Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "program_opt".
Did you mean:
program_old
2013 May 14
0
[LLVMdev] CommandLine: using cl::Positional with enum
...> to do that.
>
Ok, ok, but, if you end up fixing this, please keep me post.
> If you are really desperate to have the command line options in the
> way you want they you may need to implement it yourself or use another
> library (e.g.http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_53_0/doc/html/program_options.html [ http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_53_0/doc/html/program_options.html ]
> ).
>
> Personally I think it's more important your tool does something rather
> than spending time worrying about how it's command line interface
> looks, so I would personally just implement e...
2010 Oct 09
0
[LLVMdev] how to disable command line options in llvm libs
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Jochen Wilhelmy <j.wilhelmy at arcor.de> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to use llvm::cl as it seems quite easy to use, but there
> currently seems to be
> a major drawback: if I do -help then all options from all llvm libs that
> I have included
> are shown, but I just have an input file and output file to specify.
I've always found
2010 Oct 09
2
[LLVMdev] how to disable command line options in llvm libs
Hi!
I'd like to use llvm::cl as it seems quite easy to use, but there
currently seems to be
a major drawback: if I do -help then all options from all llvm libs that
I have included
are shown, but I just have an input file and output file to specify. Is
it possible to
disable the existing options? For example by assigning each option a flag.
One flag could be for llvm options, another for
2011 Jan 14
1
[LLVMdev] Building Boost library failed with Clang 2.9
...- date_time : building
- filesystem : building
- graph : building
- graph_parallel : building
- iostreams : building
- math : building
- mpi : building
- program_options : building
- python : building
- random : building
- regex : building
- serialization : building
- signals : building
- system : building
- test...
2013 May 12
0
[LLVMdev] CommandLine: using cl::Positional with enum
...ibrary but is
going to be a long time before I can look at it. So don't wait for me
to do that.
If you are really desperate to have the command line options in the
way you want they you may need to implement it yourself or use another
library (e.g. http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_53_0/doc/html/program_options.html
).
Personally I think it's more important your tool does something rather
than spending time worrying about how it's command line interface
looks, so I would personally just implement everything as an optional
argument and then after parsing check yourself that your options have
b...