search for: proj2

...log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY wins support = yes # Networking configuration Options Hosts Allow = *.*.*.* [Proj1] comment = Proj1 directory path = /engr/proj1 read only = No valid users = @tec,pvasireddy,pbuenros,dan,dsteffen,scollins [Proj2] comment = Proj2 directory path = /engr/proj2 read only = No valid users = @tec,pvasireddy,pbuenros,dan,dsteffen,scollins

...eate method to properly populate joins with new records :http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/67478#new. Check out his test: def test_create_by_new_record devel = Developer.new(:name => "Marcel", :salary => 75000) proj1 = devel.projects.create(:name => "Make bed") proj2 = devel.projects.create(:name => "Lie in it") assert_equal devel.projects.last, proj2 assert proj2.new_record? devel.save assert !devel.new_record? assert !proj2.new_record? assert_equal devel.projects.last, proj2 assert_equal Developer.find_by_name("Marcel&qu...

...and make you unpopular). The current 600+ colors in R are a luxury now. I remember before I learned about attaching to the search list (I don't know if it was because attaching was not mature yet, or I just had not learned it) we would name our objects using a pattern like: proj1.x, proj1.y, proj2.x, proj2.y, ... where proj1 and proj2 were identifiers for the projects (what I would name a data frame now) then there was a prefix function that you could set proj1 as a prefix and just type x and it would use proj1.x. Attaching was a huge jump forward, and the 'with' command is pure lux...

Hello. Thank you very much for the research paper. I will try to make use of the algorithms it presents. I just want to add that I found a 3rd party project doing dataflow analysis for LLVM IR at https://github.com/rohitjha/cse231-proj2. As written at http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~r1jha/#five , the project's description is: "Dataflow Analysis Framework for LLVM This is an extensible dataflow analysis framework for analyzing and optimizing LLVM IR code. The framework runs forward optimistic iterative dataflow analyses suc...

...path = /export/tmp read only = No [opt] comment = Witham Office Enterprise Applications path = /opt read only = No [gmp] comment = Witham Global Templates path = /opt/gmp read only = No [localopt] comment = Witham Local Specific Applications path = /local/opt read only = No [proj2] comment = Witham Project Area 2 path = /export/project2 read only = No [proj3] comment = Witham Project Area 3 path = /export/project3 read only = No [proj4] comment = Witham Project Area 4 path = /export/project4 read only = No [proj5] comment = Witham Project Area 5 path = /export/...

You can use: http://www.rw.cdl.uni-saarland.de/~grund/papers/cgo08-liveness.pdf -----Original Message----- From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Alex Susu via llvm-dev Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 9:39 PM To: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [llvm-dev] Live interval analysis on LLVM IR (not on Machine instructions) Hello. Could you

Hello. Could you please tell me how can I implement best a live interval analysis on LLVM IR (not on Machine instructions, which is already available in http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/LiveIntervalAnalysis_8cpp_source.html)? I need to analyze the standard LLVM IR (list of Instruction *) and decide for each SSA variable what is it's live(ness) interval. My problem is that I