Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "progit".
Did you mean:
profit
2015 Apr 07
2
GSoC - Syncing docs between GitHub and CentOS's git repo
Hi Kunal!
Thanks for your reply! I think the official mirroring is a great method because of higher efficiency.
Another thing I am trying to solve is how to retrieve and store all the discussion / issue / PR on GitHub? These functions are great for a doc toolchain. However we shouldn?t rely on GitHub as a part of our project. My plan now is to use bugs.cents.org as a place to discuss about docs
2016 Jun 03
3
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?)
>On 3 June 2016 at 10:03, George Rimar via llvm-dev
><llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> +1. I am also bit concerned here. Never used git, but it is fine, I am ready to learn,
>> but now when I am using TortoiseSVN the only command line I am using is for creating the
>> final patch (though I think that is also available in GUI).
>> And what I heard in this
2011 Sep 03
0
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
...39;s not much more to learn :)
>
>
> That doesn't tell me anything. And unfortunately they are used in many git commands.
Just in case you want to know more about objects and refs, you can read the first sections of the chapter 9 of the free "Pro git" online book.
http://progit.org/book/ch9-0.html
This chapter is about git internal, so it may look a little complex and scary, but it is really helpful to understand how git works.
-- Jean-Daniel
2015 Apr 07
0
GSoC - Syncing docs between GitHub and CentOS's git repo
...____________________
I've found bugzilla to be great for tracking actual flaws in the product,
but not great for internal discussion and process tracking. Lists or Trac
can be better, respectively. I'm also keeping a close eye on pagure,
http://blog.pingoured.fr/index.php?post/2015/03/25/Progit-is-dead%2C-long-live-pagure
--Pete
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20150407/3a9bbb41/attachment.html>
2011 Sep 03
5
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
On Sep 3, 2011, at 5:01 AM, FlyLanguage wrote:
>> On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:15 PM, FlyLanguage wrote:
>>
>>>> Is that really true? I've heard of a lot of LLVM developers using git
>>>> but it all seems very opaque right now. That's why I hope to get people
>>>> talking so we can find out where everyone is and go from there.
>>>