search for: process_64

...nt copy steps fail; move the resulting identical code to a static inline in a common header. Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> --- arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 29 ++++++++--------------------- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 26 +++++--------------------- 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d884444 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io...

...riplett.org> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> --- v2: Rebased and updated for changes to copy_thread; no other changes in patch 1/3. arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 28 ++++++++-------------------- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 25 +++++-------------------- 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d884444 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io....

...riplett.org> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> --- v2: Rebased and updated for changes to copy_thread; no other changes in patch 1/3. arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 28 ++++++++-------------------- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 25 +++++-------------------- 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d884444 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io....

...ff-by: Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> --- v3: No changes in this patch, only in patch 3/3. arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 28 ++++++++-------------------- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 25 +++++-------------------- 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d884444 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io....

...ff-by: Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> --- v3: No changes in this patch, only in patch 3/3. arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 28 ++++++++-------------------- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 25 +++++-------------------- 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d884444 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process-io....

...ernel/entry_64.S | 9 ++-- arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 34 ++----------- arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 41 +++++---------- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 27 +++------- arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 8 +++ arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 4 +- drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 2 +- kernel/sys_ni.c | 5 ++ 18 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/x86...

...ernel/entry_64.S | 9 ++-- arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 34 ++----------- arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 41 +++++---------- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 27 +++------- arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 8 +++ arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 4 +- drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 2 +- kernel/sys_ni.c | 5 ++ 18 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/x86...

...86/kernel/entry_64.S | 9 +++-- arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 34 ++--------------- arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 13 ++----- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 8 ++++ arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 4 ++ drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 2 +- kernel/sys_ni.c | 5 +++ 17 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/ar...

...| 9 +++-- > arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 2 +- > arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 34 ++--------------- > arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 13 ++----- > arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 2 +- > arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 8 ++++ > arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 4 +- > drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 2 +- > kernel/sys_ni.c | 5 +++ > 17 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) > >...

...6/kernel/entry_64.S | 9 +++-- arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 34 ++--------------- arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 13 ++----- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 8 ++++ arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 4 +- drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 2 +- kernel/sys_ni.c | 5 +++ 17 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/ar...

...6/kernel/entry_64.S | 9 +++-- arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 34 ++--------------- arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 13 ++----- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 8 ++++ arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 4 +- drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 2 +- kernel/sys_ni.c | 5 +++ 17 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/ar...

...-by: Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ I don't particularly like this new file. It's also not in a proper place. > arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 29 ++++++++--------------------- > arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 26 +++++--------------------- Yay, this I like :). However, unification is best done in a separate step. First make the two parts equal in one or two patches. Then, in a separate patch, do the mechanical unification. > 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > create mode 1...

...-by: Josh Triplett <josh at joshtriplett.org> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ I don't particularly like this new file. It's also not in a proper place. > arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 29 ++++++++--------------------- > arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 26 +++++--------------------- Yay, this I like :). However, unification is best done in a separate step. First make the two parts equal in one or two patches. Then, in a separate patch, do the mechanical unification. > 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > create mode 1...

...kernel/entry_64.S | 9 ++-- arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 34 ++----------- arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 40 ++++----------- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 26 ++-------- arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 8 +++ arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 4 ++ drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 2 +- kernel/sys_ni.c | 5 ++ 18 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/x86...

...kernel/entry_64.S | 9 ++-- arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/process-io.h | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 34 ++----------- arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 40 ++++----------- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 26 ++-------- arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 8 +++ arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 4 ++ drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 2 +- kernel/sys_ni.c | 5 ++ 18 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/x86...

>>That boot_params.hdr.code32_start field is probably either invalid (bad reloc or something else causing the bootloader to >>calculate the wrong address) or valid but the thing it thinks it is pointing to wasn't loaded (missing PT_LOAD etc.). >boot_params.hdr.code32_start field is valid :) It is 0x100000, like expected > >Then I suspect that that segment isn't being

Hey folks, This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat, uh? This is the majority of the work. The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail miserably ;-) (and it was not yet

Hey folks, This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat, uh? This is the majority of the work. The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail miserably ;-) (and it was not yet

Hello, This series of patches integrates msr.h header. What it really does, is a series of steps to allow us to get rid of duplicate code between i386 and x86_64 versions With this done, achieving paravirt for x86_64 gets really easy, just a couple of extra code. The first patch was already sent a while ago, but was not yet pushed to any tree , to my knowledge. So it is sent again. Also,

Hello, This series of patches integrates msr.h header. What it really does, is a series of steps to allow us to get rid of duplicate code between i386 and x86_64 versions With this done, achieving paravirt for x86_64 gets really easy, just a couple of extra code. The first patch was already sent a while ago, but was not yet pushed to any tree , to my knowledge. So it is sent again. Also,