Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "proj_".
Did you mean:
proj
2005 Feb 14
1
[LLVMdev] Fix using old BUILD_OBJ_ROOT/BUILD_SRC_ROOT in 2 LLVM makefiles [PATCH]
I found use old BUILD_OBJ_ROOT/BUILD_SRC_ROOT in comment in
llvm/Makefile.common
and in llvm/projects/Stacker/test/Makefile code.
I update it to PROJ_* in attached patches.
Vladimir
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Makefile.common.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1081 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20050214/a838982e/attachment....
2015 Jun 19
3
[LLVMdev] Long-Term Support for LLVM Projects Extension to Build System?
...maintained. For example, SAFECode
doesn't have its own build system; it uses LLVM's, and it does so
without being a "patch" to the LLVM source tree. You can put the
SAFECode source code anywhere you like, use LLVM-style Makefiles in its
source code, and build it. All of the PROJ_SRC_ROOT, PROJ_OBJ_ROOT
magic in the autoconf build system is what permits that feature to work.
Do you intend to keep this functionality when you replace autoconf with
cmake, or will all projects that want to use the LLVM build system need
to place their source code in the LLVM source tree? To...
2005 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
The proposed makefile changes have been committed. If you are working
from CVS head and you use the LLVM Makefile System in your own project,
please make a note of the following:
1. If your makefiles use any BUILD_* variables, they now need to be
prefixed with PROJ_ instead of BUILD_. For example,
BUILD_SRC_ROOT is now PROJ_SRC_ROOT.
2. There are additional requirements for projects. Please review
this file:
http://illuvium.net/src/projects/sample/Makefile.common.in
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 09:55, Reid Spencer wrote:
> Hi,
>
&...
2005 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
The proposed makefile changes have been committed. If you are working
from CVS head and you use the LLVM Makefile System in your own project,
please make a note of the following:
1. If your makefiles use any BUILD_* variables, they now need to be
prefixed with PROJ_ instead of BUILD_. For example,
BUILD_SRC_ROOT is now PROJ_SRC_ROOT.
2. There are additional requirements for projects. Please review
this file:
http://illuvium.net/src/projects/sample/Makefile.common.in
as it contains the complete list of variables you need to set and
pro...
2005 Jan 16
1
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...e:
> The proposed makefile changes have been committed. If you are working
> from CVS head and you use the LLVM Makefile System in your own project,
> please make a note of the following:
>
> 1. If your makefiles use any BUILD_* variables, they now need to be
> prefixed with PROJ_ instead of BUILD_. For example,
> BUILD_SRC_ROOT is now PROJ_SRC_ROOT.
>
> 2. There are additional requirements for projects. Please review
> this file:
> http://illuvium.net/src/projects/sample/Makefile.common.in
> as it contains the complete list of variable...
2005 Jan 14
6
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...to use them. I propose removing them or
using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for
llvm
2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been
a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others.
They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate
they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's
3. The LLVM makefiles require a Makefile.config in the project. I'm
going to try to make that optional because some projects can
just use LLVM's Makefile.config....
2015 Jun 19
4
[LLVMdev] Long-Term Support for LLVM Projects Extension to Build System?
...or example,
> SAFECode doesn't have its own build system; it uses LLVM's, and it
> does so without being a "patch" to the LLVM source tree. You can put
> the SAFECode source code anywhere you like, use LLVM-style Makefiles
> in its source code, and build it. All of the PROJ_SRC_ROOT,
> PROJ_OBJ_ROOT magic in the autoconf build system is what permits
> that feature to work.
>
> Do you intend to keep this functionality when you replace autoconf
> with cmake, or will all projects that want to use the LLVM build
> system need to place their source code i...
2012 Jun 10
0
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build
...problem. Build was unable to locate
llvm-build because it was looking for it in
path/to/vmkit_src/utils/llvm-build while it was located in
path/to/llvm_src/utils/llvm-build
Actually llvm-build's path is defined by the
path/to/llvm_src/Makefile.rules and looks like this
LLVMBuildTool := $(PROJ_SRC_ROOT)/utils/llvm-build/llvm-build
however in the case of vmkit it should be
LLVMBuildTool := $(LLVM_SRC_ROOT)/utils/llvm-build/llvm-build
i Also noticed that in the vmkit's generated (by configure)
Makefile.config there are defined PROJ_SRC_ROOT and VMKIT_SRC_ROOT as
well as PROJ_OBJ_RO...
2015 Jun 18
2
[LLVMdev] Long-Term Support for LLVM Projects Extension to Build System?
Dear All,
Will the LLVM project system (the extension to the build system that
allows sub-projects to reuse the LLVM Makefiles) be maintained long
term, or is the slow push to CMake intending to deprecate this
functionality?
We used this feature a lot for research projects at UIUC, but if the
current maintainers of the build system are planning on deprecating it,
I'll have my students
2012 Jun 07
4
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build
Hi Nicolas,
it looks like there are missing things
$ more lib/j3/LLVMRuntime/LLVMRuntime.inc
// Generated by llvm2cpp - DO NOT MODIFY!
Module* makeLLVMModuleContents(Module *mod) {
mod->setModuleIdentifier("<stdin>");
// Type Definitions
// Function Declarations
// Global Variable Declarations
// Constant Definitions
// Global Variable Definitions
// Function
2012 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build
Thanks Favios for finding the problem! I have applied a patch to
Makefile.rules, hopefully it now works without you editing some files.
About VMKIT_SRC_ROOT and PROJ_SRC_ROOT, it is fine to have both in the
code. I find it clearer to use VMKIT_SRC_ROOT.
Nicolas
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Foivos S. Zakkak <foivos at zakkak.net>wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> I finally found the root of the problem. Build was unable to locate
> llvm-build beca...