search for: proceses

I just moved my mail setup from one machine to a new one. After doing so, I've encountered a problem where imap processes will start accumulating, stuck in a loop eating loads of IO. Below is a trace

Hi Guys, I may have missed something in the conf file but while using a standard mysql auth method I'm finding many dovecot-auth processing sitting doing nothing. They grow to the extent that mysql runs out of connections after a week. Any ideas? Regards Andrew -- Andrew Hutchings (A-Wing) Linux Guru - Netserve Consultants Ltd. - www.domaincity.co.uk Admin - North Wales Linux User Group -

What about this: 1*1 = 1 One stream, the actual specification. 2*2 = 4 Four streams, unconected, unrelated, each representing ?????????????? one cuarter of the screen, each procesed in a diferent thread, ?????????????? each thread procesed in a diferent CPU. 4*4 = 16 Sixteen? streams, unconected, unrelated, each representing ?????????????? 1/16 of the screen, each procesed in a diferent thread,

Hi! I am still trying to clean the voice after procesing it with speex echo cancellation filter. I get some artifacts, the echo is removed, but you can here some metallic voices in background. Jean, in your test client you are using UDP connection and SpeexJitter to make sure UDP packets are in order. What if I use TCP/IP, do I still have to use SpeexJitter when using speex_echo_cancel ?

Estimados Les consulto por lo siguiente, en R y ubuntu, ambos en actualizados, tengo el siguiente mensaje (utilizando rstudio), no hay problemas porque realizando click se soluciona, pero antes no me hacía esa pregunta. ¿Es posible saltar esa pantalla? En la linea 13 de R no hay nada, ese fragmento de código es: # generate the tex files, one for each hospital in df library(knitr)

I am sorry if you receive it twice. since the mail-list said that i can't send mail to it unless i become one its member. hi, My system will crash when the disk(ext3) is full while i continue to launch 50 proceses to operate files(such as create, rm, mv, ...). Does ext3 have such a capability to stop journaling the changes when it finds there is no space left? or which source file of ext3 do i need to check this function? My System info: Redhat 7.3 Linux Kernel: 2.4.18-17 / : ext3 1.6G /boot...

hi, My system will crash when the disk(ext3) is full while i continue to launch 50 proceses to operate files(such as create, rm, mv, ...). Does ext3 have such a capability to stop journaling the changes when it finds there is no space left? or which source file of ext3 do i need to check it? My System info: Redhat 7.3 Linux Kernel: 2.4.18-17 / : ext3 1.6G /boot : ext3 60M...

Hi Jeremy, > The kernel checks the token attached to the process > at the time the process accesses the filesystem/resource. > > This is how OS'es work. It's how they *all* work. > > What you're complaining about is that changes to > the database that is used to create the process > token doesn't dynamically update running process > tokens. > >

....c:tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal(82) tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal: alarm (10) timed out for key replay cache mutex in tdb /usr/local/samba/private/secrets.tdb We believe we did find it, but only by sending a SIGTERM to all 'smbd' processes and being left with 'smbd' proceses that didn't die. (SIGKILL did remove them). Mac Assistant Systems Administrator @nibsc.ac.uk mac@nibsc.ac.uk Work: +44 1707 641565 Everything else: +44 7956 237670 (anytime)

...resulted in an rpm file. and then i used rpm -iv jre-1_5_0_01-linux-i586-rpm Everything went fine and I didn't get any error. But when I do java -version ......i don't get any output. I would like to know whether java is installed on my system or not. PS: I have carried out all the proceses as root. -- "No-one dies a virgin. Life screws everyone."

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Not sure what you are proposing is going to work, AD expects every user > to be a member of Domain Users, even though there is nothing in AD to > show membership. Ah. > Do you require this user to visible on all domain machines ? [...] > It might help if you could explain how you are going to use your new > user

...;, waiting an exceptionally long time after connecting before doing authentication. The users would report this as "Send/receive stuck on 64%" or something like that. During this time, I would note a number of <defunct> dovecot processes in ps. Increasing the number of idle login proceses in the pool to ridiculously high values (30) did not affect the symptom. Restarting dovecot would immediately resolve the issue. I believe this to be related somehow to dovecot's PAM interaction, because I was able to work around it by setting dovecot to talk directly to LDAP. Googling found...

...o te lo estás llevando a este nodo frontera que tiene que tener memoria > suficiente para poder leer el fichero que quieres. El que digas que tienes > 256Gb, entiendo que es repartidos en todo el clúster y no en ese nodo > frontera. > > La forma de trabajar no es esta. La idea es que proceses tus datos de > forma distribuida, desde el nodo frontera diriges/distribuyes el trabajo a > todos los nodos. Una forma que el propio Cloudera recomienda para este tipo > de procesamiento analítico es usar H2O. Con H2O al leer el fichero haces > una lectura distribuida, al igual que si r...

...ound calls as well. It has happened about 4 times since upgrading to Asterisk 1.0.8(we use to be on a CVS build from Feb). I've talked with Bellsouth and from their end everything is normal. They see the channel that the call is being sent to as being open. I have to kill -9 the asterisk proceses and restart it to get the pbx back up and fully operational. I have used ZapScan() and checked the audio on the channels that Asterisk still thinks are in use and there is nothing. I can't soft hangup the chanenls either. The commands "show queues" and "show agents" r...

Hi, I have been using Ferret on ruby-forum.com for a few days. While the searching works with reasonable performance, there are a lot of problems related to indexing. Sometimes the process hangs with 100% CPU usage, sometimes it leaves Lockfiles in the directory (causing other processes to fail while one ist still working), sometimes it even crashes with a segfault. I''m going to

I was just thinking how they could be easily supported. This would work, right? : imap stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap-login imaps stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap-login --ssl imap-login would try to connect to master process using some named socket. If it couldn't, it would create the master process itself. Master

Dear vegan team, Vegan development happens now completely in github. R-Forge repository is no more in sync with github. I tried to commit all github changes to R-Forge, but a week ago I got a conflict in file and I haven't had time to resolve that conflict. You can follow vegan development and vegan discussion also without signing to github. The system seems to be completely open and does not

Hi All, This is out of the topic question, but I''m hoping that you can help me. If for example I''m going to install a Fedora 4 64-bit with 8 to 12 Gig of physical memory, how much swap file of directory do I need to create? Thank you very much, Wennie

...group does not take effect > until a new process starts > BUT ADDING a user to the group takes effect immediately. > > Isn't this inconsistent with the "no dynamic updates to running processes" > idea? Adding a user to a group won't change the token on existing proceses. If a user attaches to Samba after that user is added to the group will create a new token attached to the new smbd process. It won't change any existing smbd process.

...ed early enough? Or maybe there is some performance problem of checking on each access (at least back when model developed). Or maybe the process model is more like gravity? That is how it is, but no-one knows why. ;) > Adding a user to a group won't change the token on existing > proceses. If a user attaches to Samba after that user is > added to the group will create a new token attached to > the new smbd process. It won't change any existing smbd > process. Ah! You're right. Somehow I didn't notice the PID changing. Thanks for your help! Chad.