Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "proeprly".
Did you mean:
proeply
2024 Jul 28
1
[PATCH v2 02/37] drm/nouveau: handle pci/tegra drm_dev_{alloc, register} from common code
...13:08PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I think we're on the same page with all that. As clarified in [1], that's not a
> big concern, I was referring to the changes required to integrate the auxbus
> stuff.
Well, I see this thread having the realization that things are not
setup proeprly to use devres. To be fair devres creates almost as many
bugs as it solves :\ cleanup.h is possibly a better option for most
simple things and harder to misuse...
> > normal (though most subsystems would call that unregister, not put)
>
> A DRM device is reference counted and can out-l...
2024 Jul 28
1
[PATCH v2 02/37] drm/nouveau: handle pci/tegra drm_dev_{alloc, register} from common code
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 03:13:08PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 11:07:19PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
>
> > > Right, I think I took that too literally.
> > >
> > > The lifetime of the DRM device (or more precisely one of its references) is
> > > bound to the binding between the parent device and its corresponding driver.
>