search for: pronounced

Does anyone have any idea on how to force cepstral to convert a number to speech ? I have noticed that sometimes it speaks the number correctly, and at others it doesn't. 1) 787 is pronounced 7-8-7 2) 123 is pronounced one-hundred and twenty-three. 1) is wrong for what i need, 2) is perfect. Is there anyway of forcing numbers to be pronounced as 2) ? I've tried looking at the ssml tags .. TIA Julian

As far as I know, btrfs comes from "btree file system", but why does btrfs pronounce "butter-eff-ess"? -- Wang Shaoyan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Greets, Every linux user that sets up a sound card using sndconfig heres Linus pronouncing "Linux" - I confess that's how I learned to pronounce it right, until then I prononced it 'l-EYE-nucks' - I was wondering - what's the correct pronounciation of 'Ogg Vorbis'? I pronounce it 'OOOg' (a long 'O' sound or a portuguese 'U' if you must

Maybe this is a faq. but how? I pronounce it as "ZEN". in Japanese, it is same pronounce as "zen", a kind of Taoism. --- Okajima. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from

Hello, LLVMers. I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? Thanks, Seung

Anyone know how centos is actually pronounced? When people I work with ask me which linux I run, I say it like the word scent - oh - s, with a sharp S on the end. How's everyone else say it? How's it supposed to be said?

Is CentOS pronounced as a word, or as cent-oh-es? Miark

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2446 Bug ID: 2446 Summary: Provide an option to show SHA256 fingerprints in a more pronouncable format Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.0p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

On Thu, April 16, 2015 8:59 pm, Peter Lawler wrote: > [OT ALERT] > > On 17/04/15 02:28, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> clamav is a scanner that is designed to detect viruses (virii I should >> use >> for plural as it is Latin word) > I believe this 'rule' in English is misunderstood by many and as a > general rule of thumb... > tl;dr: > Words from Old

...keeping it off, even without irq >> affinity. >> >> The cycle cost is significant without affinity regardless of whether the >> optimization is used. > > > Yes, I noticed this in the past too. > >> Though this is not limited to napi-tx, it is more >> pronounced in that mode than without napi. >> >> 1x TCP_RR for affinity configuration {process, rx_irq, tx_irq}: >> >> upstream: >> >> 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc >> 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc >> >> napi tx: >> >> 1,1,1: 34492 Mbps, 269 Gcyc &...

...keeping it off, even without irq >> affinity. >> >> The cycle cost is significant without affinity regardless of whether the >> optimization is used. > > > Yes, I noticed this in the past too. > >> Though this is not limited to napi-tx, it is more >> pronounced in that mode than without napi. >> >> 1x TCP_RR for affinity configuration {process, rx_irq, tx_irq}: >> >> upstream: >> >> 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc >> 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc >> >> napi tx: >> >> 1,1,1: 34492 Mbps, 269 Gcyc &...

...rr on the side of caution for the initial merge of napi tx. And enabling the optimization is always a win over keeping it off, even without irq affinity. The cycle cost is significant without affinity regardless of whether the optimization is used. Though this is not limited to napi-tx, it is more pronounced in that mode than without napi. 1x TCP_RR for affinity configuration {process, rx_irq, tx_irq}: upstream: 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc napi tx: 1,1,1: 34492 Mbps, 269 Gcyc 1,0,2: 36527 Mbps, 537 Gcyc (!) 1,0,1: 36269 Mbps, 394 Gcyc 1,0,0: 34674 Mbps, 402 Gcyc This i...

...rr on the side of caution for the initial merge of napi tx. And enabling the optimization is always a win over keeping it off, even without irq affinity. The cycle cost is significant without affinity regardless of whether the optimization is used. Though this is not limited to napi-tx, it is more pronounced in that mode than without napi. 1x TCP_RR for affinity configuration {process, rx_irq, tx_irq}: upstream: 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc napi tx: 1,1,1: 34492 Mbps, 269 Gcyc 1,0,2: 36527 Mbps, 537 Gcyc (!) 1,0,1: 36269 Mbps, 394 Gcyc 1,0,0: 34674 Mbps, 402 Gcyc This i...

Dear R list, I have a sequence of weekly observations of number of adults and larvae in various size classes from a butterfly population living in a subtropical area with pronounced wet and dry seasons. Wet and dry seasons are each defined 26 weeks long with fixed start and end dates. The data span 103 weeks (two seasons each of wet and dry) with some missing weeks. What I would like to do is compare means of each type of observation between wet and dry seasons ("Does t...

...nth (first, second, ..., thirty-first) ; Y Year ; I or l Hour, 12 hour clock ; H Hour, 24 hour clock (single digit hours preceded by "oh") ; k Hour, 24 hour clock (single digit hours NOT preceded by "oh") ; M Minute, with 00 pronounced as "o'clock" ; N Minute, with 00 pronounced as "hundred" (US military time) ; P or p AM or PM ; Q "today", "yesterday" or ABdY ; (*note: not standard strftime value) ; q "" (for today), &q...

On Jul 3, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Seung Jae Lee wrote: > Hello, LLVMers. > > I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. > > [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? We've been pronouncing it kl -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: abreve.gif Type: image/gif Size: 62 bytes Desc: not available URL:

On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Seung Jae Lee wrote: > I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. > > [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? I pronounce it just like the english word, which is probably one of your later two options :) -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

On Fri, April 17, 2015 12:50 am, Peter Lawler wrote: > On 17/04/15 12:31, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> But being not native >> English speaker, I use it ("not native English speaker") > Figured as much, which is why I mentioned it ;) > >> as an excuse for >> being unable to pronounce anything. > Not as if most English speakers can pronounce many English

...gt;> The cycle cost is significant without affinity regardless of whether the >> >> optimization is used. >> > >> > >> > Yes, I noticed this in the past too. >> > >> >> Though this is not limited to napi-tx, it is more >> >> pronounced in that mode than without napi. >> >> >> >> 1x TCP_RR for affinity configuration {process, rx_irq, tx_irq}: >> >> >> >> upstream: >> >> >> >> 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc >> >> 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc >> &g...

...gt;> The cycle cost is significant without affinity regardless of whether the >> >> optimization is used. >> > >> > >> > Yes, I noticed this in the past too. >> > >> >> Though this is not limited to napi-tx, it is more >> >> pronounced in that mode than without napi. >> >> >> >> 1x TCP_RR for affinity configuration {process, rx_irq, tx_irq}: >> >> >> >> upstream: >> >> >> >> 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc >> >> 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc >> &g...