search for: procesess

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "procesess".

Did you mean: processes
2016 Jun 26
2
FLAC__SSE_OS change
...he last kernel. How many CPU cores to you have? Have you tried running more processes than you have cores at the same time? Say you have 4 cores, start up 8 terminals, each with their own clone of the FLAC sources and run 'make check' in all. If the OS is not save all SSE registers, these procesess will trample over each other's state and the FLAC tests should fail in non-reproducable ways. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/
2004 Nov 29
1
Re: TAR 4182518.999: OCFS problems encoutered during support Intel project
Hi Dean, Thanks for your kind help. Since I couldn't use vpn in Intel and be a little late after I arrived home, I didn't get chance to modify the TAR on metalink. Tomorrow, I will go CDC and update it accordingly. We think all the problems should be caused by OCFS itself. There are two outstanding problem for now. First, we will get below error message when we issue "srvconfig
2016 Jun 26
5
FLAC__SSE_OS change
First off, this code is horrible to read and work on. The recent commits are the first of what I hope is a massive clean up of this code. lvqcl wrote: > So if I understand things correctly, the current meaning of --(en|dis)able-sse is: > > on Linux: > --enable-sse: > add -msse2 to the compiler switches > do not test SSE OS support (assume that SSE is
2014 Mar 05
2
TV-Out on a GeForce 2MX supported?
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 12:46:04PM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > I actually checked this out last night, grabbed the BT869 datasheet. > Basically you'd have to implement something similar to the ch7006 > driver (see drivers/gpu/drm/i2c), which provides an API for setting > modes (the BT869 appears to have 8 of them, of which I'm guessing only > 4 are actually usable, probably
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC/PATCH LGUEST X86_64 03/13] lguest64 core
...read_u64(vcpu, base + idx * sizeof(u64)); + pudir = find_pud(linfo, gpud & PTE_MASK); + if (pudir) + __release_pud_hash(vcpu, pudir); + save = release_pgd(pgdir->pgdir, idx); + + if (!save && idx >= guest_host_idx(linfo->page_offset >> (PGDIR_SHIFT-3))) { + /* All guest procesess share the same kernel PML4Es */ + /* + * So we only free the tree once, but then reset + * all the others. + */ + list_for_each_entry(pgdir, &linfo->pgd_list, list) { + pgd = pgdir->pgdir[idx]; + if (!(pgd & _PAGE_PRESENT)) + continue; + BUG_ON((pgd & PTE_MASK) !=...
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC/PATCH LGUEST X86_64 03/13] lguest64 core
...read_u64(vcpu, base + idx * sizeof(u64)); + pudir = find_pud(linfo, gpud & PTE_MASK); + if (pudir) + __release_pud_hash(vcpu, pudir); + save = release_pgd(pgdir->pgdir, idx); + + if (!save && idx >= guest_host_idx(linfo->page_offset >> (PGDIR_SHIFT-3))) { + /* All guest procesess share the same kernel PML4Es */ + /* + * So we only free the tree once, but then reset + * all the others. + */ + list_for_each_entry(pgdir, &linfo->pgd_list, list) { + pgd = pgdir->pgdir[idx]; + if (!(pgd & _PAGE_PRESENT)) + continue; + BUG_ON((pgd & PTE_MASK) !=...