search for: prodsyse

...oor (maybe round) of non-negative numerics, though. Poisson should > never have anything after decimal. > > Still think it?s worth allowing long long for R64 bit, just for purity > sake. > > Avi > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:38 PM Spencer Graves > <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com <mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>> wrote: > > > > On 2020-01-19 13:01, Avraham Adler wrote: >> Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is Poisson in the >> sum, can you break your ?big? simulation into the sum of a few >> smal...

...max = 2147483647 = 2^31 > 1e9.? That still means that a Poisson distributed pseudo-random number just under that would have to be over 23000 standard deviations above the mean to exceed .Machine$integer.max. > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 1:58 PM Spencer Graves > <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com <mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>> wrote: > > ????? This issue arose for me in simulations to estimate > confidence, prediction, and tolerance intervals from glm(., > family=poisson) fits embedded in a BMA::bic.glm fit using a > simulate.bic.glm fun...

...mode to inherit that randomness? > > > On 1/19/20 10:47 AM, Avraham Adler wrote: > > Maybe there should be code for 64 bit R to use long long or the > like? > > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:45 AM Spencer Graves > > <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com > <mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> > <mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com > <mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >? ? ?On 2020-01-19 09:34, Benjamin Tyner wrote: > >? ?...

...t;>> never have anything after decimal. >>> >>> Still think it?s worth allowing long long for R64 bit, just for purity >>> sake. >>> >>> Avi >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:38 PM Spencer Graves >>> <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com <mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2020-01-19 13:01, Avraham Adler wrote: >>>> Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is Poisson in the >>>> sum, can you break your ?big?...

...lization of a random variable. Do we really want the storage mode to inherit that randomness? On 1/19/20 10:47 AM, Avraham Adler wrote: > Maybe there should be code for 64 bit R to use long long or the like? > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:45 AM Spencer Graves > <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com <mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>> wrote: > > > > On 2020-01-19 09:34, Benjamin Tyner wrote: > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> Hello, All: > >> > >> >...

...numerics, though. Poisson should >> never have anything after decimal. >> >> Still think it?s worth allowing long long for R64 bit, just for purity >> sake. >> >> Avi >> >> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:38 PM Spencer Graves >> <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com <mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2020-01-19 13:01, Avraham Adler wrote: >>> Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is Poisson in the >>> sum, can you break your ?big? simulation into the sum of...

...>>>> Still think it?s worth allowing long long for R64 bit, just for purity >>>> sake. >>>> >>>> Avi >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:38 PM Spencer Graves >>>> <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com <mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2020-01-19 13:01, Avraham Adler wrote: >>>>> Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is Poisson in the >>>&g...

...passphrase if they are created without one. This is likely not an issue, but if it turns out to be a problem, you can either add passphrase to the default keys, or create another set of keys, passphrase protected. Cheers, Ott On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 9:51 PM Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote: > > > On 2019-06-30 06:58, Joshua Ulrich wrote: > <snip> > > > I imported both packages into separate repositories: > > https://github.com/joshuaulrich/tmp-ecdat > > https://github.com/joshuaulrich/tmp-ecfun > > > > I changed your e...

...This is likely not an issue, but if it turns out to be a > problem, you can either add passphrase to the default keys, or create > another set of keys, passphrase protected. > > Cheers, > Ott > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 9:51 PM Spencer Graves > <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com <mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>> wrote: > > > > On 2019-06-30 06:58, Joshua Ulrich wrote: > <snip> > > > I imported both packages into separate repositories: > > https://github.com/joshuaulrich/tmp-ecdat > > https://...

...traints by adding the b. > > http://users.eecs.northwestern.edu/~morales/PSfiles/acm-remark.pdf > <http://users.eecs.northwestern.edu/%7Emorales/PSfiles/acm-remark.pdf> > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Spencer Graves > <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com <mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>> wrote: > > Hello: > > > The development version of Ecdat on R-Forge contains a > vignette in which optim(?, method=?L-BFGS-B?) stops with an error > message while violating the lower bound. > > &g...

...ng of "git" and GitHub.? I could use suggestions on how to do this -- or at least on how to find documentation on how to do this. ????? Thanks, ????? Spencer On 2019-06-29 14:09, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 9:43 AM Spencer Graves > <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote: >> Hi, Ott et al.: >> >> >> What's the best way to get "Travis CI" to build and test the two >> packages, Ecdat and Ecfun, that have long been combined in the Ecdat >> project? >> >> >> Following Ott&...

...9;t tested this though).? But for > push you have to have that in order. > > I suggest you create ssh keys, upload those to GH, and use ssh > authorization instead of https. > > Cheers, > Ott > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 8:18 PM Spencer Graves > <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com <mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>> wrote: > > Thanks to Duncan, Henrik and Henrik, Brian, and G?bor: > > > ?????? I created a local copy of the new GitHub version using the > following: > > git clone > https://sbgraves237:mypassword...

...if it turns out to be a >> problem, you can either add passphrase to the default keys, or create >> another set of keys, passphrase protected. >> >> Cheers, >> Ott >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 9:51 PM Spencer Graves >> <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com <mailto:spencer.graves at prodsyse.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2019-06-30 06:58, Joshua Ulrich wrote: >> <snip> >> >> > I imported both packages into separate repositories: >> >https://github.com/joshuaulr...

Floor (maybe round) of non-negative numerics, though. Poisson should never have anything after decimal. Still think it?s worth allowing long long for R64 bit, just for purity sake. Avi On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:38 PM Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote: > > > On 2020-01-19 13:01, Avraham Adler wrote: > > Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is Poisson in the sum, can > you break your ?big? simulation into the sum of a few smaller ones? Or is > the order of magnitude difference just too great? > &g...

On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 9:46 PM Joshua Ulrich <josh.m.ulrich at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 6:06 PM Spencer Graves > <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, Henrik et al.: > > > > > > What's your favorite documentation on how to make two GitHub > > projects from one containing two packages? > > > > > > Currently, "github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat" c...

On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 6:06 PM Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote: > > Hi, Henrik et al.: > > > What's your favorite documentation on how to make two GitHub > projects from one containing two packages? > > > Currently, "github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat" consists primarily of a > directory "p...

Hello: The development version of Ecdat on R-Forge contains a vignette in which optim(?, method=?L-BFGS-B?) stops with an error message while violating the lower bound. To see all the details, try the following: install.packages("Ecdat", repos="http://R-Forge.R-project.org") Then do "help(pac=Ecdat)" -> "User guides, package

On 2020-01-19 09:34, Benjamin Tyner wrote: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Hello, All: >> >> >> ? ????? Consider: >> >> >> Browse[2]> set.seed(1) >> Browse[2]> rpois(9, 1e10) >> NAs produced[1] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA >> >> >> ? ????? Should this happen? >>

Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is Poisson in the sum, can you break your ?big? simulation into the sum of a few smaller ones? Or is the order of magnitude difference just too great? On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 1:58 PM Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote: > This issue arose for me in simulations to estimate confidence, > prediction, and tolerance intervals from glm(., family=poisson) fits > embedded in a BMA::bic.glm fit using a simulate.bic.glm function I added to > the development version of Ecfun, available at &g...

Hello: ????? Suggestions for whomever maintains "R CMD": ??? ??????? 1.? Can you change it so it doesn't complain about the presence of ".travis.yml", at least on GitHub? ??? ??????? 2.? What do you suggest people do to find error messages in the output?? I ask, because I'm getting "build failing" from travis-ci.org, but I can't see what failed