search for: prolang

...expected failures 34 Regressions Single Source: None New Failures Single Source (new tests): 2005-05-12-Int64ToFP: llc,jit Regressions MultiSource: Applications/d/make_dparser: llc, cbe, jit Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: llc, cbe, jit Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs: llc, cbe Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl: llc, cbe, jit Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football: cbe Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: llc, cbe, jit Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep: llc Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/fixoutput/fixoutput: llc, cbe Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: llc, cbe, jit (looks like ld hung) Benchmarks/med...

Tanya Lattner wrote: > >> 1. I'm still looking for volunteers to test MacOS X and Solaris. >> If you'd like to volunteer, please email the list to let us know. > > > I'll do minimal testing on Sparc. I'm not going to look into any > regressions though since no one has been really watching Sparc since I > graduated and I am sure there are

...MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-pc1/enc-pc1 | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-3des/enc-3des | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2 | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/primes/primes | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/office/office...

...ications/JM/lencod/lencod TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod * Not sure, difference in numerical output TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi * Note sure. TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie * Note sure, CBE failed to link: /tmp/cc5Bwjx8.o: In function `keepWaitingDirsend': archie.cbe.c:(.text+0x715): undefined reference to `ltmp_1856_85' archie.cbe.c:(.text+0x735): undefined reference to `ltmp_1857_86' /tmp/cc5Bwjx8.o: In function...

...MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1 TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/...

....first && "Unknown constant value!"), function processFunction, file /usr/home/llvm/obj/../lib/Transforms/IPO/IPConstantPropagation.cpp, line 117. =========================================== /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/scan_line.c:10:20: malloc.h: No such file or directory /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/sym_tab.c:10:20: malloc.h: No such file or directory /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/M...

LLVMers, The LLVM 1.9 Prerelease is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.9/ If anyone can spare some time, please download the appropriate tarballs for your platform and test the release (at least with make check). I'd also appreciate any documentation reviews. Please note that llvm-gcc3 on x86 may not have a clean dejagnu run. You should see one XPASS for

...---------- ---------------- Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt 1.4634 0.684 -53.259532595326 Benchmarks/MiBench/security-sha/security-sh 0.0199 0.0128 -35.678391959799 Benchmarks/mediabench/adpcm/rawcaudio/rawca 0.0034 0.0025 -26.470588235294 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep 0.0032 0.0025 -21.875 Benchmarks/mediabench/jpeg/jpeg-6a/cjpeg 0.0032 0.0025 -21.875 Benchmarks/Olden/perimeter/perimeter 0.1747 0.1422 -18.603319977103 Benchmarks/mediabench/adpcm/rawdaudio/rawda 0.0022 0.0...

....37 1.09 * 1.25 | 0.93 1.17 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/OptimizerEval/optimizer-eval | 0.1680 38200 0.2200 * 0.1600 | 103.74 103.71 100.88 * 114.34 | 1.00 1.03 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/NP/np | 0.0040 1176 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city | 0.1400 24720 0.1120 *...

....15 0.75 * 0.93 | 0.73 1.12 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/OptimizerEval/optimizer-eval | 0.1862 38784 0.2298 * 0.2440 | 87.94 90.57 98.20 * 97.25 | 0.97 0.90 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/NP/np | 0.0034 1176 0.0036 * 0.0033 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city | 0.2161 29744 0.0947 *...

..., but I'm not sure if anybody has time to look into it. If nobody has time, we'll probably ship it as is. I've tried out a few programs: hexxagon is an XFAIL (Solaris doesn't have stdint.h), and make_dparser is genuinely broken (even with Chris's llvm-gcc fix). Some of the Prolangs-C tests are working now, probably due to Chris's fix, so Sparc is probaby in better shape than it looks. If you want to try out the new CFE, just re-download it using the same directions I gave before. The new one is built and ready to go. -- John T. > > Sparc testing results: &gt...

Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

....11 0.90 * 1.04 | 0.95 1.17 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/OptimizerEval/optimizer-eval | 0.1705 38196 0.1914 * 0.2069 | 78.02 76.34 87.37 * 87.81 | 1.02 0.89 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/NP/np | 0.0105 1188 0.0027 * 0.0026 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city | 0.1436 24648 0.0832 *...

....46 0.45 * 0.53 | 0.93 0.96 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/OptimizerEval/optimizer-eval | 0.1062 40584 0.1009 * 0.1070 | 74.02 90.27 87.70 * 86.42 | 0.82 0.84 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/NP/np | 0.0018 1196 0.0017 * 0.0017 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city | 0.1095 31020 0.0482 *...

...30 *          96.14 | 0.97    0.98    n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p                                       | > 0.9300 198188   1.0400      *                *           |    0.00 * >  0.01 *        *       | n/a     -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/NP/np                                | > 0.0000 1188     0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city                            | > 0.1199 23708    0.0800    ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...ightly test suite tests that produce a __text segment larger than 8K and a code size difference larger than 1%. Negative numbers means smaller code, positive larger. Targeting i386 PIC -O2: -7.3% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/Output/security-rijndael -7.2% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/simulator/Output/simulator -5.3% MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/Output/hexxagon -5.2% MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/Output/SIBsim4 -4.8% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/Output/cfrac -4.1% MultiSource/Applications/d/Output/make_dparser -4.0% MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/Outpu...

...uot;Unknown constant value!"), function processFunction, file /usr/home/llvm/obj/../lib/Transforms/IPO/IPConstantPropagation.cpp, line 117. > > =========================================== > > /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/scan_line.c:10:20: malloc.h: No such file or directory > /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/assembler/sym_tab.c:10:20: malloc.h: No such file or directory > > /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../proje...

...| 0.97 0.98 n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/ > paq8p | 0.9300 198188 > 1.0400 * * | 0.00 * 0.01 > * * | n/a - n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/NP/ > np | 0.0000 1188 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/ > city | 0.1199 23708...