Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "process_lanman_packet".
2014 Aug 06
1
process_lanman_packet: Discarding datagram from IP x.x.x.x. Source name LINUX<00> is one of our names !
Aug 6 11:21:44 linux nmbd[2193]: [2014/08/06 11:21:44.614859, 0]
../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet)
Aug 6 11:21:44 linux nmbd[2193]: process_lanman_packet: Discarding
datagram from IP 192.168.1.6. Source name LINUX<00> is one of our names !
Aug 6 11:22:50 linux nmbd[2193]: [2014/08/06 11:22:50.279516, 0]
../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet)
Aug 6 11:22:50 linux...
2016 Jan 05
2
process_lanman_packet: Discarding datagram from IP 192.168.100.29. Source name STORAGE7<00> is one of our names !
...y separate networks, and I find it
unlikely both networks should have some sort of undetected loop. Any
ideas on how to debug this? Samba version is 4.1.18.
FreeNAS box on network A
"
Jan 5 23:17:43 storage7 nmbd[18901]: [2016/01/05 23:17:43.054231, 0]
../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet)
Jan 5 23:17:43 storage7 nmbd[18901]: process_lanman_packet:
Discarding datagram from IP 192.168.100.29. Source name STORAGE7<00> is
one of our names !
"
TrueNAS active node network A
"
Jan 5 23:17:43 storage8 nmbd[21114]: [2016/01/05 23:17:43.052040, 0]
../source3/nmbd/nmb...
2016 Jan 06
0
process_lanman_packet: Discarding datagram from IP 192.168.100.29. Source name STORAGE7<00> is one of our names !
...it
> unlikely both networks should have some sort of undetected loop. Any
> ideas on how to debug this? Samba version is 4.1.18.
>
> FreeNAS box on network A
> "
> Jan 5 23:17:43 storage7 nmbd[18901]: [2016/01/05 23:17:43.054231,
> 0] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet)
> Jan 5 23:17:43 storage7 nmbd[18901]: process_lanman_packet:
> Discarding datagram from IP 192.168.100.29. Source name STORAGE7<00>
> is one of our names !
> "
>
> TrueNAS active node network A
> "
> Jan 5 23:17:43 storage8 nmbd[21114]: [2016/01/05 23:...
2016 Jan 06
1
process_lanman_packet: Discarding datagram from IP 192.168.100.29. Source name STORAGE7<00> is one of our names !
On 01/06/2016 01:23 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> Jan 5 23:17:32 storage4 nmbd[34068]: [2016/01/05 23:17:32.086480,
>> 0] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1174(process_lanman_packet)
>> Jan 5 23:17:32 storage4 nmbd[34068]: process_lanman_packet:
>> Discarding datagram from IP 172.21.140.17. Source name STORAGE4<00>
>> is one of our names !
>> "
>
> Are you forwarding broadcasts ? This is a debug level 0 log
> coming from process_l...
1998 Nov 23
1
SAMBA digest 1883
> I am an analyst for a large corporation and am interested in using Samba
> in
> a project for mine. I need one piece of the puzzle answered for me
> though.
> Can anyone tell me what is the maximum size of a file system can Samba
> see.
> I'm talking in Terabytes. If anyone could answer this for me, I'd truly
> appreciate it. Could you send any responses to
1998 Nov 23
0
Freebsd + NT/Nt-Client am Linux-Server
...samba server doesn't show up in a regular browse list but if I use
> "find computer" it shows up no problem.
>
> I have Advanced File and Print Server on an SCO box that is acting as
> the PDC (I believe my problem lies here) and in the log.nmb I get a
> message "process_lanman_packet: on subnet 192.168.1.8 ignoring browse
> packet command code 4 from MHI#00600<20> IP 192.168.1.2 to AFPS<00>"
> where .8 is the samba server and MHI is the SCO box and AFPS is the
> domain name.
>
> If anyone has any suggestions or even tell me I am stupid and where...
1998 Mar 05
14
Browsing
I am configuring Linux (2.0.33) as a local router. I am wanting to use
Samba (1.9.18p3) to "manage" the browse lists on my network so that
computers on each subnet can browse resources on the other subnets. My
local network consists of Win95 and NT40 workstations with NT40 servers.
My test configuration consists one token ring segment on one side of
the Samba box (network .192) and