search for: programs_to_test

...the output of a file compile with normal llc with a file compiled with llc -tailcallopt. So my SingleSource/TailCall/Makefile looks like the following: ---- LEVEL = ../.. include $(LEVEL)/Makefile.config #DISABLE_FOR_LLVM_PROGRAMS := 1 PROGRAM_REQUIRED_TO_EXIT_OK := 1 #REQUIRES_EH_SUPPORT := 1 PROGRAMS_TO_TEST := $(patsubst $(SourceDir)/%,%,$(basename $(wildcard $(SourceDir)/*.ll))) include $(LEVEL)/Makefile.programs .PRECIOUS: Output/%.linked.rll Output/%.linked.rbc: Output/%.bc -cp -f $< $@ # since there is no native use llc output Output/%.native: Output/%.bc Output/.dir -$(L...

...y ideas about what is going wrong here? No idea why this stuff was there... Index: TEST.libcalls.Makefile =================================================================== --- TEST.libcalls.Makefile (revision 92512) +++ TEST.libcalls.Makefile (working copy) @@ -21,12 +21,11 @@ @cat $< $(PROGRAMS_TO_TEST:%=Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt): \ -Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) \ +Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) $(VERB) $(RM) -f $@ @echo "---------------------------------------------------------------" >> $@ @echo ">>> =...

...fixed on mainline, thanks. -Chris > > Index: TEST.libcalls.Makefile > =================================================================== > --- TEST.libcalls.Makefile (revision 92512) > +++ TEST.libcalls.Makefile (working copy) > @@ -21,12 +21,11 @@ > @cat $< > > $(PROGRAMS_TO_TEST:%=Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt): \ > -Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) \ > +Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) > $(VERB) $(RM) -f $@ > @echo > "---------------------------------------------------------------" >> >...

...some lines got moved, fixed on mainline, thanks. Not really fixed :-) Please commit this: Index: TEST.libcalls.Makefile =================================================================== --- TEST.libcalls.Makefile (revision 92749) +++ TEST.libcalls.Makefile (working copy) @@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ $(PROGRAMS_TO_TEST:%=Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt): \ Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) \ $(PROJ_SRC_ROOT)/TEST.libcalls.Makefile + $(VERB) $(RM) -f $@ @echo "---------------------------------------------------------------" >> $@ @echo ">>> ========= '$...

...n file.s and file.S, +# it always run the preprocessor. One way to disable that is to force the +# language to be assembler (not assembler-with-cpp). +FORCEASM = +ifeq ($(OS),Darwin) +FORCEASM = -x assembler +endif + # Assemble (and link) an LLVM-linked program using the system assembler... # $(PROGRAMS_TO_TEST:%=Output/%.llc): \ Output/%.llc: Output/%.llc.s - -$(LLVMGCCLD) $< -o $@ $(LLCLIBS) $(LLCASSEMBLERFLAGS) $(TARGET_FLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) + -$(LLVMGCCLD) $(FORCEASM) $< -o $@ $(LLCLIBS) $(LLCASSEMBLERFLAGS) \ + $(TARGET_FLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(PROGRAMS_TO_TEST:%=Output/%.llc-beta): \ Output/%.llc...

This is what I get while trying to run 'make TEST=libcalls' in the top dir of test-suite: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/gregory/thesis/llvm/projects/test-suite/SingleSource' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/gregory/thesis/llvm/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests' make[3]: Entering directory

On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > > I have a doubt. > > This is an excerpt of the raw report I get after running Spec benchmarks > through llvm-test.I am trying to calculate the program execution > time.Does the output result in bold corresponds to "lli time" in > Makefile.spec ? I am not interested in llc, jit or cbe.I simply need the > normal

I have a doubt. This is an excerpt of the raw report I get after running Spec benchmarks through llvm-test.I am trying to calculate the program execution time.Does the output result in bold corresponds to "lli time" in Makefile.spec ? I am not interested in llc, jit or cbe.I simply need the normal bytecode and native code execution times after running my pass over them.I have modified

> LLVM tools and LLVM-GCC I've built seem to work. > Can it be due to LLVM_SRC_ROOT == LLVM_OBJ_ROOT? No. This is usually due to absence of llvm-gcc. You need reconfigure llvm once again with lvm-gcc path added and make sure it was hooked properly (look into Makefile.config for paths, etc). -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg

...thanks. > > Not really fixed :-) Please commit this: > > Index: TEST.libcalls.Makefile > =================================================================== > --- TEST.libcalls.Makefile (revision 92749) > +++ TEST.libcalls.Makefile (working copy) > @@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ > $(PROGRAMS_TO_TEST:%=Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt): \ > Output/%.$(TEST).report.txt: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) \ > $(PROJ_SRC_ROOT)/TEST.libcalls.Makefile > + $(VERB) $(RM) -f $@ > @echo > "---------------------------------------------------------------" >> > $@ > @echo &...

...needed by `Output/sse.expandfft.linked.bc'. Stop. means that make is trying to build this (from Makefile.programs): # Given an unoptimized bytecode file that is a simple linkage of all # the program's bytecode files, optimize the program using the # standard compilation optimizations. $(PROGRAMS_TO_TEST:%=Output/%.linked.bc): \ Output/%.linked.bc: Output/%.linked.rbc $(LOPT) $(VERB) $(RM) -f $(CURDIR)/$@.info -$(LOPT) -std-compile-opts -info-output-file=$(CURDIR)/$@.info $(STATS) $(EXTRA_LOPT_OPTIONS) $< -o $@ -f But for some strange reason it can't find this rule (from Mak...

Reid Spencer wrote: > Have you modified the makefile in any way? Note that sse.expantfft.bc should be sse.expandfft.bc no, did'nt change it. the typo before seems to be an error while copying from the terminal. i've cleaned everything and tried again. this is the messsage: [brandner:/localtmp/brandner/dev/llvm-test:529] make -j1 TEST=nightly 2>&1 | tee report.nightly.raw.out

Hi, I am currently trying to set up new performance and regression testers for Polly and LLVM and would like to XFAIL two test cases. I am using the LNTBuilder instead of the NightlyTestBuilder out of the assumption that the LNTBuilder is the more modern solution. However, when trying to xfail test cases I realized the xfail=[] parameter of getLNTFactor is ignored. Previously this was not an

After following all steps from http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#testsuiterun, I've got this: make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/projects/thesis/llvm-suite-2.6/llvm-2.6/projects/test-suite/SingleSource' make[2]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/projects/thesis/llvm-suite-2.6/llvm-2.6/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests' make[3]: Entering directory