search for: process_query

...gt; 10, :data => "yes"}, {:num => 10, :data => "no"}, {:num => 100, :data => "yes"}, {:num => 100, :data => "no"}, {:num => 1000, :data => "yes"}, {:num => 1000, :data => "no"} ] ?> puts index.process_query(''data:yes AND num:[10 100]'') +data:yes +num:[10 100] => nil >> puts index.search(''d:data:yes AND num:[10 100]'') TopDocs: total_hits = 2, max_score = 1.777895 [ 2 "": 1.777895 4 "": 1.777895 ] => nil >>...

...ll as adding the two separate terms. So "set-up" becomes "setup", "set", "up" so searches for "set-up", "setup" or just plain "set" will all match. This filter is also applied to the StandardAnalyzer. I''ve also made the process_query method in Index::Index public. Before anyone asks, the reason it is process_query and not parse_query is that it accepts strings or query objects and may also optimize queries in future. Have at it, Dave

...wants doc_id [Integer] def doc(doc_id) return self.searcher[doc_id] rescue Exception => e puts "** IndexSearcher(#{object_type}).doc #{doc_id}\n" << e.backtrace.join("\n") return nil end alias :[] :doc ############################# # Querying methods def process_query(query) query.is_a?(Ferret::Search::Query) ? query : SearchIndex::QUERY_PARSER.parse(query) end def search(query, options = {}) query_obj = process_query(query) self.searcher.search( query_obj, options ) end def search_each (query, options = {}) query_obj = process_query(query) self....

...ubygems'' irb(main):003:0> require ''ferret'' irb(main):004:0> include Ferret irb(main):005:0> index = Index::Index.new irb(main):008:0> index << "something" # Now the error while processing "bol?" irb(main):009:0> query = index.process_query("bo\303\264") /opt/csw/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.11.4/lib/ferret/index.rb:749:in `parse'': failed to allocate memory (NoMemoryError) from /opt/csw/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.11.4/lib/ferret/index.rb:749:in `do_process_query'' from /opt/csw/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems...

Using acts_as_ferret I''m trying to do a query like: active:(true) title|body:(#{params[:s]}) product_price:( >= #{params[:min]}) Where I want to return only the active products that contain the search term in the title or body and has a minimum price >= params[:min] I''m finding that even though I''m indexing the product price as an integer (so no .00 to cause

Hi guys, Is there some way of getting ferret matches string, when i do a fuzzy search? The scenario is this: 1. The user search for ''show'' 2. Nothing was found 3. So I do a fuzzy search, passing ''show~'' 4. It gives me somes results, most of all was matched with ''showcase'' 5. So I want to tell the user that: Nothing was found with

...pp:561) ==27130== by 0xA25EA99: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeObject() (MCJIT.cpp:173) ==27130== by 0xAB57918: LLVMGetPointerToGlobal (ExecutionEngineBindings.cpp:332) ==27130== by 0x4E4813D: compile_query (ql.c:2286) ==27130== by 0x4E4836A: tusto_ql_compile (ql.c:2322) ==27130== by 0x402D19: process_query (ts_util.c:167) ==27130== by 0x403205: run_shell (ts_util.c:296) I have source tree checked out at f46e5eadc307beaef6e8dd0602bb4c63ca41fd50. To create MCJIT i use provided llvm-c apis: LLVMInitializeMCJITCompilerOptions(&options, sizeof(options)); options.OptLevel = MODULE_OPT_LEVEL; /* 3...

...build_index. The data is in utf-8. Now calling Location.find_by_contents "?" does not return a result, causes a lot of CPU load, and finally exits with an error "index.rb:702: in ''parse'': failed to allocate memory (NoMemoryError)". Seems a problem in ''process_query''. Similar results for sometimes for other German Umlauts... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...xA25EA99: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeObject() (MCJIT.cpp:173) > ==27130== by 0xAB57918: LLVMGetPointerToGlobal > (ExecutionEngineBindings.cpp:332) > ==27130== by 0x4E4813D: compile_query (ql.c:2286) > ==27130== by 0x4E4836A: tusto_ql_compile (ql.c:2322) > ==27130== by 0x402D19: process_query (ts_util.c:167) > ==27130== by 0x403205: run_shell (ts_util.c:296) > > I have source tree checked out at f46e5eadc307beaef6e8dd0602bb4c63ca41fd50. > To create MCJIT i use provided llvm-c apis: > > LLVMInitializeMCJITCompilerOptions(&options, sizeof(options)); > options....

.../usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.11.3/lib/ferret/index.rb:706:in `ensure_reader_open'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.11.3/lib/ferret/index.rb:713:in `ensure_searcher_open'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.11.3/lib/ferret/index.rb:658:in `process_query'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/monitor.rb:238:in `synchronize'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.11.3/lib/ferret/index.rb:657:in `process_query'' /vendor/plugins/acts_as_ferret/lib/local_index.rb:87:in `find_id_by_contents'' /vendor/plugins/acts_...

I''m getting some results that I don''t understand from a search. The code, based on the tutorial, and the results are below. Everything makes sense to me, except the results for the ''title:"Some"'' query. I would think that it should match the first two documents, but not the third. What am I missing here? Thanks for any help! --- code

...- range_new Upper bound must be greater than lower bound. "1137702" < "172098" from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.10.1/lib/ferret/index.rb:572:in `parse'' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.10.1/lib/ferret/index.rb:572:in `process_query'' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.10.1/lib/ferret/index.rb:560:in `do_search'' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.10.1/lib/ferret/index.rb:233:in `search'' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/monitor.rb:229:in `synchronize'' fr...

I am using ferret to build a search application for my site. I used stemming analyzer to build the index. When i searched "market" i get hits but on searching "marketing" i get no hits,while there are fields containing the word marketing. I am using stemming analyzer even while searching. Is the problem with the analyzer? Or am I missing out something -------------- next part

Hi, I have a user model that has a city field which is searchable using acts_as_ferret. But I can''t get it to return any result whether I use :city => {:store => :no, :index => :untokenized}, or :city => {:store => :no} in my User model''s acts_as_ferret option >>> User.find_by_contents("city:(cal poly)") =>

Hi all, I''ve posted that few weeks ago but no one answered, but this feature is REALLY important for us. I have many objects with a url field, of course containing standards urls... I''m trying to match them but i actually got problems with that. Here''s a little code of what i would like to achieve: require ''rubygems'' require

...ugins/acts_as_ferret/lib/multi_index.rb:82:in `initialize'' /vendor/plugins/acts_as_ferret/lib/multi_index.rb:82:in `ensure_searcher'' /vendor/plugins/acts_as_ferret/lib/multi_index.rb:51:in `query_parser'' /vendor/plugins/acts_as_ferret/lib/multi_index.rb:60:in `process_query'' /vendor/plugins/acts_as_ferret/lib/multi_index.rb:26:in `search_each'' /vendor/plugins/acts_as_ferret/lib/class_methods.rb:442:in `id_multi_search'' /vendor/plugins/acts_as_ferret/lib/class_methods.rb:422:in `multi_search'' /app/controllers/search_c...

Hi! I thought I understood Ferret''s query scoring and how to tweak results using boost values. What I currently experience however, leaves me completely baffled. Perhaps someone can shed some light on the scoring algorithm, because asking Ferret to "explain" the score for a particular document isn''t as informative as I thought. Actually, it confuses me even