search for: process_dgram

...well so far except for two somewhat 'special' clients. For these I observe the following: 1) On the AD Member Server periodically (every hour) appears a message in log.nmbd similar to the following for each of the two clients: [2014/04/15 13:47:46, 0] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1289(process_dgram) process_dgram: ignoring malformed3 (datasize = 494, len=408, off=100) datagram packet sent to name MYDOM<00> from IP 192.168.0.107 2) On at least one of the clients the file shares from the AD Member Server disconnect from time to time, especially when the client has not been touched for...

...nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:listen_for_packets(1833) discarding own dgram packet from 10.10.20.1:138 [2006/09/21 12:35:25, 9] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:find_name_on_subnet(127) find_name_on_subnet: on subnet 10.10.20.1 - found name DOMAIN_UK<1d> source=2 [2006/09/21 12:35:25, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1270) process_dgram: datagram from UK_PDC<00> to DOMAIN_UK<1d> IP 10.10.20.1 for \MAILSLOT\BROWSE of type 1 len=39 [2006/09/21 12:35:25, 8] lib/util.c:is_myname(2036) is_myname("UK_PDC") returns 1 [2006/09/21 12:35:25, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_browse_packet(1061)...

Hi everyone. I just got a copy of Win2k in and have been messing with it. Have a question, and have searched the archives for the answer, but didn't find it. Can Win2k domain logon to a pre-3.0.0 samba server? Or di I need to get TNG running? I can get NT4.0 boxes to authenticate and login fine (Samba pre-3.0.0), but Win2k keeps complaining: "The following error occurred validating

...vice path = /var/lib/samba/netlogon guest ok = yes locking = No [profiles] comment = Profile Share path = /var/lib/samba/profiles read only = No [tmp] comment = temporary files path = /tmp read only = yes -------------- next part -------------- [2004/10/05 11:14:43, 5] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1194) process_dgram: ignoring dgram packet sent to name COMPUTER LABS<1d> from 10.9.1.10 [2004/10/05 11:14:43, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(162) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for NWU_TEST on subnet 10.9.1.111: found. [2004/10/05 11:14:43, 10] nmbd/nmbd_...

...-SJG#20 ttl = 161432 first IP 192.168.213.12 flags = 44 --- "F-LAPTOP-SJG#00" 1070797025 192.168.213.12 44R "F-LAPTOP-SJG#20" 1070797016 192.168.213.12 44R --- 2). When the machine is plugged onto the network it introduces itself --- [2003/12/05 14:47:30, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1227) process_dgram: datagram from F-LAPTOP-SJG<00> to FUSION<1d> IP 192.168.213.29 for \MAILSLOT\BROWSE of type 2 len=15 [2003/12/05 14:47:30, 8] lib/util.c:is_myname(1677) is_myname("F-LAPTOP-SJG") returns 0 [2003/12/05 14:47:30, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:debug_browse_data(100)...

...0 == memcmp( "U86F.DOM<1b>", "U86F.DOM<1b>", 84 ) [Tue Dec 13 17:09:08 2005 , 9] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:find_name_on_subnet(123) find_name_on_subnet: on subnet 10.244.142.2 - found name U86F.DOM<1b> source=2 [Tue Dec 13 17:09:08 2005 , 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1266) process_dgram: datagram from NetRFC ^H<00> to U86F.DOM<1b> IP 10.244.142.1 for \MAILSLOT\NET\NTLOGON of type 18 len=92 [Tue Dec 13 17:09:08 2005 , 4] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(95) process_logon_packet: Logon from 10.244.142.1: code = 0x12 [Tue Dec 13 17:09...

...uot;MICROFORTE": The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted". I'm unsure how to interpret samba logs, if this little section doesn't help I've uploaded a larger section here: http://pastebin.ca/1312207 [2009/01/19 14:14:07, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1283) process_dgram: datagram from ATHENA<00> to MICROFORTE<1c> IP 10.40.3.253 for \MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON of type 18 len=59 [2009/01/19 14:14:07, 4] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(82) process_logon_packet: Logon from 10.40.3.253: code = 0x12 [2009/01/19 14:14:07,...

Hi guys, I'm having a little problem I would ask your help. I have followed the log of my samba (log.nmbd) and several times I see the message: process_dgram: ignoring malformed3 (datasize = X, len = Y, off = Z) datagram packet sent to name DOMAIN <00> from IP XXX,XXX,XXX,XXX Is there any way to fix this problem? I'm using Samba 3.5.6 integrated with LDAP server on a Debian Lenny 5.0.8. Thanks Daniel

Dear list, I have Debian Etch with Samba Version 3.0.24 configured as a PDC. Every day I get exactly 9 emails with panic action: > The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action, > was called for PID 4170 (). > > This means there was a problem with the program, such as a segfault. > However, the executable could not be found for process 4170. > It

...5] libsmb/nmblib.c:read_packet(757) Received a packet of len 201 from (xxx.xxx.xxx.64) port 138 [2004/12/03 10:41:09, 9] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:find_name_on_subnet(129) find_name_on_subnet: on subnet xxx.xxx.xxx.21 - name PHYSICS<1d> NOT FOUND [2004/12/03 10:41:09, 5] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1194) process_dgram: ignoring dgram packet sent to name PHYSICS<1d> from xxx.xxx.xxx.64 My Samba server is xxx.xxx.xxx.21. It is first saying it is able to find PHYSICS, but later can't find PHYSICS<1d>. Is anyone else having similar problems? As I say, it used to work just fi...

