search for: prodedure

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "prodedure".

Did you mean: procedure
2011 Nov 01
0
[LLVMdev] Contributing new backend to LLVM
...f the patches consist of, quite naturally, new > files.  I have looked for guidelines for submitting a new backend, but > have not found anything.  Is there anything of that nature?  If not, my > plan is to simply submit the two patches.  Any other suggestions? There isn't any special prodedure for submitting new backends... standard patch review guidelines apply. Make sure you include tests. -Eli
2011 Nov 01
4
[LLVMdev] Contributing new backend to LLVM
Hello all, We would like to contribute a new backend for Qualcomm's Hexagon processor. We will actively maintain the port once it is accepted. Hexagon is a VLIW core that is used principally in modem and low power audio applications in Qualcomm's chip sets. We have a patch for both llvm and for clang. As this is a new port, these patches are quite large (approximately 26k and 3k
2011 Nov 01
2
[LLVMdev] Contributing new backend to LLVM
...f the patches consist of, quite naturally, new > files.  I have looked for guidelines for submitting a new backend, but > have not found anything.  Is there anything of that nature?  If not, my > plan is to simply submit the two patches.  Any other suggestions? There isn't any special prodedure for submitting new backends... standard patch review guidelines apply. Make sure you include tests. -Eli _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
2001 Dec 19
1
Replacing NT4 PDC with Samba 2.2.2
Hi Haven't seen any responses to my earlier post (Transferring PDC duties to Samba) so here's a slightly different approach I'm trying which someone can hopefully shed some light on. Is it possible to transfer domain-specific data from an NT4 PDC to a Samba 2.2.2 server, switch off the NT4 machine, set up smb.conf, switch on the Samba box such that the attached NT4/Win2000
2003 May 21
1
netstat/ipcs inside jail
...un2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa Opened by PID 258 tun1: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::250:8dff:fe47:e567%tun1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xb Opened by PID 3290 --> when i built the jail, i cvsupped the stable branch, then i followed the prodedure described in man jail. i then rebuilt my kernel maybe i'm missing a device in the jail, maybe i have a route problem. maybe it's the absence of the loopback .. i'm not sure what to look for really. i rebuilt the world on the host with exactly the same sources as the jail, all is sync....