search for: process_pending_change_notify_queue

...:31:39, 5] smbd/oplock.c:receive_local_message(107) receive_local_message: doing select with timeout of 1 ms [2004/10/16 22:31:39, 3] smbd/notify_kernel.c:kernel_check_notify(99) kernel_check_notify: kernel change notify on . fd[0]=28 (signals_received=2) [2004/10/16 22:31:39, 10] smbd/notify.c:process_pending_change_notify_queue(161) process_pending_change_notify_queue: dir . changed ! [2004/10/16 22:31:39, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(105) error string = Interrupted system call [2004/10/16 22:31:39, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(129) error packet at smbd/notify.c(55) cmd=160 (SMBnttrans) NT code 0x0000010c [2004/10/1...

...:11:44, 5] smbd/oplock.c:receive_local_message(108) receive_local_message: doing select with timeout of 1 ms [2003/07/22 13:11:44, 3] smbd/notify_kernel.c:kernel_check_notify(99) kernel_check_notify: kernel change notify on . fd[0]=24 (signals_received=2) [2003/07/22 13:11:44, 10] smbd/notify.c:process_pending_change_notify_queue(161) process_pending_change_notify_queue: dir . changed ! [2003/07/22 13:11:44, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(94) error string = Interrupted system call [2003/07/22 13:11:44, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(113) error packet at smbd/notify.c(55) cmd=160 (SMBnttrans) NT code 0x0000010c [2003/07/22...

Hello, Back when 2.2.2 was the current samba release I came across the following problem when deleting folders in Windows 2000 which I'll repost again below. After I finally got his attention with a few very wordy messages to the samba mailing list, Jeremy fixed it blazingly fast and wrote me back: "I just found the problem and fixed it in 2.2 CVS and HEAD CVS. It was to do with the

I have just been upgrading my Samba servers from 1.9.18p10 to 2.0.6 So far as I can tell users have been happy (or at least not noticed!). Our clients are almost exclusively NT 4.0 (most at SP5). Our servers are Suns running Solaris 2.5.1 and 7. On upgrading 2 of our busier servers (for admin - home directories and NT binaries), I observed a considerable increase in server load. Home server

...name, newname )); status = rename_internals(conn, fname, base_name, 0, overwrite, False); } + if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + if (open_was_deferred(SVAL(inbuf,smb_mid))) { + /* We have re-scheduled this call. */ + return -1; + } return ERROR_NT(status); } + process_pending_change_notify_queue((time_t)0); SSVAL(params,0,0); send_trans2_replies(outbuf, bufsize, params, 2, *ppdata, 0); -------------- next part -------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFv7OdIR7qMdg1EfYRAvqJAKDxefpzTjYvJWyHB0D/7hZ+tx417QCfaD9k G+tjNn+wuqQeRDWcvuCc...

...name, newname )); status = rename_internals(conn, fname, base_name, 0, overwrite, False); } + if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + if (open_was_deferred(SVAL(inbuf,smb_mid))) { + /* We have re-scheduled this call. */ + return -1; + } return ERROR_NT(status); } + process_pending_change_notify_queue((time_t)0); SSVAL(params,0,0); send_trans2_replies(outbuf, bufsize, params, 2, *ppdata, 0); -------------- next part -------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFv7OdIR7qMdg1EfYRAvqJAKDxefpzTjYvJWyHB0D/7hZ+tx417QCfaD9k G+tjNn+wuqQeRDWcvuCcb...