search for: projsrcroot

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "projsrcroot".

Did you mean: proj_src_root
2013 Aug 22
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC PATCH] X32 ABI support for Clang/compiler-rt (compiler-rt patch)
...GS) -m64 $(SANITIZER_CFLAGS) +CFLAGS.lsan-x32 := $(CFLAGS) -mx32 $(SANITIZER_CFLAGS) SHARED_LIBRARY.asan-arm-android := 1 ANDROID_COMMON_FLAGS := -target arm-linux-androideabi \ @@ -120,30 +158,45 @@ # enough support to build the sanitizers or profile runtimes. CFLAGS.full-i386 += --sysroot=$(ProjSrcRoot)/SDKs/linux CFLAGS.full-x86_64 += --sysroot=$(ProjSrcRoot)/SDKs/linux +CFLAGS.full-x32 += --sysroot=$(ProjSrcRoot)/SDKs/linux FUNCTIONS.full-i386 := $(CommonFunctions) $(ArchFunctions.i386) FUNCTIONS.full-x86_64 := $(CommonFunctions) $(ArchFunctions.x86_64) +FUNCTIONS.full-x32 := $(CommonFunct...
2014 May 28
3
[LLVMdev] Compiler-RT on Buildbots
Folks, I realised there's a "checkout_compiler_rt" option on ClangBuilder, which does checkout the sources, but couldn't build them on ARM. I also don't build them during releases (yet) because the configure script doesn't prepare the Makefiles for compiler-rt. A while ago I got it running on ARM with CMake files, but since these are buildbots, I'm not sure
2013 Aug 22
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC PATCH] X32 ABI support for Clang/compiler-rt (compiler-rt patch)
...+CFLAGS.lsan-x32 := $(CFLAGS) -mx32 $(SANITIZER_CFLAGS) > > SHARED_LIBRARY.asan-arm-android := 1 > ANDROID_COMMON_FLAGS := -target arm-linux-androideabi \ > @@ -120,30 +158,45 @@ > # enough support to build the sanitizers or profile runtimes. > CFLAGS.full-i386 += --sysroot=$(ProjSrcRoot)/SDKs/linux > CFLAGS.full-x86_64 += --sysroot=$(ProjSrcRoot)/SDKs/linux > +CFLAGS.full-x32 += --sysroot=$(ProjSrcRoot)/SDKs/linux > > FUNCTIONS.full-i386 := $(CommonFunctions) $(ArchFunctions.i386) > FUNCTIONS.full-x86_64 := $(CommonFunctions) $(ArchFunctions.x86_64) > +FUNCTIO...
2012 Jul 14
2
[LLVMdev] Recompiling llvm+clang how-to?
...$SD/Makefile ); then \? /home/hum/Projects/clang_llvm/llvm/autoconf/mkinstalldirs $DD; \? /bin/cp $SD/Makefile $DD/Makefile; \?fi; \?make -C $DD all hum 3247 0.0 0.0 4388 608 pts/2 S+ 00:45 0:00 /bin/sh -c make -C /home/hum/Projects/clang_llvm/llvm/projects/compiler-rt \? ProjSrcRoot=/home/hum/Projects/clang_llvm/llvm/projects/compiler-rt \? ProjObjRoot=/home/hum/Projects/clang_llvm/build/tools/clang/runtime/compiler-rt \? CC="/home/hum/Projects/clang_llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/bin/clang" \? clang_linux hum 3248 0.0 0.0 15908 1356 pts/2 S+ 00:45 0:0...
2012 Jul 13
0
[LLVMdev] Recompiling llvm+clang how-to?
Hi Journeyer J. Joh, > I have questions about compiling Clang+llvm. > > I compile as the link below instructs. > > http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html > > I do on Ubuntu 12.04. > > `time make -j5` prints for about 13 minutes to compile a brand new > version of Clang+llvm. > And after this I edit some C++ code(clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp) and > compiles
2012 Jul 13
2
[LLVMdev] Recompiling llvm+clang how-to?
Hello list I have questions about compiling Clang+llvm. I compile as the link below instructs. http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html I do on Ubuntu 12.04. `time make -j5` prints for about 13 minutes to compile a brand new version of Clang+llvm. And after this I edit some C++ code(clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp) and compiles using the very same makefile which was used above sentence. But this
2013 Aug 22
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC PATCH] X32 ABI support for Clang/compiler-rt (Clang patch)
Clang patch for X32 support. Applies against current trunk. --- ./tools/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td.orig 2013-05-16 21:51:51.286129820 +0000 +++ ./tools/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td 2013-05-16 21:53:24.875004239 +0000 @@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ HelpText<"Enable hexagon-qdsp6 backward compatibility">; def m3dnowa : Flag<["-"], "m3dnowa">,
2013 Aug 22
7
[LLVMdev] [RFC PATCH] X32 ABI support for Clang/compiler-rt
Hi, I'm working on bringing up complete coverage for a Gentoo x32 "desktop" system. I've been cooking up quite a few patches for various packages to push upstream, but right now, the biggest blocker is the lack of support for building with/codegen targeting x32 in llvm/clang. Since the x32 patches were sent last year, I see support code has landed in LLVM, and basic handling of