical. Of course, > the updates aren't quarterly any more, and other aspects of the versioning > have morphed and changed over the years since the RHAS days (well, even back > in certain branches of RHL 6.2, for that matter). > &gt...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We would like to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7 (1503) for 64 bit x86 compatible machines. This is the second major release for CentOS-7 and is tagged as 1503. This build is derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.1 As always, read through the Release Notes at : http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 - these notes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We would like to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7 (1503) for 64 bit x86 compatible machines. This is the second major release for CentOS-7 and is tagged as 1503. This build is derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.1 As always, read through the Release Notes at : http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 - these notes