Hello, I'm having a problem logging in to the Samba domain from an XP machine. The machine is added to the domain but after reboot I can't login. I've done the signorseal registry hack but I'm still not able to login. The error I get when logging in is this: "Windows cannot connect to the domain, either because the domain controller is down or otherwise unavailable, or

...list_entry_compare() 1 == memcmp( "SYSTINET<1d>", "SYSTINET<00>", 84 ) [2005/05/15 02:50:27, 9] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:find_name_on_subnet(129) find_name_on_subnet: on subnet 10.0.0.56 - name SYSTINET<1d> NOT FOUND [2005/05/15 02:50:27, 5] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1194) process_dgram: ignoring dgram packet sent to name SYSTINET<1d> from 10.0.0.209 [2005/05/15 09:04:26, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(271) dump_workgroups() dump workgroup on subnet 10.0.0.56: netmask= 255.255.254.0: SYSTINET(1) current master browser...

...ico, 192.168.0.40 real hostname is marvin 192.168.0.4 Thanks in advance, /jarek read_udp_socket: lastip 192.168.0.24 lastport 138 read: 216 1998/11/03 15:40:06 received a packet of len 216 from (192.168.0.24) port 138 find_name_on_subnet: on subnet 192.168.0.40 - name RI<1d> NOT FOUND process_dgram: ignoring dgram packet sent to name RI<1d> from 192.168.0.24 find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for RI on subnet 192.168.0.40: found announce_myself_to_domain_master_browser: t (910104006) - last(910103267) < 900 dump_workgroups: dump workgroup on subnet 192.168.0.40: netmask=...

...mb/nmblib.c:read_packet(802) Received a packet of len 245 from (192.168.1.56) port 138 [2009/12/07 04:58:40, 9] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:find_name_on_subnet(126) find_name_on_subnet: on subnet 192.168.1.1 - found name CORP_TRIARIUS<1c> source=2 [2009/12/07 04:58:40, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1281) process_dgram: datagram from TRIARIUS-WP1<00> to CORP_TRIARIUS<1c> IP 192.168.1.56 for \MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON of type 18 len=71 [2009/12/07 04:58:40, 4] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(116) process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.1.56: code = 0x12 [2009/12/07 0...

...groupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(160) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for BCCFILOTTRANO on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2002/10/25 15:19:48, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:read_packet(719) Received a packet of len 207 from (10.113.160.22) port 138 [2002/10/25 15:19:48, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1276) process_dgram: datagram from FI0P22<00> to BCCFILOTTRANO<1d> IP 10.113.160.22 for \MAILSLOT\BROWSE of type 1 len=39 [2002/10/25 15:19:48, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:debug_browse_data(101) debug_browse_data(): 0 char ......FI0P22.... hex 01 93 a0 bb 0d 00 46 49 30 50 32 32 00 0...

...kgroupdb.c:170(find_workgroup_on_subnet) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for EB on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2013/07/15 16:39:26, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:797(read_packet) Received a packet of len 266 from (192.168.0.89) port 138 *[2013/07/15 16:39:26, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:1281(process_dgram)** ** process_dgram: datagram from WFASSI-PC<00> to EB<1c> IP 192.168.0.89 for \MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON of type 18 len=92* [2013/07/15 16:39:26, 4] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:116(process_logon_packet) process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.0.89: code = 0x12 [2013/07/15 16:39:26, 5]...

...samba 3.0 PDC and a XP client in VMWare. When i log locally, i can see the pdc and access the shares. then i can join the domain normally after a reboot, i try to authentify against the pdc and ... - i cant join inmost of the time - when it manage to communicate i've got this log (level 10) : process_dgram: datagram from LEBESGUE<00> to CTC94<1c> IP 99.4.23.230 for \MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON of type 18 len=88 process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from LEBESGUE(99.4.23.230) for , returning logon svr \\B99D-790 domain CTC94 code 13 token=ffff send_mailslot: Sending to mailslot \MAILSLOT\NE...

...;nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Sending a packet of len 215 to (192.168.1.199) on port 138<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Received a packet of len 243 from (192.168.1.199) port 138<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; process_dgram: datagram from ICILSZXPC24&lt;00&gt; to ICILSZX&lt;1c&gt; IP 192.168.1.199 for&nbsp; \MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON of type 18 len=69<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.1.199: code = 0x12<BR>&nbsp;...

Installed Samba 3.0.10 via 'pkgadd' on Solaris 2.6 - previously running Samba 2.2.8. It starts up and SWAT confirms that it is running and I am using the same smb.conf but I am unable to connect to a share via PC. Message "\\s080 is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access